Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What I'm Hearing on Eason...

2

Comments

  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Coaching transition hurts UWs chances because they hated Sark?

    K.
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    .

    Eason will graduate early and play his 4th year at Oregon

    So will Max Browne.
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    HuskyJW said:

    WTF...that makes no sense.

    If they didn't like Sark than the coaching change (from 18 months ago...will be 30 months when he actually enrolls) should have helped.

    Maybe they wanted a coach to fluff their kid for 4 years instead of 2.
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    Eason did sign his financial aid agreement with Georgia BUT that just means Georgia is committed to him. Eason plans to graduate in December.

    Win with the All-Whites in Boise and Peterman is right back in the running.
  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,747 Swaye's Wigwam
    Someone should 5 reasons why UW is getting Eason.

    And someone should 5 reasons again when Oregon play Georgia State ala last year.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    The only reason I think we have a 5% chance at Eason is because when Eason signed his Financial Aid papers, UGA did not publicize it. If they had publicized it and he ended up not going to UGA they would be in trouble with NCAA.

    So somewhere in the back of their heads at Georgia they are concerned about his commitment.

    Still not gonna happen though.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,882
    Some of you fuckers really need to take a walk for perspective ...

    You say that we need a great QB each year and have bashed Peterman for not doing so ... yet when faced with a transfer scenario for Eason you bash that as saying then Browning must not be who we think he is. Fuck.

    Let's take the gloves off and get serious for a second ...

    Browning starts this year as true frosh with Eason in HS ...

    Browning starts next year as a true soph while Eason either starts or not as a Frosh ...

    Browning starts as a true junior and then may or may not leave the program ... Eason loses the starting job and either transfers out as a true soph or as a RS Frosh ...

    Continue the extrapolation and Eason is either in position to start as a RS Soph (if Browning leaves after his Junior year) or as a RS Junior if Browning stays all 4 years.

    Want to know the real reason Eason's camp is changing their tune now and why Petersen is upping his recruitment? It's because Browning is starting as a true frosh.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,282 Founders Club
    "Hey Eason, we think you will do a much better job holding Browning's clipbored than KJCS or Lindy. Come on over!!!!!1"
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,092 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2015
    Tequilla said:

    Some of you fuckers really need to take a walk for perspective ...

    You say that we need a great QB each year and have bashed Peterman for not doing so ... yet when faced with a transfer scenario for Eason you bash that as saying then Browning must not be who we think he is. Fuck.

    Let's take the gloves off and get serious for a second ...

    Browning starts this year as true frosh with Eason in HS ...

    Browning starts next year as a true soph while Eason either starts or not as a Frosh ...

    Browning starts as a true junior and then may or may not leave the program ... Eason loses the starting job and either transfers out as a true soph or as a RS Frosh ...

    Continue the extrapolation and Eason is either in position to start as a RS Soph (if Browning leaves after his Junior year) or as a RS Junior if Browning stays all 4 years.

    Want to know the real reason Eason's camp is changing their tune now and why Petersen is upping his recruitment? It's because Browning is starting as a true frosh.

    You are assuming he Transfers and is not doing it because he sucks. Most of the time when a qb transfers it is because others on the roster are better. If we are that desperate for a qb by the time this hypothetical transfer would happen that we are excited about a uga reject they tried to hand the starting job and he sucked well, just burn it down. Burn the whole thing down.
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,280

    FWIW UGA is going to start Grayson Lambert at QB this year - he was absolute trash at UVA last year. He got benched after two pick6s in game 1. (But how are SEC QBs terrible?)...so if the other Georgia QBs on the roster can't beat that sack of crap out, Eason has a chance to start next year at UGA. JMO, DT.

    In that scenario, UGA could also suck ass this year and Richt could be shitcanned
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,882

    Tequilla said:

    Some of you fuckers really need to take a walk for perspective ...

    You say that we need a great QB each year and have bashed Peterman for not doing so ... yet when faced with a transfer scenario for Eason you bash that as saying then Browning must not be who we think he is. Fuck.

    Let's take the gloves off and get serious for a second ...

    Browning starts this year as true frosh with Eason in HS ...

    Browning starts next year as a true soph while Eason either starts or not as a Frosh ...

    Browning starts as a true junior and then may or may not leave the program ... Eason loses the starting job and either transfers out as a true soph or as a RS Frosh ...

    Continue the extrapolation and Eason is either in position to start as a RS Soph (if Browning leaves after his Junior year) or as a RS Junior if Browning stays all 4 years.

    Want to know the real reason Eason's camp is changing their tune now and why Petersen is upping his recruitment? It's because Browning is starting as a true frosh.

    You are assuming he Transfers and is not doing it because he sucks. Most of the time when a qb transfers it is because others on the roster are better. If we are that desperate for a qb by the time this hypothetical transfer would happen that we are excited about a uga reject they tried to hand the starting job and he sucked well, just burn it down. Burn the whole thing down.
    Disagree.

    Eason is going to play before he is ready to. The leash with him is going to be short compared to a local golden boy. As soon as Eason gets benched for this other kid, he's going to realize that he was played a bit and look to go somewhere where he will have a shot at playing time. Heading home is a legit option given that he will almost certainly transfer to somewhere in the PAC.

    Not every QB that transfers sucks. Moreover, if he eventually transfers back into the program that covers us not recruiting a QB this year.
  • pat_hmpat_hm Member Posts: 941
    If we just hired Nuss we wouldn't be in this situation. Eason loved Nuss.
  • DugtheDoogDugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180
    HuskyJW said:

    WTF...that makes no sense.

    If they didn't like Sark than the coaching change (from 18 months ago...will be 30 months when he actually enrolls) should have helped.

    Fucking this.

    They cite bad timing, whatever the fuck that means. Kid was only 3 and a half months into his sophomore year of high school. On signing day, Pete will have been the coach for 26 fucking months and by the time kid suits up for his first game, the coach for 33 months.

    It's obvious the kid has talent and you take the kid no matter what but sounds to me like this is Heaps 2.0, as far as parents living vicariously through their son and wanting their egos massaged. The dad might even move to Athens with him. I'm sure none are as bad as Mrs. Heaps, but whoever used the term fluffer for only 2 years is spot on.
  • H_DH_D Member Posts: 6,098

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    Some of you fuckers really need to take a walk for perspective ...

    You say that we need a great QB each year and have bashed Peterman for not doing so ... yet when faced with a transfer scenario for Eason you bash that as saying then Browning must not be who we think he is. Fuck.

    Let's take the gloves off and get serious for a second ...

    Browning starts this year as true frosh with Eason in HS ...

    Browning starts next year as a true soph while Eason either starts or not as a Frosh ...

    Browning starts as a true junior and then may or may not leave the program ... Eason loses the starting job and either transfers out as a true soph or as a RS Frosh ...

    Continue the extrapolation and Eason is either in position to start as a RS Soph (if Browning leaves after his Junior year) or as a RS Junior if Browning stays all 4 years.

    Want to know the real reason Eason's camp is changing their tune now and why Petersen is upping his recruitment? It's because Browning is starting as a true frosh.

    You are assuming he Transfers and is not doing it because he sucks. Most of the time when a qb transfers it is because others on the roster are better. If we are that desperate for a qb by the time this hypothetical transfer would happen that we are excited about a uga reject they tried to hand the starting job and he sucked well, just burn it down. Burn the whole thing down.
    Disagree.

    Eason is going to play before he is ready to. The leash with him is going to be short compared to a local golden boy. As soon as Eason gets benched for this other kid, he's going to realize that he was played a bit and look to go somewhere where he will have a shot at playing time. Heading home is a legit option given that he will almost certainly transfer to somewhere in the PAC.

    Not every QB that transfers sucks. Moreover, if he eventually transfers back into the program that covers us not recruiting a QB this year.
    He'd most likely transfer to USC though. I read somewhere that he loves Sark, and loves Tui even more. Was in the bag when Sark coached at UW. I read that somewhere
    Flagged for thinking Sark will still be at USC in 2 years.
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,280
    H_D said:

    Also Eason family does not like Sark. Source specifically told me Kim was full of shit on that.

    This would make for a great thread at Dawgman.

    Edit: Until Ken deleted it.
    Attacks like this from anonymous internet poasters will be deleted. Always have, always will. If you want to make wild accusations like this, you need to put your name on it.
    Make sure you post your contact information
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    I heard the issue was Pete wasnt the first to offer.

    Also, Eason's camp is convinced he will start from day 1 next season.
Sign In or Register to comment.