More Big 12 Rumors
Texas would possibly look to the PAC12 because ATM (ROFL) would prevent them from joining the SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC.
If all that happens, the PAC would need to take 1 or 3 other Big12 schools. I vote for Baylor, Texas Tech and Okie St. TCU gets left behind just to piss of Tequilla.
I'd post a link but hookers.blow.90mph
Comments
-
http://www.foxsports.com/college-football/outkick-the-coverage/oklahoma-nebraska-texas-a-m-kansas-and-iowa-state-sought-to-join-big-ten-in-2010-072615
Big12 is a deck fest. This could just be a leak by Oklahomo to gain leverage over the course of the B12 realignment. -
When you're a 16 team conference, you're effectively two 8 team conferences with some pre-determined "non-conference" games against the other half of your conference. And then you have a championship game.
For us though getting back to the Pac-8 would be cool. Not that the Arizona schools/Utah/Colorado would let it happen. -
okie state goes with OU whereever they go, but yes otherwise it could play out like that.
Texas really pissed in the well with their demands back in 2010 -
But Pac12 libs would never take Baylor because we hate money and success.
No way Texas is coming without at least one other Texas school so I'd say Texas and Tech.
I'm not NTD, BB'ing over adding Texas again though. I have full faith in Larry Scott to fuck this up. -
It would have been cool a few years ago if the Oklahoma schools and Texas/A&M would have come over. But Texas being Texas, they would rather be a conference of one than join another conferences network.
-
New World Order
-
I know you're being sarcastic, but taking Tech over TCU would be an abomination.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Apparently Oklahoma was interested in joining the B1G10 back in 2010. There's speculation they might try again, taking Kansas with them.
Texas would possibly look to the PAC12 because ATM (ROFL) would prevent them from joining the SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC.
If all that happens, the PAC would need to take 1 or 3 other Big12 schools. I vote for Baylor, Texas Tech and Okie St. TCU gets left behind just to piss of Tequilla.
I'd post a link but hookers.blow.90mph
-
i dont think we fucked that up, Texas wanted their exclusive TV deal, we said sorry no thanks.
Texas, TCU, Tech, maybe U of H for the market.
make it 2 divisions, Pacific and SW.
SW
Texas
TCU
Tech
U of H
Colorado
Utah
Arizona
Arizona State
Pacific
UW
WSU
Oregon
OSU
Cal
Stanford
UCLA
USC
would have been great -
TCU will never be accepted into the pac-?? because of the C in TCUWilburHooksHands said:
I know you're being sarcastic, but taking Tech over TCU would be an abomination.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Apparently Oklahoma was interested in joining the B1G10 back in 2010. There's speculation they might try again, taking Kansas with them.
Texas would possibly look to the PAC12 because ATM (ROFL) would prevent them from joining the SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC.
If all that happens, the PAC would need to take 1 or 3 other Big12 schools. I vote for Baylor, Texas Tech and Okie St. TCU gets left behind just to piss of Tequilla.
I'd post a link but hookers.blow.90mph
-
7 games vs division opponents.whlinder said:When you're a 16 team conference, you're effectively two 8 team conferences with some pre-determined "non-conference" games against the other half of your conference. And then you have a championship game.
For us though getting back to the Pac-8 would be cool. Not the Arizona schools/Utah/Colorado would let it happen.
2-3 cross divisional games.
2-3 traditional non-conference games in the patented A-B-C format. -
Honestly UH is going to be really desirable. Great new stadium, huge market, and Urb's OC taking over the program.brchco12 said:i dont think we fucked that up, Texas wanted their exclusive TV deal, we said sorry no thanks.
Texas, TCU, Tech, maybe U of H for the market.
make it 2 divisions, Pacific and SW.
SW
Texas
TCU
Tech
U of H
Colorado
Utah
Arizona
Arizona State
Pacific
UW
WSU
Oregon
OSU
Cal
Stanford
UCLA
USC
would have been great
-
The way to do it is have four 4-team pods.whlinder said:When you're a 16 team conference, you're effectively two 8 team conferences with some pre-determined "non-conference" games against the other half of your conference. And then you have a championship game.
For us though getting back to the Pac-8 would be cool. Not the Arizona schools/Utah/Colorado would let it happen.
UW-UO-OSU-WSU
USC-UCLA-UA-ASU
SU-Cal-UT-Rice (academis pod)
CU-UU-OSU-TCU
Each pod is paired with one other pod to form an 8 team division. Rotate the pairings every year. -
Not getting Texas wasn't the fuckup. Taking Utah and Colorado before you had Texas was the fuckup.brchco12 said:i dont think we fucked that up, Texas wanted their exclusive TV deal, we said sorry no thanks.
Texas, TCU, Tech, maybe U of H for the market.
make it 2 divisions, Pacific and SW.
SW
Texas
TCU
Tech
U of H
Colorado
Utah
Arizona
Arizona State
Pacific
UW
WSU
Oregon
OSU
Cal
Stanford
UCLA
USC
would have been great -
you think Texas would have given up the Longhorn Network? even though it's been a flop, that was $100M at the timednc said:
Not getting Texas wasn't the fuckup. Taking Utah and Colorado before you had Texas was the fuckup.brchco12 said:i dont think we fucked that up, Texas wanted their exclusive TV deal, we said sorry no thanks.
Texas, TCU, Tech, maybe U of H for the market.
make it 2 divisions, Pacific and SW.
SW
Texas
TCU
Tech
U of H
Colorado
Utah
Arizona
Arizona State
Pacific
UW
WSU
Oregon
OSU
Cal
Stanford
UCLA
USC
would have been great -
I'd rather have San Jose St or UTEP over Pacific
-
was the name of the division you foolsarktastic said:I'd rather have San Jose St or UTEP over Pacific
-
I doubt it.brchco12 said:
you think Texas would have given up the Longhorn Network? even though it's been a flop, that was $100M at the timednc said:
Not getting Texas wasn't the fuckup. Taking Utah and Colorado before you had Texas was the fuckup.brchco12 said:i dont think we fucked that up, Texas wanted their exclusive TV deal, we said sorry no thanks.
Texas, TCU, Tech, maybe U of H for the market.
make it 2 divisions, Pacific and SW.
SW
Texas
TCU
Tech
U of H
Colorado
Utah
Arizona
Arizona State
Pacific
UW
WSU
Oregon
OSU
Cal
Stanford
UCLA
USC
would have been great
I wouldn't have taken Utah and Colorado without Texas though. -
FremontTroll said:
The way to do it is have four 4-team pods.whlinder said:When you're a 16 team conference, you're effectively two 8 team conferences with some pre-determined "non-conference" games against the other half of your conference. And then you have a championship game.
For us though getting back to the Pac-8 would be cool. Not the Arizona schools/Utah/Colorado would let it happen.
UW-UO-OSU-WSU
USC-UCLA-UA-ASU
SU-Cal-UT-Rice (academis pod)
CU-UU-OSU-TCU
Each pod is paired with one other pod to form an 8 team division. Rotate the pairings every year.
-
Good. We don't want to be part of your stupid conference, you heathens. Games starting at midnight on a channel that no one gets. smhdnc said:But Pac12 libs would never take Baylor because we hate money and success.
No way Texas is coming without at least one other Texas school so I'd say Texas and Tech.
I'm not NTD, BB'ing over adding Texas again though. I have full faith in Larry Scott to fuck this up. -
WTF'd for a pod that isn't the four California schools together.FremontTroll said:
The way to do it is have four 4-team pods.whlinder said:When you're a 16 team conference, you're effectively two 8 team conferences with some pre-determined "non-conference" games against the other half of your conference. And then you have a championship game.
For us though getting back to the Pac-8 would be cool. Not the Arizona schools/Utah/Colorado would let it happen.
UW-UO-OSU-WSU
USC-UCLA-UA-ASU
SU-Cal-UT-Rice (academis pod)
CU-UU-OSU-TCU
Each pod is paired with one other pod to form an 8 team division. Rotate the pairings every year.
They made a pod of their own in the current Pac-12. -
WTF'ed for many things. But mostly for Rice.FremontTroll said:
The way to do it is have four 4-team pods.whlinder said:When you're a 16 team conference, you're effectively two 8 team conferences with some pre-determined "non-conference" games against the other half of your conference. And then you have a championship game.
For us though getting back to the Pac-8 would be cool. Not the Arizona schools/Utah/Colorado would let it happen.
UW-UO-OSU-WSU
USC-UCLA-UA-ASU
SU-Cal-UT-Rice (academis pod)
CU-UU-OSU-TCU
Each pod is paired with one other pod to form an 8 team division. Rotate the pairings every year.
-
There's room for negotiation:Hippopeteamus said:
TCU will never be accepted into the pac-?? because of the C in TCUWilburHooksHands said:
I know you're being sarcastic, but taking Tech over TCU would be an abomination.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Apparently Oklahoma was interested in joining the B1G10 back in 2010. There's speculation they might try again, taking Kansas with them.
Texas would possibly look to the PAC12 because ATM (ROFL) would prevent them from joining the SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC.
If all that happens, the PAC would need to take 1 or 3 other Big12 schools. I vote for Baylor, Texas Tech and Okie St. TCU gets left behind just to piss of Tequilla.
I'd post a link but hookers.blow.90mph
-
Fuck pods. That's all I have to say on this topic.
-
oh, oh... 'somebody' is taking this board way way too seriously... againwhatshouldicareabout said:
was the name of the division you foolsarktastic said:I'd rather have San Jose St or UTEP over Pacific
-
-
Fuck Texas. They're too scared to join the SEC. Sounds perfect for the PAC.
-
-
Yeah that's the way it would probably end up.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
WTF'd for a pod that isn't the four California schools together.FremontTroll said:
The way to do it is have four 4-team pods.whlinder said:When you're a 16 team conference, you're effectively two 8 team conferences with some pre-determined "non-conference" games against the other half of your conference. And then you have a championship game.
For us though getting back to the Pac-8 would be cool. Not the Arizona schools/Utah/Colorado would let it happen.
UW-UO-OSU-WSU
USC-UCLA-UA-ASU
SU-Cal-UT-Rice (academis pod)
CU-UU-OSU-TCU
Each pod is paired with one other pod to form an 8 team division. Rotate the pairings every year.
They made a pod of their own in the current Pac-12.
For the sake of balance and spreading out the Cali schools I would prefer they get split up. -
TCU Is absolutely stacked. That broad is actually like a 7 there. I think I mentioned before, but one of the funniest things I've ever seen was being at the hotel bar in LA for the TCU/Wisco Rose Bowl. Watching Wisconsin guys get a look at TCU co-eds was special.PurpleThrobber said:
There's room for negotiation:Hippopeteamus said:
TCU will never be accepted into the pac-?? because of the C in TCUWilburHooksHands said:
I know you're being sarcastic, but taking Tech over TCU would be an abomination.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:Apparently Oklahoma was interested in joining the B1G10 back in 2010. There's speculation they might try again, taking Kansas with them.
Texas would possibly look to the PAC12 because ATM (ROFL) would prevent them from joining the SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC.
If all that happens, the PAC would need to take 1 or 3 other Big12 schools. I vote for Baylor, Texas Tech and Okie St. TCU gets left behind just to piss of Tequilla.
I'd post a link but hookers.blow.90mph
edit: #MyFrawgs -
I laffed so hard a little shit came out.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
