So. Half-time. Who makes better adjustments? What advice should we document for Sark to incorporate into his game plan? I trust Wilcox so far so if we just focus on the offense I would say RUN THE DAMN BALL. 55-60% runs isn't too hard. Mind you doing that in the first half pays off more than in the second half but still...
Peterson still hasn't pulled out the gadget, I'm still worried
Truest doog statement so far. 10 points isn't indicative to how well the offense has played. Poor clock management and losing track of downs cost you guys at least 6 points so far. This is the best I have seen the UW offense against a quality opponent in the Sark era.
So. Half-time. Who makes better adjustments? What advice should we document for Sark to incorporate into his game plan? I trust Wilcox so far so if we just focus on the offense I would say RUN THE DAMN BALL. 55-60% runs isn't too hard. Mind you doing that in the first half pays off more than in the second half but still...
Peterson still hasn't pulled out the gadget, I'm still worried
Truest doog statement so far. 10 points isn't indicative to how well the offense has played. Poor clock management and losing track of downs cost you guys at least 6 points so far. This is the best I have seen the UW offense against a quality opponent in the Sark era.
This is a true statement and we only have 10 points. Says a lot about Sark. I actually like the play calling(minus the red zone), like the tempo yet UW only has 10 points despite moving the ball with ease on their defense.
So. Half-time. Who makes better adjustments? What advice should we document for Sark to incorporate into his game plan? I trust Wilcox so far so if we just focus on the offense I would say RUN THE DAMN BALL. 55-60% runs isn't too hard. Mind you doing that in the first half pays off more than in the second half but still...
Peterson still hasn't pulled out the gadget, I'm still worried
Comments
Let's see how the halftime adjustments play out.
I took Nevada. Nevada is too good to take a game one blow out.