Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Worse: UW o-line or 12s o-line?
Passion
Member Posts: 4,622
Both stink, but which truly makes you dry heave?
Comments
-
12s. They get paid REAL money to be that shitty.
-
Seahawks. Oh my fuck
-
Hawks are utter dreck
-
God just needs more time to get his guys in there.jecornel said:Hawks are utter dreck
-
Paging Owen13
-
Seattle did it to themselves with that trade.
-
Definitely the fucking Cable guys. On a related note, Tom Cable is so fucking overrated.
-
Some people in raider nation are still bitter about him getting fireddnc said:Definitely the fucking Cable guys. On a related note, Tom Cable is so fucking overrated.
-
Disagree. Unger couldn't stay healthy, trading him isn't the problem. Refusing to use high draft picks on the line and/or sign anyone worth a damn while trusting Cable can take a bunch of defensive lineman projects and teach them to play OL is the problem.section_332 said:Seattle did it to themselves with that trade.
-
I'm still LIPO with the Seahawks OL. The fact is, that is where Carrol and Schneider chose the OL as the place to not put money in. In the NFL, you have to make sacrifices. In college football, you can sign whoever you want so there really isn't an excuse.
I am puzzled by the love fest for Novak though. The OL played well with Lewis and Lempierre last year.
