Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hot NBA talk

2»

Comments

  • vadawgvadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 467 Swaye's Wigwam
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,746

    T Mac in his prime before the back injuries might have been better than Kobe. Kobe was probably better, but I remember it being a debate back in 2002 or 2003. He was nice when he played for Orlando.

    Just because people debated it doesn't mean it was an actual debate. Once upon a time people debated James Atoe's first round potential as well.

    T Mac was very good, perhaps hall worthy. He was never in Kobe's class.

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    T Mac in his prime before the back injuries might have been better than Kobe. Kobe was probably better, but I remember it being a debate back in 2002 or 2003. He was nice when he played for Orlando.

    Are we talking actual people or mouthbreathing morons like Stephen A Smith and Skip Bayless?
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499

    T Mac in his prime before the back injuries might have been better than Kobe. Kobe was probably better, but I remember it being a debate back in 2002 or 2003. He was nice when he played for Orlando.

    Are we talking actual people or mouthbreathing morons like Stephen A Smith and Skip Bayless?
    I find calling Stephen A Smith a "mouthbreather" is extremely racist. Are you suggesting he is taking all the white man's air?

    Also Skip Bayless is better at life than you.

    HTH.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    dnc said:

    T Mac in his prime before the back injuries might have been better than Kobe. Kobe was probably better, but I remember it being a debate back in 2002 or 2003. He was nice when he played for Orlando.

    Just because people debated it doesn't mean it was an actual debate. Once upon a time people debated James Atoe's first round potential as well.

    T Mac was very good, perhaps hall worthy. He was never in Kobe's class.

    Kobe obviously has had a better career, and was probably a little better from 2001 to 2004, but it was not by a large margin. I don't think it was all that crazy of a debate for a few years. McGrady was really, really good when he was on the Magic. If not for all the injury issues, he would be a sure fire Hall of Famer.

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    dnc said:

    T Mac in his prime before the back injuries might have been better than Kobe. Kobe was probably better, but I remember it being a debate back in 2002 or 2003. He was nice when he played for Orlando.

    Just because people debated it doesn't mean it was an actual debate. Once upon a time people debated James Atoe's first round potential as well.

    T Mac was very good, perhaps hall worthy. He was never in Kobe's class.

    Kobe obviously has had a better career, and was probably a little better from 2001 to 2004, but it was not by a large margin. I don't think it was all that crazy of a debate for a few years. McGrady was really, really good when he was on the Magic. If not for all the injury issues, he would be a sure fire Hall of Famer.

    In related news, Sark would have been 9-4 or 10-3 last year without all the OL injuries.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    dnc said:

    T Mac in his prime before the back injuries might have been better than Kobe. Kobe was probably better, but I remember it being a debate back in 2002 or 2003. He was nice when he played for Orlando.

    Just because people debated it doesn't mean it was an actual debate. Once upon a time people debated James Atoe's first round potential as well.

    T Mac was very good, perhaps hall worthy. He was never in Kobe's class.

    Kobe obviously has had a better career, and was probably a little better from 2001 to 2004, but it was not by a large margin. I don't think it was all that crazy of a debate for a few years. McGrady was really, really good when he was on the Magic. If not for all the injury issues, he would be a sure fire Hall of Famer.

    In related news, Sark would have been 9-4 or 10-3 last year without all the OL injuries.
    Exactly.

  • vadawgvadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 467 Swaye's Wigwam
    Who cares....Who cares.......?
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,185 Swaye's Wigwam
    vadawg said:

    Who cares....Who cares.......?

    Obviously you do since you've posted this shit twice
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    vadawg said:

    Who cares....Who cares.......?

    I will remember to post "who cares" on all your government conspiracy posts you seem to be fond of. It's a harmless basketball post, get the fuck over it.

  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    I like how Cuntwaffle thumbs up the first "Who cares" then reported the second one as spam.

    Auburn Doog would be proud of your flip flopping there.
  • vadawgvadawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 467 Swaye's Wigwam
    Who cares X 3?.......just wondering.

    vadawg said:

    Who cares....Who cares.......?

    I will remember to post "who cares" on all your government conspiracy posts you seem to be fond of. It's a harmless basketball post, get the fuck over it.

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,012 Founders Club
    I do. OK? NBA talk built this board
Sign In or Register to comment.