"Gay conversations" science paper was fabricated; retracted from Science journal

DerekJohnson

A widely-celebrated study that claimed people opposed to gay marriage could be almost instantly "converted" by sharing a conversation with a gay person turns out to have been utterly fabricated.

The university researchers just made it all up and got it published in the peer-reviewed journal Science.

This demonstrates not only how dishonest many of today's scientists are, but also how easily prestigious science journals can be tricked with BAD science:

naturalnews.com/049809_gay_science_retraction_propaganda_agenda.html

whatshouldicareabout

Did the article mention anything about gay threads on a football message board?

DerekJohnson

whatshouldicareabout said:

Did the article mention anything about gay threads on a football message board?

Stay tuned. <------ ($75k)

d2d

You need to send this to the UW "Q" Center. They have a section for publishing emails called "Dear Queer".


"Queering a World Class Education"

They are very inclusive, except for hating former military, conservative, religious, white, male, heterosexuals. (You of course know Coach James fit all those categories.)

They also sponsor the "Lavender" Graduation Ceremony.

link: UW Q Center.edu

OZONE

DerekJohnson said:

A widely-celebrated study that claimed people opposed to gay marriage could be almost instantly "converted" by sharing a conversation with a gay person turns out to have been utterly fabricated.

The university researchers just made it all up and got it published in the peer-reviewed journal Science.

This demonstrates not only how dishonest many of today's scientists are, but also how easily prestigious science journals can be tricked with BAD science:

Hi There. Actually, the Journal Science is what's known as a peer review journal, meaning that it encourages peers to review the scientific submission of others. When peers attempted to build on the study described in the article, some issues with the original data surfaced, which led to one of the co authors to seek a retraction of the article, until those data issues can be addressed. In other words, the peer review nature of the journal, worked as intended. The scientific community wasn't tricked, as you suggest. Perhaps your favorite media outlet was tricked, can't really say.

Please let us know, when any of the scientists you support, in the fields of creation science, or anti global warming science, as examples, submit their studies to peer review journals. Thank you.

d2d

OZONE said:

DerekJohnson said:

A widely-celebrated study that claimed people opposed to gay marriage could be almost instantly "converted" by sharing a conversation with a gay person turns out to have been utterly fabricated.

The university researchers just made it all up and got it published in the peer-reviewed journal Science.

This demonstrates not only how dishonest many of today's scientists are, but also how easily prestigious science journals can be tricked with BAD science:

Hi There. Actually, the Journal Science is what's known as a peer review journal, meaning that it encourages peers to review the scientific submission of others. When peers attempted to build on the study described in the article, some issues with the original data surfaced, which led to one of the co authors to seek a retraction of the article, until those data issues can be addressed. In other words, the peer review nature of the journal, worked as intended. The scientific community wasn't tricked, as you suggest. Perhaps your favorite media outlet was tricked, can't really say.

Please let us know, when any of the scientists you support, in the fields of creation science, or anti global warming science, as examples, submit their studies to peer review journals. Thank you.

Fucking fascinating. How's your supply of "The" OSU Anal Lube holding out? It now comes in flavors.

ThomasFremont

OZONE said:

DerekJohnson said:

A widely-celebrated study that claimed people opposed to gay marriage could be almost instantly "converted" by sharing a conversation with a gay person turns out to have been utterly fabricated.

The university researchers just made it all up and got it published in the peer-reviewed journal Science.

This demonstrates not only how dishonest many of today's scientists are, but also how easily prestigious science journals can be tricked with BAD science:

Hi There. Actually, the Journal Science is what's known as a peer review journal, meaning that it encourages peers to review the scientific submission of others. When peers attempted to build on the study described in the article, some issues with the original data surfaced, which led to one of the co authors to seek a retraction of the article, until those data issues can be addressed. In other words, the peer review nature of the journal, worked as intended. The scientific community wasn't tricked, as you suggest. Perhaps your favorite media outlet was tricked, can't really say.

Please let us know, when any of the scientists you support, in the fields of creation science, or anti global warming science, as examples, submit their studies to peer review journals. Thank you.

Sounds like a few people around here need a refresher on the scientific method.

CHRIST.

PurpleJ

Hardcore Husky: Your most trusted source of gay conversation science.

d2d

PurpleJ said:

Hardcore Husky: Your most trusted source of gay conversation science.

Like I said, so many faggots in here. Happy Harvey Milk Day, PJ.

OZONE

d2d said:

PurpleJ said:

Hardcore Husky: Your most trusted source of gay conversation science.

Like I said, so many faggots in here. Happy Harvey Milk Day, PJ.

It's interesting that some bigots conclude that only gay people, support gay rights. And these bigots like to use hate speech to support their bigot cause.

I've said it before d2d. You really should seek out professional mental help. As a pretend attorney, I'm guessing you can afford it? If not, maybe you can find a therapist that accepts pretend money.

d2d

OZONE said:

d2d said:

PurpleJ said:

Hardcore Husky: Your most trusted source of gay conversation science.

Like I said, so many faggots in here. Happy Harvey Milk Day, PJ.

It's interesting that some bigots conclude that only gay people, support gay rights. And these bigots like to use hate speech to support their bigot cause.

I've said it before d2d. You really should seek out professional mental help. As a pretend attorney, I'm guessing you can afford it? If not, maybe you can find one that accepts pretend money.

You sound like you're experienced. I'm sure you were helped immensely by the Scarlet & Gay Society.

link: The Ohio State University Scarlet and Gay Alumni Society

ThomasFremont

d2d said:

OZONE said:

d2d said:

PurpleJ said:

Hardcore Husky: Your most trusted source of gay conversation science.

Like I said, so many faggots in here. Happy Harvey Milk Day, PJ.

It's interesting that some bigots conclude that only gay people, support gay rights. And these bigots like to use hate speech to support their bigot cause.

I've said it before d2d. You really should seek out professional mental help. As a pretend attorney, I'm guessing you can afford it? If not, maybe you can find one that accepts pretend money.

You sound like you're experienced. I'm sure you were helped immensely by the Scarlet & Gay Society.

link: The Ohio State University Scarlet and Gay Alumni Society

It's time to step away from the keyboard, buddy.

I'm starting to feel sorry for you.

DerekJohnson

PurpleJ said:

Hardcore Husky: Your most trusted source of gay conversation science.

We've found our new slogan!!!11!!

d2d

Derek, it's a bit later for the poasers in this thread. They all headed to Neighbours.

ThomasFremont

d2d said:

Derek, it's a bit later for the poasers in this thread. They all headed to Neighbours.

Neighbors serves strong drinks.

d2d

ThomasFremont

d2d said:

Neighbors serves strong drinks.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

D2D is in 7th grade.

dnc

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

D2D is in 2nd grade.

d2d

DerekJohnson

You're venturing into Splooge territory now.