If I like to Utah to upset ...

pawz

I also like them to cover 10.5, moneyline at +342 and the under at 63.5

That is all.

BallSacked

Doog abundance bet.

I like it.

TierbsHsotBoobs

pawz said:

I also like them to cover 10.5, moneyline at +342 and the under at 63.5

That is all.

Betting the under on an Oregon game in the Pac-12 is living dangerously.

doogsinparadise

Insanely low under, 78 total points scored last year in SLC.

WilburHooksHands

R

pawz said:

I also like them to cover 10.5, moneyline at +342 and the under at 63.5

That is all.

Outright is doogin pretty god damn hard. I can't really cast the first stone here though.

pawz

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

pawz said:

I also like them to cover 10.5, moneyline at +342 and the under at 63.5

That is all.

Betting the under on an Oregon game in the Pac-12 is living dangerously.

It is dangerous, but if Utah is going to win, they will have to keep the Zeros off the board as much as possible - thus the under.

pawz

WilburHooksHands said:

R

pawz said:

I also like them to cover 10.5, moneyline at +342 and the under at 63.5

That is all.

Outright is doogin pretty god damn hard. I can't really cast the first stone here though.

I've considered 12 steps..

IPukeOregonGrellow

Don't forget to bet the 401k.

pawz

IPukeOregonGrellow said:

Don't forget to bet the 401k.

That would not fall under the guise of proper bankroll management.

pawz

Hi there. I'm in trouble on the under. That is all.

TierbsHsotBoobs

pawz said:

Hi there. I'm in trouble on the under. That is all.

Small price to pay for this awesome plungering.

Southerndawg

They're stacking plungers, the first handle is exiting the duck's bill.

RaceBannon

Utah nearly gets the over by themselves

TierbsHsotBoobs

pawz said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

pawz said:

I also like them to cover 10.5, moneyline at +342 and the under at 63.5

That is all.

Betting the under on an Oregon game in the Pac-12 is living dangerously.

It is dangerous, but if Utah is going to win, they will have to keep the Zeros off the board as much as possible - thus the under.

Huh?

Tequilla

You clearly underestimated the Quook defense

Kaepsknee

Tequilla said:

You clearly underestimated the Quook defense

Can we get an updated Article on Gary pattersons auce D?

pawz

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

pawz said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

pawz said:

I also like them to cover 10.5, moneyline at +342 and the under at 63.5

That is all.

Betting the under on an Oregon game in the Pac-12 is living dangerously.

It is dangerous, but if Utah is going to win, they will have to keep the Zeros off the board as much as possible - thus the under.

Huh?

You didn't think #myUtes would score 40 either - let alone 60. So fuck off.

TierbsHsotBoobs

pawz said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

pawz said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

pawz said:

I also like them to cover 10.5, moneyline at +342 and the under at 63.5

That is all.

Betting the under on an Oregon game in the Pac-12 is living dangerously.

It is dangerous, but if Utah is going to win, they will have to keep the Zeros off the board as much as possible - thus the under.

Huh?

You didn't think #myUtes would score 40 either - let alone 60. So fuck off.

Where did I say that?

pawz

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

pawz said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

pawz said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

pawz said:

I also like them to cover 10.5, moneyline at +342 and the under at 63.5

That is all.

Betting the under on an Oregon game in the Pac-12 is living dangerously.

It is dangerous, but if Utah is going to win, they will have to keep the Zeros off the board as much as possible - thus the under.

Huh?

You didn't think #myUtes would score 40 either - let alone 60. So fuck off.

Where did I say that?

Huh?