What I'm Hearing on Eason...
Comments
-
In that scenario, UGA could also suck ass this year and Richt could be shitcannedBallSacked said:FWIW UGA is going to start Grayson Lambert at QB this year - he was absolute trash at UVA last year. He got benched after two pick6s in game 1. (But how are SEC QBs terrible?)...so if the other Georgia QBs on the roster can't beat that sack of crap out, Eason has a chance to start next year at UGA. JMO, DT.
-
Disagree.AtomicDawg said:
You are assuming he Transfers and is not doing it because he sucks. Most of the time when a qb transfers it is because others on the roster are better. If we are that desperate for a qb by the time this hypothetical transfer would happen that we are excited about a uga reject they tried to hand the starting job and he sucked well, just burn it down. Burn the whole thing down.Tequilla said:Some of you fuckers really need to take a walk for perspective ...
You say that we need a great QB each year and have bashed Peterman for not doing so ... yet when faced with a transfer scenario for Eason you bash that as saying then Browning must not be who we think he is. Fuck.
Let's take the gloves off and get serious for a second ...
Browning starts this year as true frosh with Eason in HS ...
Browning starts next year as a true soph while Eason either starts or not as a Frosh ...
Browning starts as a true junior and then may or may not leave the program ... Eason loses the starting job and either transfers out as a true soph or as a RS Frosh ...
Continue the extrapolation and Eason is either in position to start as a RS Soph (if Browning leaves after his Junior year) or as a RS Junior if Browning stays all 4 years.
Want to know the real reason Eason's camp is changing their tune now and why Petersen is upping his recruitment? It's because Browning is starting as a true frosh.
Eason is going to play before he is ready to. The leash with him is going to be short compared to a local golden boy. As soon as Eason gets benched for this other kid, he's going to realize that he was played a bit and look to go somewhere where he will have a shot at playing time. Heading home is a legit option given that he will almost certainly transfer to somewhere in the PAC.
Not every QB that transfers sucks. Moreover, if he eventually transfers back into the program that covers us not recruiting a QB this year. -
He'd most likely transfer to USC though. I read somewhere that he loves Sark, and loves Tui even more. Was in the bag when Sark coached at UW. I read that somewhereTequilla said:
Disagree.AtomicDawg said:
You are assuming he Transfers and is not doing it because he sucks. Most of the time when a qb transfers it is because others on the roster are better. If we are that desperate for a qb by the time this hypothetical transfer would happen that we are excited about a uga reject they tried to hand the starting job and he sucked well, just burn it down. Burn the whole thing down.Tequilla said:Some of you fuckers really need to take a walk for perspective ...
You say that we need a great QB each year and have bashed Peterman for not doing so ... yet when faced with a transfer scenario for Eason you bash that as saying then Browning must not be who we think he is. Fuck.
Let's take the gloves off and get serious for a second ...
Browning starts this year as true frosh with Eason in HS ...
Browning starts next year as a true soph while Eason either starts or not as a Frosh ...
Browning starts as a true junior and then may or may not leave the program ... Eason loses the starting job and either transfers out as a true soph or as a RS Frosh ...
Continue the extrapolation and Eason is either in position to start as a RS Soph (if Browning leaves after his Junior year) or as a RS Junior if Browning stays all 4 years.
Want to know the real reason Eason's camp is changing their tune now and why Petersen is upping his recruitment? It's because Browning is starting as a true frosh.
Eason is going to play before he is ready to. The leash with him is going to be short compared to a local golden boy. As soon as Eason gets benched for this other kid, he's going to realize that he was played a bit and look to go somewhere where he will have a shot at playing time. Heading home is a legit option given that he will almost certainly transfer to somewhere in the PAC.
Not every QB that transfers sucks. Moreover, if he eventually transfers back into the program that covers us not recruiting a QB this year. -
If we just hired Nuss we wouldn't be in this situation. Eason loved Nuss.
-
Sounds to me like the Eason family burned a lot of bridges with Sark and are acting like idiots.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Pete is putting on full court press for Eason. Family likes Pete but admits coaching transition hurt UW's chances. But isn't wavering on his commitment to Georgia. Also Eason family does not like Sark. Source specifically told me Kim was full of shit on that.
-
Fucking this.HuskyJW said:WTF...that makes no sense.
If they didn't like Sark than the coaching change (from 18 months ago...will be 30 months when he actually enrolls) should have helped.
They cite bad timing, whatever the fuck that means. Kid was only 3 and a half months into his sophomore year of high school. On signing day, Pete will have been the coach for 26 fucking months and by the time kid suits up for his first game, the coach for 33 months.
It's obvious the kid has talent and you take the kid no matter what but sounds to me like this is Heaps 2.0, as far as parents living vicariously through their son and wanting their egos massaged. The dad might even move to Athens with him. I'm sure none are as bad as Mrs. Heaps, but whoever used the term fluffer for only 2 years is spot on. -
Attacks like this from anonymous internet poasters will be deleted. Always have, always will. If you want to make wild accusations like this, you need to put your name on it.BabsGilbyTawdTy said:
This would make for a great thread at Dawgman.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Also Eason family does not like Sark. Source specifically told me Kim was full of shit on that.
Edit: Until Ken deleted it. -
Flagged for thinking Sark will still be at USC in 2 years.bananasnblondes said:
He'd most likely transfer to USC though. I read somewhere that he loves Sark, and loves Tui even more. Was in the bag when Sark coached at UW. I read that somewhereTequilla said:
Disagree.AtomicDawg said:
You are assuming he Transfers and is not doing it because he sucks. Most of the time when a qb transfers it is because others on the roster are better. If we are that desperate for a qb by the time this hypothetical transfer would happen that we are excited about a uga reject they tried to hand the starting job and he sucked well, just burn it down. Burn the whole thing down.Tequilla said:Some of you fuckers really need to take a walk for perspective ...
You say that we need a great QB each year and have bashed Peterman for not doing so ... yet when faced with a transfer scenario for Eason you bash that as saying then Browning must not be who we think he is. Fuck.
Let's take the gloves off and get serious for a second ...
Browning starts this year as true frosh with Eason in HS ...
Browning starts next year as a true soph while Eason either starts or not as a Frosh ...
Browning starts as a true junior and then may or may not leave the program ... Eason loses the starting job and either transfers out as a true soph or as a RS Frosh ...
Continue the extrapolation and Eason is either in position to start as a RS Soph (if Browning leaves after his Junior year) or as a RS Junior if Browning stays all 4 years.
Want to know the real reason Eason's camp is changing their tune now and why Petersen is upping his recruitment? It's because Browning is starting as a true frosh.
Eason is going to play before he is ready to. The leash with him is going to be short compared to a local golden boy. As soon as Eason gets benched for this other kid, he's going to realize that he was played a bit and look to go somewhere where he will have a shot at playing time. Heading home is a legit option given that he will almost certainly transfer to somewhere in the PAC.
Not every QB that transfers sucks. Moreover, if he eventually transfers back into the program that covers us not recruiting a QB this year. -
Make sure you post your contact informationH_D said:
Attacks like this from anonymous internet poasters will be deleted. Always have, always will. If you want to make wild accusations like this, you need to put your name on it.BabsGilbyTawdTy said:
This would make for a great thread at Dawgman.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Also Eason family does not like Sark. Source specifically told me Kim was full of shit on that.
Edit: Until Ken deleted it. -
I heard the issue was Pete wasnt the first to offer.
Also, Eason's camp is convinced he will start from day 1 next season. -
So the problem is actually Browning then
-
-
Lots of interesting Hot Takes in this thread. As always, what you post can, and will, be used against you, years later.
-
Teq dialed inTequilla said:Eason will go to Georgia ...
He will get passed along the way at Georgia by some local kid ... that will spurn a transfer.
Pete's recruitment right now is as much about getting Eason today as it is 2-3 years from now when he transfers. -
Some good information from chest and amazingly flamboyant Teq posts in the thread. But of course all the upvotes and chincredibles were given to uninformed posts and pointless jokes, LOL.
-
How far teq has fallen...Neighbor2972 said:
Teq dialed inTequilla said:Eason will go to Georgia ...
He will get passed along the way at Georgia by some local kid ... that will spurn a transfer.
Pete's recruitment right now is as much about getting Eason today as it is 2-3 years from now when he transfers. -
Teq cleaning up this thread.
-
Teq...first, right, brief.Tequilla said:Eason will go to Georgia ...
He will get passed along the way at Georgia by some local kid ... that will spurn a transfer.
Pete's recruitment right now is as much about getting Eason today as it is 2-3 years from now when he transfers. -
@Tequilla any stock advice?
-
Good lord @Tequilla pass the burning bush
-
