Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

More Big 12 Rumors

CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 31,033 Founders Club
Apparently Oklahoma was interested in joining the B1G10 back in 2010. There's speculation they might try again, taking Kansas with them.

Texas would possibly look to the PAC12 because ATM (ROFL) would prevent them from joining the SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC.

If all that happens, the PAC would need to take 1 or 3 other Big12 schools. I vote for Baylor, Texas Tech and Okie St. TCU gets left behind just to piss of Tequilla.

I'd post a link but hookers.blow.90mph
«134

Comments

  • BallSackedBallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/oklahoma-nebraska-texas-a-m-kansas-and-iowa-state-sought-to-join-big-ten-in-2010-072615

    Big12 is a deck fest. This could just be a leak by Oklahomo to gain leverage over the course of the B12 realignment.
  • whlinderwhlinder Member Posts: 5,021 Standard Supporter
    edited July 2015
    When you're a 16 team conference, you're effectively two 8 team conferences with some pre-determined "non-conference" games against the other half of your conference. And then you have a championship game.

    For us though getting back to the Pac-8 would be cool. Not that the Arizona schools/Utah/Colorado would let it happen.
  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,566 Founders Club
    okie state goes with OU whereever they go, but yes otherwise it could play out like that.

    Texas really pissed in the well with their demands back in 2010
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    But Pac12 libs would never take Baylor because we hate money and success.

    No way Texas is coming without at least one other Texas school so I'd say Texas and Tech.

    I'm not NTD, BB'ing over adding Texas again though. I have full faith in Larry Scott to fuck this up.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    It would have been cool a few years ago if the Oklahoma schools and Texas/A&M would have come over. But Texas being Texas, they would rather be a conference of one than join another conferences network.
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    New World Order
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804

    Apparently Oklahoma was interested in joining the B1G10 back in 2010. There's speculation they might try again, taking Kansas with them.

    Texas would possibly look to the PAC12 because ATM (ROFL) would prevent them from joining the SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC.

    If all that happens, the PAC would need to take 1 or 3 other Big12 schools. I vote for Baylor, Texas Tech and Okie St. TCU gets left behind just to piss of Tequilla.

    I'd post a link but hookers.blow.90mph

    I know you're being sarcastic, but taking Tech over TCU would be an abomination.
  • HippopeteamusHippopeteamus Member Posts: 1,958

    Apparently Oklahoma was interested in joining the B1G10 back in 2010. There's speculation they might try again, taking Kansas with them.

    Texas would possibly look to the PAC12 because ATM (ROFL) would prevent them from joining the SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC.

    If all that happens, the PAC would need to take 1 or 3 other Big12 schools. I vote for Baylor, Texas Tech and Okie St. TCU gets left behind just to piss of Tequilla.

    I'd post a link but hookers.blow.90mph

    I know you're being sarcastic, but taking Tech over TCU would be an abomination.
    TCU will never be accepted into the pac-?? because of the C in TCU
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 31,033 Founders Club
    whlinder said:

    When you're a 16 team conference, you're effectively two 8 team conferences with some pre-determined "non-conference" games against the other half of your conference. And then you have a championship game.

    For us though getting back to the Pac-8 would be cool. Not the Arizona schools/Utah/Colorado would let it happen.

    7 games vs division opponents.
    2-3 cross divisional games.
    2-3 traditional non-conference games in the patented A-B-C format.
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    brchco12 said:

    i dont think we fucked that up, Texas wanted their exclusive TV deal, we said sorry no thanks.

    Texas, TCU, Tech, maybe U of H for the market.

    make it 2 divisions, Pacific and SW.

    SW
    Texas
    TCU
    Tech
    U of H
    Colorado
    Utah
    Arizona
    Arizona State

    Pacific
    UW
    WSU
    Oregon
    OSU
    Cal
    Stanford
    UCLA
    USC

    would have been great

    Honestly UH is going to be really desirable. Great new stadium, huge market, and Urb's OC taking over the program.
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    whlinder said:

    When you're a 16 team conference, you're effectively two 8 team conferences with some pre-determined "non-conference" games against the other half of your conference. And then you have a championship game.

    For us though getting back to the Pac-8 would be cool. Not the Arizona schools/Utah/Colorado would let it happen.

    The way to do it is have four 4-team pods.

    UW-UO-OSU-WSU
    USC-UCLA-UA-ASU
    SU-Cal-UT-Rice (academis pod)
    CU-UU-OSU-TCU

    Each pod is paired with one other pod to form an 8 team division. Rotate the pairings every year.
  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,566 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    brchco12 said:

    i dont think we fucked that up, Texas wanted their exclusive TV deal, we said sorry no thanks.

    Texas, TCU, Tech, maybe U of H for the market.

    make it 2 divisions, Pacific and SW.

    SW
    Texas
    TCU
    Tech
    U of H
    Colorado
    Utah
    Arizona
    Arizona State

    Pacific
    UW
    WSU
    Oregon
    OSU
    Cal
    Stanford
    UCLA
    USC

    would have been great

    Not getting Texas wasn't the fuckup. Taking Utah and Colorado before you had Texas was the fuckup.
    you think Texas would have given up the Longhorn Network? even though it's been a flop, that was $100M at the time
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    I'd rather have San Jose St or UTEP over Pacific
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    brchco12 said:

    dnc said:

    brchco12 said:

    i dont think we fucked that up, Texas wanted their exclusive TV deal, we said sorry no thanks.

    Texas, TCU, Tech, maybe U of H for the market.

    make it 2 divisions, Pacific and SW.

    SW
    Texas
    TCU
    Tech
    U of H
    Colorado
    Utah
    Arizona
    Arizona State

    Pacific
    UW
    WSU
    Oregon
    OSU
    Cal
    Stanford
    UCLA
    USC

    would have been great

    Not getting Texas wasn't the fuckup. Taking Utah and Colorado before you had Texas was the fuckup.
    you think Texas would have given up the Longhorn Network? even though it's been a flop, that was $100M at the time
    I doubt it.

    I wouldn't have taken Utah and Colorado without Texas though.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    whlinder said:

    When you're a 16 team conference, you're effectively two 8 team conferences with some pre-determined "non-conference" games against the other half of your conference. And then you have a championship game.

    For us though getting back to the Pac-8 would be cool. Not the Arizona schools/Utah/Colorado would let it happen.

    The way to do it is have four 4-team pods.

    UW-UO-OSU-WSU
    USC-UCLA-UA-ASU
    SU-Cal-UT-Rice (academis pod)
    CU-UU-OSU-TCU

    Each pod is paired with one other pod to form an 8 team division. Rotate the pairings every year.
    WTF'd for a pod that isn't the four California schools together.

    They made a pod of their own in the current Pac-12.
Sign In or Register to comment.