Hugh's 1 gripe with the game.

CuntWaffle

"Keith was a little hesitant throwing over the middle"

Brought up John Ross's pass to the end zone. Of course if Jack would have thrown that ball it would have been because JR gave up on the play and didn't hustle.

CaptainPJ

Ray-siss

[Deleted User]

It's pathetic how Hugh will go out of his way to praise Locker but will try to minimize Price or Russell Wilson's performance.

This is the same guy who still isn't quite sold on Wilson yet will give Jake a passing grade after going 4-20 against Nebraska.

If you dare question Hugh's opinion you are met with "he's forgotten more about the game than you will ever know".

Yet Rick Neuheisel and any other coach without an agenda would take Price over Locker, would take Wilson over Flynn.

RavennaDawg

Once upon a time we actually had a team with a better defense and special teams than 1991.

And that team could not go undefeated because the offense was so mediocre. Great quarterbacking.

And T Pryor > M Flynn.

[Deleted User]

RavennaDawg said:

Once upon a time we actually had a team with a better defense and special teams than 1991.

And that team could not go undefeated because the offense was so mediocre. Great quarterbacking.

And T Pryor > M Flynn.

Yup. That year we won a game where we only had THREE first downs.

http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/hugh-millen-1.html

Millen had 11 career passing touchdowns to 23 interceptions and was benched during his senior year. He should seriously shut the fuck up.

RoadDawg55

I only know about the '84 team from reading about them. I never watched tapes of them like I did with the '91 team. Their defense must have been incredible to withstand such shitty QB play.

CuntWaffle

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RavennaDawg said:

Once upon a time we actually had a team with a better defense and special teams than 1991.

And that team could not go undefeated because the offense was so mediocre. Great quarterbacking.

And T Pryor > M Flynn.

Yup. That year we won a game where we only had THREE first downs.

http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/hugh-millen-1.html

Millen had 11 career passing touchdowns to 23 interceptions and was benched during his senior year. He should seriously shut the fuck up.

He always tries to save face by going "And I know that people will bring up that Keith was a better QB than me and I know and that's fine... but..."

[Deleted User]

CuntWaffle said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RavennaDawg said:

Once upon a time we actually had a team with a better defense and special teams than 1991.

And that team could not go undefeated because the offense was so mediocre. Great quarterbacking.

And T Pryor > M Flynn.

Yup. That year we won a game where we only had THREE first downs.

http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/hugh-millen-1.html

Millen had 11 career passing touchdowns to 23 interceptions and was benched during his senior year. He should seriously shut the fuck up.

He always tries to save face by going "And I know that people will bring up that Keith was a better QB than me and I know and that's fine... but..."

Price is our best QB since Tui although you'd never know it listening to KJR or reading Doogman.

Then again if you are listening to KJR or reading Doogman's opinions you should probably die in a fire by now.

RoadDawg55

CuntWaffle said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

RavennaDawg said:

Once upon a time we actually had a team with a better defense and special teams than 1991.

And that team could not go undefeated because the offense was so mediocre. Great quarterbacking.

And T Pryor > M Flynn.

Yup. That year we won a game where we only had THREE first downs.

http://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/hugh-millen-1.html

Millen had 11 career passing touchdowns to 23 interceptions and was benched during his senior year. He should seriously shut the fuck up.

He always tries to save face by going "And I know that people will bring up that Keith was a better QB than me and I know and that's fine... but..."

I never listen to the Honks anymore, but I am glad Hugh Millen admits that. Hugh being a shitty QB has nothing to do with my criticism of him. John Gruden and Mike Holmgren weren't great QB's, but they know what the fuck they are talking about when it comes to QB play. I hate it when doogs and others use the shitty QB stuff to disagree with Hugh's analysis. Hugh gets his analysis's wrong because he's a moron. Nothing more, nothing less. It has nothing to do with how good he was at QB.

I hate it when former players say somebody who hasn't played the game at a high level don't know what they are talking about. Look no further than Matt Millen. The guy was a good LB, but was the possibly the worst GM of all time. Look at Michael Jordan in basketball. He has no fucking clue on how to put together a good team. He can't get a draft pick right. Kwame Brown, Adam Morrison, etc. He has missed on basically every draft pick. There is a reason not very many great players have gone on to be great coaches and GM's.

Lots of professional teams are now using stats and analystics guys to operate front offices because lots of them know how to put together a good team verses a guy who ignores that stuff, but was a former star. Billy Beane doesn't even watch the A's games because he doesn't want to have biases when constructing a team. He doesn't want to play favorites and keep guys who hurt the team in every way, but are coach's favorites because they hustle out every ground ball. For every double play they hustle out to win a game, they lose 3 more by hitting .200.

HeretoBeatmyChest

We are going to rip Hugh big-time on the next podcast.

[Deleted User]

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

We are going to rip Hugh big-time on the next podcast.

Please don't forget the Army of Doogs those guys deserve their moment in the spotlight.

unfrozencaveman

Speaking of Army of Doogs, whatever happened to that chick they had bending over in the vids a couple years ago? She seemed a pretty solid fan

DerekJohnson

RoadDawg55 said:

I only know about the '84 team from reading about them. I never watched tapes of them like I did with the '91 team. Their defense must have been incredible to withstand such shitty QB play.

I was 13 that year and it was an incredible, incredible defense. Ronnie Holmes was the war daddy up front and was surrounded by some vicious, swarming, aggressive hitters. They forced something like 52 turnovers that year.

RavennaDawg

RoadDawg55 said:

I only know about the '84 team from reading about them. I never watched tapes of them like I did with the '91 team. Their defense must have been incredible to withstand such shitty QB play.

Empterman starts over Holmes.

Smith starts over Rodgers.

Fields (RIP) and Small (RIP) are a push.

That's about it.

Hall was a first rounder but both Pearson and Jackson were better, and had better pro careers.

RoadDawg55

RavennaDawg said:

RoadDawg55 said:

I only know about the '84 team from reading about them. I never watched tapes of them like I did with the '91 team. Their defense must have been incredible to withstand such shitty QB play.

Empterman starts over Holmes.

Smith starts over Rodgers.

Fields (RIP) and Small (RIP) are a push.

That's about it.

Hall was a first rounder but both Pearson and Jackson were better, and had better pro careers.

Good info. What about Meamber vs. Hoffman, Fraley, and Clifford? Peoples vs. Pahuka and Smith?

[Deleted User]

That 1984 team had two future top 10 picks on their roster in Ron Holmes and Reggie Rogers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Washington_Huskies_in_the_NFL_Draft

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

We are going to rip Hugh big-time on the next podcast.

Have you put your podcasts on iTunes yet?

MikeDamone

HeretoBeatmyChest

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

We are going to rip Hugh big-time on the next podcast.

Have you put your podcasts on iTunes yet?

Will try to do that today.

Swaye

Hugh is a douchebag. That pretty much sums it up.

greenblood

He_Needs_More_Time said:

It's pathetic how Hugh will go out of his way to praise Locker but will try to minimize Price or Russell Wilson's performance.

This is the same guy who still isn't quite sold on Wilson yet will give Jake a passing grade after going 4-20 against Nebraska.

If you dare question Hugh's opinion you are met with "he's forgotten more about the game than you will ever know".

Yet Rick Neuheisel and any other coach without an agenda would take Price over Locker, would take Wilson over Flynn.

Has Hugh ever the answered the question: Would you rather have Locker or Wilson quarterbacking the Seahawks?