How refreshing to see a national writer know his shit and do actual research before posting an article like this. It was very well done. Compare that with that dreck the ESPN P12 beat writer said about how shocking and bad it was Cyler Miles retired. So hell yes, boobs, SBNation is my source.
I'm surprised that you're surprised that the Huskies were consistently inconsistent last year.
The 2015 team was still made up of Seven's recruits and they were invariably consistently inconsistent under him so ideally that will change in 2016 and they'll be start to improve the quality consistency of their play.
I didn't realize we were so inconsistent and unpredictable last season. That's amazing how much it variation there is from week to week.
Is it weird that I have no recollection whatsoever of the Illinois game last year. I can remember something about every other game. I totally forgot we played them.
Also, that chart really shows me something positive. We were getting better toward the end. The bowel game was a weird anomaly.
UCLA everyone was out.
Kind of interesting stuff.
This inconsistency is a reason I don't think we are going to be so bad this year. It's not like our best players were just going up and down like that. It was really the totality of the team that looked good or horrible last year depending on the week.
I'm surprised that you're surprised that the Huskies were consistently inconsistent last year.
The 2015 team was still made up of Seven's recruits and they were invariably consistently inconsistent under him so ideally that will change in 2016 and they'll be start to improve the quality consistency of their play.
Comments
I didn't realize we were so inconsistent and unpredictable last season. That's amazing how much it variation there is from week to week.
The 2015 team was still made up of Seven's recruits and they were invariably consistently inconsistent under him so ideally that will change in 2016 and they'll be start to improve the quality consistency of their play.
e
Also, that chart really shows me something positive. We were getting better toward the end. The bowel game was a weird anomaly.
UCLA everyone was out.
Kind of interesting stuff.
This inconsistency is a reason I don't think we are going to be so bad this year. It's not like our best players were just going up and down like that. It was really the totality of the team that looked good or horrible last year depending on the week.
I remain optimistic for 7-8 wins.
I couldn't agree more with any of it. The reason why I don't really wince at losing all our great players is the whole vs sum-of-parts issue.
Last year when we were good or bad, it was about the whole, not the sum.
That was a great article. It really sums everything up perfectly.