Coming on strong, its like he thinks everyone forgot about him being a fake war hero and fake lawyer or something
Things Libtards do to Avoid Having an Honest Debate:
1. Ad Hominem (Name-Calling aka alleged fake war hero, alleged fake attorney; with no proof of the allegation.) BULLYING... BUL LYING. Interesting. Take out the BUL and you're just plain Lying.
2. Distracting (aka “Pivoting” aka “Changing the Subject”)
"Sometimes, arguing with radicals seems like an exercise in futility. But remember, you’re not always arguing to change their minds, but the minds of rational people who are observing the debate, but are too timid to enter the discussion for fear of the Libtard attack tactics."
Derek doesn't like it when people hijack the thread, which you have done in this case. The subject is:
"Is Tommy a POS for bullying Puppy and then whining when Derek calls him out on it."
Tommy has not provided any evidence that Derek received a complaint from Puppy. He could have re-posted Derek's PM. Why didn't he? Instead, he just hung the allegation in the air with no supporting evidence. If he was an attorney, a judge would hand him his lunch for doing that. But what do I know? I'm just an alleged fake attorney, which you too provided no evidence.
Comments
The moral of the story is never cry shitwolf - Officer Lahey
Please take your own advice, POS.
I'm talking to you, muther fucker.
Please explain your logic?
1. Ad Hominem (Name-Calling aka alleged fake war hero, alleged fake attorney; with no proof of the allegation.) BULLYING...
BULLYING. Interesting. Take out the BUL and you're just plain Lying.2. Distracting (aka “Pivoting” aka “Changing the Subject”)
"Sometimes, arguing with radicals seems like an exercise in futility. But remember, you’re not always arguing to change their minds, but the minds of rational people who are observing the debate, but are too timid to enter the discussion for fear of the Libtard attack tactics."
Derek doesn't like it when people hijack the thread, which you have done in this case. The subject is: Tommy has not provided any evidence that Derek received a complaint from Puppy. He could have re-posted Derek's PM. Why didn't he? Instead, he just hung the allegation in the air with no supporting evidence. If he was an attorney, a judge would hand him his lunch for doing that. But what do I know? I'm just an alleged fake attorney, which you too provided no evidence.
A lot of that going around in here.
It's easier to keep the facts straight when you're not a compulsive liar.
Try it sometime.
*note to d2d, yes, that was name-calling.
He's going to run over your ass with his Rascal.