Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Rashard Lawrence (2016, Top 5 national DT, Louisiana)

124»

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    Past performance is not indicative of future success
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,400
    I'll be watching the Stanford / USC game closely to see if we have a reasonable chance of taking one from them down there.

    Stanford's OL has declined from 2013 to 2014 and then again to this year plus their WRs corp misses Ty Montgomery. Their true frosh Bryce Love is dangerous though.

    Looks like Vegas is projecting a 31-20 USC victory...they last played USC in 2013 and lost 20-17 @ USC then (doesn't matter too much but still interesting).

    So IMHO, we finally pass Stanford in the next year or two while I don't think we challenge Oregon consistently until next year at the earliest and probably 2017 when we get them back @ Husky Stadium when Browning is a Junior.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    I want to see the growth in our offense over the next 2-3 games. If the offense can get to the 30 point range (huge stretch), then I think this is a year where we can hold the Oregon offense to the 20s or low 30s. I'm not ready to write this year off yet in that regards. Particularly depending on what happens with a few of the games leading up to that game with Oregon having a very physical game against Utah on the docket.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,144
    HFNY said:

    I'll be watching the Stanford / USC game closely to see if we have a reasonable chance of taking one from them down there.

    Stanford's OL has declined from 2013 to 2014 and then again to this year plus their WRs corp misses Ty Montgomery. Their true frosh Bryce Love is dangerous though.

    Looks like Vegas is projecting a 31-20 USC victory...they last played USC in 2013 and lost 20-17 @ USC then (doesn't matter too much but still interesting).

    So IMHO, we finally pass Stanford in the next year or two while I don't think we challenge Oregon consistently until next year at the earliest and probably 2017 when we get them back @ Husky Stadium when Browning is a Junior.

    We should have a chance against Stanford. It will probably be a really ugly, low scoring game. Both teams have worthless offenses and good defenses.

    SC is breaking out the plunger on us.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,102
    RoadDawg55 said:

    HFNY said:

    I'll be watching the Stanford / USC game closely to see if we have a reasonable chance of taking one from them down there.

    Stanford's OL has declined from 2013 to 2014 and then again to this year plus their WRs corp misses Ty Montgomery. Their true frosh Bryce Love is dangerous though.

    Looks like Vegas is projecting a 31-20 USC victory...they last played USC in 2013 and lost 20-17 @ USC then (doesn't matter too much but still interesting).

    So IMHO, we finally pass Stanford in the next year or two while I don't think we challenge Oregon consistently until next year at the earliest and probably 2017 when we get them back @ Husky Stadium when Browning is a Junior.

    We should have a chance against Stanford. It will probably be a really ugly, low scoring game. Both teams have worthless offenses and good defenses.

    SC is breaking out the plunger on us.
    Cal should be a decent measuring stick game for us.

    I really do think that we have a chance to have a Top 3 in the conference defense this year. If we do, I'd be very surprised if we have the plunger broken out on us this year ... and if we do no more than once. Agree though that SC would be a potential likely spot for that to occur.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    RoadDawg55 said:

    HFNY said:

    I'll be watching the Stanford / USC game closely to see if we have a reasonable chance of taking one from them down there.

    Stanford's OL has declined from 2013 to 2014 and then again to this year plus their WRs corp misses Ty Montgomery. Their true frosh Bryce Love is dangerous though.

    Looks like Vegas is projecting a 31-20 USC victory...they last played USC in 2013 and lost 20-17 @ USC then (doesn't matter too much but still interesting).

    So IMHO, we finally pass Stanford in the next year or two while I don't think we challenge Oregon consistently until next year at the earliest and probably 2017 when we get them back @ Husky Stadium when Browning is a Junior.

    We should have a chance against Stanford. It will probably be a really ugly, low scoring game. Both teams have worthless offenses and good defenses.

    SC is breaking out the plunger on us.
    The SC plunger is script sadly, especially with Sark on a Thursday night. If he's still around next year though the script flips.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    HFNY said:

    I'll be watching the Stanford / USC game closely to see if we have a reasonable chance of taking one from them down there.

    Stanford's OL has declined from 2013 to 2014 and then again to this year plus their WRs corp misses Ty Montgomery. Their true frosh Bryce Love is dangerous though.

    Looks like Vegas is projecting a 31-20 USC victory...they last played USC in 2013 and lost 20-17 @ USC then (doesn't matter too much but still interesting).

    So IMHO, we finally pass Stanford in the next year or two while I don't think we challenge Oregon consistently until next year at the earliest and probably 2017 when we get them back @ Husky Stadium when Browning is a Junior.

    We should have a chance against Stanford. It will probably be a really ugly, low scoring game. Both teams have worthless offenses and good defenses.

    SC is breaking out the plunger on us.
    The SC plunger is script sadly, especially with Sark on a Thursday night. If he's still around next year though the script flips.
    Couldn't have said it better, Coke.

    SC is plunger worthy. Hate the matchup and Cutty will be ready. Lose by 14+.

    The Furd is an ugly, but winnable game if the offense can score a TD or two. The UW defense matches up well.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,144
    MisterEm said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    HFNY said:

    I'll be watching the Stanford / USC game closely to see if we have a reasonable chance of taking one from them down there.

    Stanford's OL has declined from 2013 to 2014 and then again to this year plus their WRs corp misses Ty Montgomery. Their true frosh Bryce Love is dangerous though.

    Looks like Vegas is projecting a 31-20 USC victory...they last played USC in 2013 and lost 20-17 @ USC then (doesn't matter too much but still interesting).

    So IMHO, we finally pass Stanford in the next year or two while I don't think we challenge Oregon consistently until next year at the earliest and probably 2017 when we get them back @ Husky Stadium when Browning is a Junior.

    We should have a chance against Stanford. It will probably be a really ugly, low scoring game. Both teams have worthless offenses and good defenses.

    SC is breaking out the plunger on us.
    The SC plunger is script sadly, especially with Sark on a Thursday night. If he's still around next year though the script flips.
    Couldn't have said it better, Coke.

    SC is plunger worthy. Hate the matchup and Cutty will be ready. Lose by 14+.

    The Furd is an ugly, but winnable game if the offense can score a TD or two. The UW defense matches up well.
    We might have jumped the gun on the SC game. It's still going to be tough to get a win.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter