Unemployment-discuss
Comments
-
To hear the pebble bounce around?2001400ex said:
Just shake my head.HoustonHusky said:Here is the entire discussion HondoFS that points out how big of a moron you are. Not sure why you want to rehash it...but then again, I never did understand stupid.
hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/18299/hellava-oconomy-we-got-going-on-here/p3
-
Then post a link and document the change.pawz said:
I seem to remember the methodology changing as recently as the October before Obama's re-election.2001400ex said:
Same methodology as when Reagan was president.PurpleThrobber said:
You mean all the people who quit trying to find work and are no longer counted? So there's that.2001400ex said:
Don't forget labor participation rates while you gurgle on Reagan's ballzak.PurpleThrobber said:Reagan's employed were making middle class living wage incomes.
Obama's employed are slightly above the poverty line.
Except @HoustonHusky thinks the formula changed drastically, when really it didn't. There's been minor changes, but nothing that significantly impacts the number.
-
And that has what to do with you being a liar?pawz said:
I seem to remember the methodology changing as recently as the October before Obama's re-election.2001400ex said:
Same methodology as when Reagan was president.PurpleThrobber said:
You mean all the people who quit trying to find work and are no longer counted? So there's that.2001400ex said:
Don't forget labor participation rates while you gurgle on Reagan's ballzak.PurpleThrobber said:Reagan's employed were making middle class living wage incomes.
Obama's employed are slightly above the poverty line.
Except @HoustonHusky thinks the formula changed drastically, when really it didn't. There's been minor changes, but nothing that significantly impacts the number. -
Median household income in constant 2012 dollars is higher now than it was in the 80's (though it has decreased since the recession).PurpleThrobber said:Reagan's employed were making middle class living wage incomes.
Obama's employed are slightly above the poverty line.
-
I'm sure inflation has no part in this equation.UWhuskytskeet said:
Median household income in constant 2012 dollars is higher now than it was in the 80's (though it has decreased since the recession).PurpleThrobber said:Reagan's employed were making middle class living wage incomes.
Obama's employed are slightly above the poverty line. -
I'm guessing you weren't an econ major.CuntWaffle said:
I'm sure inflation has no part in this equation.UWhuskytskeet said:
Median household income in constant 2012 dollars is higher now than it was in the 80's (though it has decreased since the recession).PurpleThrobber said:Reagan's employed were making middle class living wage incomes.
Obama's employed are slightly above the poverty line. -
CHRIST.CuntWaffle said:
I'm sure inflation has no part in this equation.UWhuskytskeet said:
Median household income in constant 2012 dollars is higher now than it was in the 80's (though it has decreased since the recession).PurpleThrobber said:Reagan's employed were making middle class living wage incomes.
Obama's employed are slightly above the poverty line.
Not your best effort on that one. -
constant 2012 dollarsCuntWaffle said:
I'm sure inflation has no part in this equation.UWhuskytskeet said:
Median household income in constant 2012 dollars is higher now than it was in the 80's (though it has decreased since the recession).PurpleThrobber said:Reagan's employed were making middle class living wage incomes.
Obama's employed are slightly above the poverty line.
No. It. Doesn't. -
That's some spectacular Cuog mathUWhuskytskeet said:
Median household income in constant 2012 dollars is higher now than it was in the 80's (though it has decreased since the recession).PurpleThrobber said:Reagan's employed were making middle class living wage incomes.
Obama's employed are slightly above the poverty line.
To find the Median, place the numbers you are given in value order and find the middle number.
Example: find the Median of {13, 23, 11, 16, 15, 10, 26}.
Put them in order: {10, 11, 13, 15, 16, 23, 26}
The middle number is 15, so the median is 15.
Let's keep it simple to show what a deceptive pile of shit you are spewing forth:
1980 median: 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
2012 median 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
-
Jesus Christ, is everyone here fucking retarded?PurpleThrobber said:
That's some spectacular Cuog mathUWhuskytskeet said:
Median household income in constant 2012 dollars is higher now than it was in the 80's (though it has decreased since the recession).PurpleThrobber said:Reagan's employed were making middle class living wage incomes.
Obama's employed are slightly above the poverty line.
To find the Median, place the numbers you are given in value order and find the middle number.
Example: find the Median of {13, 23, 11, 16, 15, 10, 26}.
Put them in order: {10, 11, 13, 15, 16, 23, 26}
The middle number is 15, so the median is 15.
Let's keep it simple to show what a deceptive pile of shit you are spewing forth:
1980 median: 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
2012 median 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1,15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
