Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Rank the 2015 schedule in order of difficulty

GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
1. @ Arizona State*
2. Oregon
3. @ Stanford**
4. @ Boise State
5. Utah
6. @ USC
7. Utah State
8. @ Oregon State
9. Cal***
10. Arizona****
11. Sacramento State
12. WSU*****

* Until we finally beat them at that fucking place, I can't rank any lower.
** Comes 2 weeks after emotional @USC game and 1 week after Oregon game. Yikes..
*** Ranked too damn high, I know
**** I think they are very overrated and got extremely lucky many times last year. Traditionally UW is a house of horrors for them.
***** lol
«1

Comments

  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,537 Founders Club
    1. Whoregon (lol!)
    2. @ ASU
    3. @ Boise
    4. Utah
    5. @ USC
    6. @ Stanford
    7. @ Oregon St.
    8. Arizona
    9. Utah St.
    10. Cal
    11. WSU
    12. Sac St. (Who?)

    I expect us to struggle on the road, as usual.
  • RaccoonHarryRaccoonHarry Member Posts: 2,161
    edited May 2015
    I understand the disdain for Sark, shared by myself, but USC at #5 or #6 is too low. I think USC wins rather handily, say 34-17. I wish it were otherwise. I'd say that game is #3 in difficulty to Oregon and ASU.
  • BallSackedBallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    Utah too high
    SC too low
    Cal...too low. I think Cal will be improved. Their offense will upset someone this year in a shootout.
  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,297
    edited May 2015
    Gladstone said:

    1. @ Arizona State*
    2. Oregon
    3. @ Stanford**
    4. @ Boise State
    5. Utah
    6. @ USC
    7. Utah State
    8. @ Oregon State
    9. Cal***
    10. Arizona****
    11. Sacramento State
    12. WSU*****

    * Until we finally beat them at that fucking place, I can't rank any lower.
    ** Comes 2 weeks after emotional @USC game and 1 week after Oregon game. Yikes..
    *** Ranked too damn high, I know
    **** I think they are very overrated and got extremely lucky many times last year. Traditionally UW is a house of horrors for them.
    ***** lol

    Oregon
    @ Stanford
    @USC
    @ASU
    @BSU
    Arizona
    Utah
    Utah St
    Dreck - Cal
    Dreck - @ OSU
    Dreck.Dreck. Dreck. Dreck. Dreck. Stuid Fucking Cuogs.WSU
    Sac St

  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,537 Founders Club
    Thanks boobs for leaving OSU off. Hi Glove!
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited May 2015

    Utah too high
    SC too low
    Cal...too low. I think Cal will be improved. Their offense will upset someone this year in a shootout.

    Cal is Cal. They are going to be terrible. Sonny Dykes is still the coach and their defense will be horrible again.
  • BallSackedBallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    edited May 2015

    Utah too high
    SC too low
    Cal...too low. I think Cal will be improved. Their offense will upset someone this year in a shootout.

    Cal is Cal. They are going to be terrible. Sonny Dykes is still the coach and their defense will be horrible again.
    They'll probably go about 6-6 or some shit. But Goff is the best QB in the Conf (not Sugarshittube's boyfriend Cody). They got a very good set of receivers and two good running backs. Defense is garbage, and schedule is tough.

    Going out on a limb - They'll upset someone this year and put up huge offensive #s. Next year they'll go back to dumpster fire.
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    at Stanford
    at USC
    Oregon
    at ASU
    at Boise
    Arizona
    Utah
    Cal
    Utah St.
    at Oregon St
    WSU
    Sac St
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,574 Founders Club
    ASU
    Oregon
    USC
    Stanford
    Boise

    NOGAF about the rest.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    at Stanford
    at USC
    Oregon
    at ASU
    at Boise
    Arizona
    Utah
    Cal
    Utah St.
    at Oregon St
    WSU
    Sac St

    If @Stanford is the most difficult game on the schedule, the Huskies should go 10-2.
  • FreeChavezFreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223

    at Stanford
    at USC
    Oregon
    at ASU
    at Boise
    Arizona
    Utah
    Cal
    Utah St.
    at Oregon St
    WSU
    Sac St

    Even with sark at the helm the tree's have been the most beatable "elite" team on our schedule. Calling them the hardest doesn't hold much water. Oregon is #1 until we beat them maybe once in a decade. Boise is likely the 2nd hardest just based on the home field advantage, the starting of a new qb for uw, and the idea that BSU always plays well against these one big game a year opponents.
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    This is a subjective exercise, lets see how it turns out. One thing is for sure, UW is not going 10-2. Thats even more fucktarded than "the smart money was always on Boise."

    Stanford will be the toughest game simply because their D will hold UW to 3 or 6 points.

    Oregon the past two years was a totally different team with Mariotta hobbled or one or two OL injuries. That was even with great backs. No Mariotta, no 100% play at the most important position on the field. They also lose their 3 best OL. Maybe Johnstone will be okay but don't count on lineman often don't come back to form after major injuries. Its at home and its the 6th game of the season, coming off a bye.

    Boise could end up being tougher than ASU yes.

    Sark is a fucking douchebag but he will want to do well against UW and it could be a typical Sark game where he beats up on a worse team.
  • FreeChavezFreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223

    This is a subjective exercise, lets see how it turns out. One thing is for sure, UW is not going 10-2. Thats even more fucktarded than "the smart money was always on Boise."

    Sark is a fucking douchebag but he will want to do well against UW and it could be a typical Sark game where he beats up on a worse team.

    * Although, it's stillllll sark. He has the amazing ability to take a winnable game and shoot poo out his backside, all the way to an inexplicable loss.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    This is a subjective exercise, lets see how it turns out. One thing is for sure, UW is not going 10-2. Thats even more fucktarded than "the smart money was always on Boise."

    Stanford will be the toughest game simply because their D will hold UW to 3 or 6 points.

    Oregon the past two years was a totally different team with Mariotta hobbled or one or two OL injuries. That was even with great backs. No Mariotta, no 100% play at the most important position on the field. They also lose their 3 best OL. Maybe Johnstone will be okay but don't count on lineman often don't come back to form after major injuries. Its at home and its the 6th game of the season, coming off a bye.

    Boise could end up being tougher than ASU yes.

    Sark is a fucking douchebag but he will want to do well against UW and it could be a typical Sark game where he beats up on a worse team.

    When did Stanford fire Shaw?
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    This is a subjective exercise, lets see how it turns out. One thing is for sure, UW is not going 10-2. Thats even more fucktarded than "the smart money was always on Boise."

    Stanford will be the toughest game simply because their D will hold UW to 3 or 6 points.

    Oregon the past two years was a totally different team with Mariotta hobbled or one or two OL injuries. That was even with great backs. No Mariotta, no 100% play at the most important position on the field. They also lose their 3 best OL. Maybe Johnstone will be okay but don't count on lineman often don't come back to form after major injuries. Its at home and its the 6th game of the season, coming off a bye.

    Boise could end up being tougher than ASU yes.

    Sark is a fucking douchebag but he will want to do well against UW and it could be a typical Sark game where he beats up on a worse team.

    When did Stanford fire Shaw?
    You boof, Boobie. Get a new shtick. David Shaw is 42-12 with 3 BCS Bowl appearances in four seasons. Facts are facts, Boobie lips.
    Larry Coker thinks David Shaw sucks.
Sign In or Register to comment.