Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Auburndawg's Preseason PAC-12 Power Rankings!

Just a couple of notes for the uninitiated. These are the official PAC-12 Power Rankings and will be updated after the end of the last PAC-12 game each week. Immitation is not appreciated. Also, Power Rankings are not the same thing as the current standings, but rather reflects how well each team is playing at that moment. Strength of opponents matters. Finally, keep in mind that gaps between teams matter. With that, here we go:

Auburndawg sees two distinct tiers in the PAC to begin the season, and, unfortunately, until proven otherwise, Duckdynasty and the usurpers from Palo Alto remain on top.

1. Oregon. It burns Auburndawg's fingers to have to type that. Someone make them go away.
2. Stanford.
T3. WASHINGTON, USC, UCLA. Three teams with major talent and major coaching questions. If sanity is to return and LA and Seattle are to resume their rightful place as the centers of power in west coast football, pray that Sark, Mora and Kiffin mature into coaches worthy of these three great football schools.
T6. Oregon State, ASU. Less elite talent, but solid coaching.



8. Utah. Very little real PAC-12 talent. But these guys are well coached and not use to losing. Yet.
9. Arizona. Carey makes them dangerous

10. Cal. Remember when Tedford was a genius?




11. WSU. The only drama here is, when does the Pirate King of Poop Island implode?


12. Colorado. Still suffering a Skippy hangover.
«13

Comments

  • 4321DAWGS4321DAWGS Member Posts: 98
    nobody gives a shit exceot auburndawg
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,006 Founders Club
    UW does not have major talent
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Wait Colorado still blames Rick even tho they went to a BCS game afte his departure???
  • Mad_SonMad_Son Member Posts: 10,180
    1) Oregon
    2) Stanford
    3) UCLA
    4) USC
    5) OSU
    T6) ASU/UW
    8) Arizona
    9) Cal
    10) Utah
    11) WSU
    12) Colorado
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    anyone putting UW above ASU and UCLA is crazy. And BTW Utah sux, and Arizona is way better
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited August 2013
    Arizona won 8 games and plungered us last year. And Rich Rod>Sark. Should be above us.
  • AuburndawgAuburndawg Member Posts: 362
    This is not last year. Add Tanigawa, Jamora, Callier, Riva, Kevin Smith, maybe Kohler at some point, and a year of experience to last year's team. We return more starters than anyone else.

    Sorry to be positive, but even Sark is going to have hard time screwing this team up.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 0
    edited August 2013
    Returning starters is one of the most overrated stats in CFB. Our coaches didn't change, our talent didn't change. We just keep the same mediocre players and coaches for another year.
  • AuburndawgAuburndawg Member Posts: 362

    Returning starters is one of the most overrated stats in CFB. .

    Right. Because 19 year old freshmen don't improve once they become 22 year old SRs.
  • BlackieBlackie Member Posts: 499
    "reflects how well each team is playing at that moment. Strength of opponents matters."

    Dave, you motherfucking imbecile. The season hasn't started yet.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    I think you're sleeping on ASU. And I still have no idea why utah is so high
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    dhdawg said:

    I think you're sleeping on ASU. And I still have no idea why utah is so high

    dh=dickhead?

    just curious.
  • Steve_BowmanSteve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    edited August 2013
    IF Tanigawa and Jamora are healthy, if. This is not a strong list. Shark can't screw this up?

    Steve couldn't pull the trigger on last year's Alabama team. He'd start throwing bubble screens and other goofy short passes thee to four plays of five in the second half. He'd stop running altoghter if he got behind. That's what he does.

    This is not last year. Add Tanigawa, Jamora, Callier, Riva, Kevin Smith, maybe Kohler at some point, and a year of experience to last year's team. We return more starters than anyone else.

    Sorry to be positive, but even Sark is going to have hard time screwing this team up.

  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,299 Founders Club

    IF Tanigawa and Jamora are healthy, if. This is not a strong list. Shark can't screw this up?

    Steve couldn't pull the trigger on last year's Alabama team. He'd start throwing bubble screens and other goofy short passes thee to four plays of five in the second half. He'd stop running altoghter if he got behind. That's what he does.

    This is not last year. Add Tanigawa, Jamora, Callier, Riva, Kevin Smith, maybe Kohler at some point, and a year of experience to last year's team. We return more starters than anyone else.

    Sorry to be positive, but even Sark is going to have hard time screwing this team up.

    Sark is a fucktarded play caller. Head scratchers appeared early 2009 and completely set in with that shit he called at Notre Dame. IMHO the Huskies have played just one "great" game under Sark, and that was vs #19 Cal at the end of the 2009 season. Unfortunately that turned out to be a complete head fake.
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    IF Tanigawa and Jamora are healthy, if. This is not a strong list. Shark can't screw this up?

    Steve couldn't pull the trigger on last year's Alabama team. He'd start throwing bubble screens and other goofy short passes thee to four plays of five in the second half. He'd stop running altoghter if he got behind. That's what he does.

    This is not last year. Add Tanigawa, Jamora, Callier, Riva, Kevin Smith, maybe Kohler at some point, and a year of experience to last year's team. We return more starters than anyone else.

    Sorry to be positive, but even Sark is going to have hard time screwing this team up.

    Sark is a fucktarded play caller. Head scratchers appeared early 2009 and completely set in with that shit he called at Notre Dame. IMHO the Huskies have played just one "great" game under Sark, and that was vs #19 Cal at the end of the 2009 season. Unfortunately that turned out to be a complete head fake.
    I for one can't wait to see our new up-tempo offense. They will go 3-and-out even faster than the old offense. But the defense won't mind, cuz we have so much depth now. #BestPlayCallerInAmerica
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,299 Founders Club

    IF Tanigawa and Jamora are healthy, if. This is not a strong list. Shark can't screw this up?

    Steve couldn't pull the trigger on last year's Alabama team. He'd start throwing bubble screens and other goofy short passes thee to four plays of five in the second half. He'd stop running altoghter if he got behind. That's what he does.

    This is not last year. Add Tanigawa, Jamora, Callier, Riva, Kevin Smith, maybe Kohler at some point, and a year of experience to last year's team. We return more starters than anyone else.

    Sorry to be positive, but even Sark is going to have hard time screwing this team up.

    Sark is a fucktarded play caller. Head scratchers appeared early 2009 and completely set in with that shit he called at Notre Dame. IMHO the Huskies have played just one "great" game under Sark, and that was vs #19 Cal at the end of the 2009 season. Unfortunately that turned out to be a complete head fake.
    I for one can't wait to see our new up-tempo offense. They will go 3-and-out even faster than the old offense. But the defense won't mind, cuz we have so much depth now. #BestPlayCallerInAmerica

    The plungers that will result will be remarkable. Should be the end of an error.
Sign In or Register to comment.