Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Wiz-Hawks

2»

Comments

  • NeedleInTheSky88NeedleInTheSky88 Member Posts: 96
    Hawks have to be one of the most overrated #1 seeds in NBA history. Hawks are at full strength and are struggling against the Wizards who have basically been playing without their all-star PG the entire series.

    As much as I don't like Cleveland, they should handle the Hawks rather easily.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Hawks have to be one of the most overrated #1 seeds in NBA history. Hawks are at full strength and are struggling against the Wizards who have basically been playing without their all-star PG the entire series.

    As much as I don't like Cleveland, they should handle the Hawks rather easily.

    image
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,998 Founders Club
    I want the Hawks so when my Cavs win I can tell RoadDawg55 I was right
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    I want the Hawks so when my Cavs win I can tell RoadDawg55 I was right

    I kind of jumped off the Hawks bandwagon in March. They still might make the Finals in the drecky East.

    Golden State has it in the bag.
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Nice pic Sven but.... the 94-95 Sonics were 6 W's ahead of everyone else in the NBA and also had an SRS of 8.68 which was way ahead of everyone else and even the #2 Knicks at 6.48.

    Atlanta had the best W/L and SRS in the East but had the 4th best SRS overall.

    Rather than the most overrated the 94-95 Sonics probably were the biggest choke...perhaps in NBA history.

    And stop being a dingleberry about SRS. It adjusts for point differential and SOS and is a pure measure at how good teams are. Its much more important to football given the much shorter schedule.

    Interestingly, there is a parallel to the Sonics in the 90s and Oregon football recently. Both registered extremely strong SRS ratings over more than a few seasons but could never win the ultimate prize.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Nice pic Sven but.... the 94-95 Sonics were 6 W's ahead of everyone else in the NBA and also had an SRS of 8.68 which was way ahead of everyone else and even the #2 Knicks at 6.48.

    Atlanta had the best W/L and SRS in the East but had the 4th best SRS overall.

    Rather than the most overrated the 94-95 Sonics probably were the biggest choke...perhaps in NBA history.

    And stop being a dingleberry about SRS. It adjusts for point differential and SOS and is a pure measure at how good teams are. Its much more important to football given the much shorter schedule.

    Interestingly, there is a parallel to the Sonics in the 90s and Oregon football recently. Both registered extremely strong SRS ratings over more than a few seasons but could never win the ultimate prize.

    I think you just proved my poont.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    My Hawks just get it done.
  • HuskyInAZHuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732

    Nice pic Sven but.... the 94-95 Sonics were 6 W's ahead of everyone else in the NBA and also had an SRS of 8.68 which was way ahead of everyone else and even the #2 Knicks at 6.48.

    Atlanta had the best W/L and SRS in the East but had the 4th best SRS overall.

    Rather than the most overrated the 94-95 Sonics probably were the biggest choke...perhaps in NBA history.

    And stop being a dingleberry about SRS. It adjusts for point differential and SOS and is a pure measure at how good teams are. Its much more important to football given the much shorter schedule.

    Interestingly, there is a parallel to the Sonics in the 90s and Oregon football recently. Both registered extremely strong SRS ratings over more than a few seasons but could never win the ultimate prize.

    You really are the "stats superiority guy". I thought is was all bullshit.
Sign In or Register to comment.