Hey guess what
Comments
-
what would be the point?2001400ex said:
Then enlighten me as to "the truth".sarktastic said:
No.2001400ex said:
Yes, isn't that the goal of the insurance exchanges?sarktastic said:
Why not try competition, instead?2001400ex said:
To answer your question, going to single payer would be better for the common man. And Obama/Democrats made it more difficult.pawz said:
Slowly now....2001400ex said:
My head hurts after reading that. You truly are just fucking stupid.pawz said:
Please to be explaining why this is a good thing.2001400ex said:
The fact you can't see how obamacare just added 30 million people to private insurance companies and made it harder to go single payer tells us all we need to know about your education level.pawz said:
The fact that you can't see how obamacare is the first step down that slippery slope tells us all we need to know about your level of education.2001400ex said:
Talk to me when Obama single handedly turns America into a communism.CuntWaffle said:But I've been told socialism is fair and works?
Hondo? True?
I'm very clear on my education level.
That being said, a dude who gives up his million dollar a year compensation has to change his lifestyle. Shocking.
Education level indeed.
You might not actually be a shill for the left. You're a shill for the health insurance lobby. Obamacare is your pet issue.
Makes more sense now. LEAVE!!
Why is it good for the common man to make a single payer system more difficult to attain?
Or you could tell the truth and admit your position is indefensible - except by someone with an ulterior, fiscal motive.
Since I'm (allegedly) so fucking stupid, explain it like you would to a 3 year old.
That clear enough? Or do I need to define single payer and explain what obamacare does?
Not at all, in fact.
It IS one of the talking points in the propaganda effort to obscure the truth. Thanks for playing. -
Lol typical. Can't ever explain an actual point.sarktastic said:
what would be the point?2001400ex said:
Then enlighten me as to "the truth".sarktastic said:
No.2001400ex said:
Yes, isn't that the goal of the insurance exchanges?sarktastic said:
Why not try competition, instead?2001400ex said:
To answer your question, going to single payer would be better for the common man. And Obama/Democrats made it more difficult.pawz said:
Slowly now....2001400ex said:
My head hurts after reading that. You truly are just fucking stupid.pawz said:
Please to be explaining why this is a good thing.2001400ex said:
The fact you can't see how obamacare just added 30 million people to private insurance companies and made it harder to go single payer tells us all we need to know about your education level.pawz said:
The fact that you can't see how obamacare is the first step down that slippery slope tells us all we need to know about your level of education.2001400ex said:
Talk to me when Obama single handedly turns America into a communism.CuntWaffle said:But I've been told socialism is fair and works?
Hondo? True?
I'm very clear on my education level.
That being said, a dude who gives up his million dollar a year compensation has to change his lifestyle. Shocking.
Education level indeed.
You might not actually be a shill for the left. You're a shill for the health insurance lobby. Obamacare is your pet issue.
Makes more sense now. LEAVE!!
Why is it good for the common man to make a single payer system more difficult to attain?
Or you could tell the truth and admit your position is indefensible - except by someone with an ulterior, fiscal motive.
Since I'm (allegedly) so fucking stupid, explain it like you would to a 3 year old.
That clear enough? Or do I need to define single payer and explain what obamacare does?
Not at all, in fact.
It IS one of the talking points in the propaganda effort to obscure the truth. Thanks for playing. -
Kind of like your worthless links to healthcare.gov ?2001400ex said:
Lol typical. Can't ever explain an actual point.sarktastic said:
what would be the point?2001400ex said:
Then enlighten me as to "the truth".sarktastic said:
No.2001400ex said:
Yes, isn't that the goal of the insurance exchanges?sarktastic said:
Why not try competition, instead?2001400ex said:
To answer your question, going to single payer would be better for the common man. And Obama/Democrats made it more difficult.pawz said:
Slowly now....2001400ex said:
My head hurts after reading that. You truly are just fucking stupid.pawz said:
Please to be explaining why this is a good thing.2001400ex said:
The fact you can't see how obamacare just added 30 million people to private insurance companies and made it harder to go single payer tells us all we need to know about your education level.pawz said:
The fact that you can't see how obamacare is the first step down that slippery slope tells us all we need to know about your level of education.2001400ex said:
Talk to me when Obama single handedly turns America into a communism.CuntWaffle said:But I've been told socialism is fair and works?
Hondo? True?
I'm very clear on my education level.
That being said, a dude who gives up his million dollar a year compensation has to change his lifestyle. Shocking.
Education level indeed.
You might not actually be a shill for the left. You're a shill for the health insurance lobby. Obamacare is your pet issue.
Makes more sense now. LEAVE!!
Why is it good for the common man to make a single payer system more difficult to attain?
Or you could tell the truth and admit your position is indefensible - except by someone with an ulterior, fiscal motive.
Since I'm (allegedly) so fucking stupid, explain it like you would to a 3 year old.
That clear enough? Or do I need to define single payer and explain what obamacare does?
Not at all, in fact.
It IS one of the talking points in the propaganda effort to obscure the truth. Thanks for playing. -
Where does it say his orders went up?AZDuck said:I think it's hilarious that a guy was inspired by Christianity to give all his employees $70K wages in the private sector and (right-wing) people are piling on him because three of his executives quit even though his company's orders went up 300% because of the resulting publicity.
Let the fucking free market work
The Times said Price has dozens of new clients inspired by his move but those accounts won’t start generating profits for at least another year.
Looks like he picked up dozens ... who aren't profitable out of the gate, which means he fucked up even worse than expected.
With all that said, I hope he is banging the sundress maiden: -
Who is piling on him? He's admitting failure and lost his best people. Its his bidness.
-
Now more than ever2001400ex said:
Lol typical. Can't ever explain an actual point.sarktastic said:
what would be the point?2001400ex said:
Then enlighten me as to "the truth".sarktastic said:
No.2001400ex said:
Yes, isn't that the goal of the insurance exchanges?sarktastic said:
Why not try competition, instead?2001400ex said:
To answer your question, going to single payer would be better for the common man. And Obama/Democrats made it more difficult.pawz said:
Slowly now....2001400ex said:
My head hurts after reading that. You truly are just fucking stupid.pawz said:
Please to be explaining why this is a good thing.2001400ex said:
The fact you can't see how obamacare just added 30 million people to private insurance companies and made it harder to go single payer tells us all we need to know about your education level.pawz said:
The fact that you can't see how obamacare is the first step down that slippery slope tells us all we need to know about your level of education.2001400ex said:
Talk to me when Obama single handedly turns America into a communism.CuntWaffle said:But I've been told socialism is fair and works?
Hondo? True?
I'm very clear on my education level.
That being said, a dude who gives up his million dollar a year compensation has to change his lifestyle. Shocking.
Education level indeed.
You might not actually be a shill for the left. You're a shill for the health insurance lobby. Obamacare is your pet issue.
Makes more sense now. LEAVE!!
Why is it good for the common man to make a single payer system more difficult to attain?
Or you could tell the truth and admit your position is indefensible - except by someone with an ulterior, fiscal motive.
Since I'm (allegedly) so fucking stupid, explain it like you would to a 3 year old.
That clear enough? Or do I need to define single payer and explain what obamacare does?
Not at all, in fact.
It IS one of the talking points in the propaganda effort to obscure the truth. Thanks for playing.
Pot.Meet.Kettle -
This thread. It sucks.
-
Without question the high point of the thread.topdawgnc said:
Low point: Honda dick slapping all over the place. -
Swaye said: