The present is known...it's the past (temperatures) that keep changing...

HoustonHusky

notrickszone.com/2015/05/02/151-degrees-of-fudging-energy-physicist-unveils-noaas-massive-rewrite-of-maine-climate-history/#sthash.hfRbwyGw.nQwqTvYI.dpbs



The Global Warming religion must be right, so if the data doesn't support it you just have to go change the data...

sarktastic

... but how does this prove bush was a bad president???

2001400ex

And you believe everything you read. As long as it's not from the "liberal media".

RaceBannon

Did you read the article or just the headline?

2001400ex

Did you read the article or just the headline?

RaceBannon

Someone doesn't fit in



















At all

2001400ex

"UPDATE: DUE TO ELEVATED INTEREST, THIS ARTICLE WILL BE A STICKY POST FOR ANOTHER DAY OR TWO."

Clearly a money grab. Derek?

HoustonHusky

Surely it's not a trend...it's not like they have been caught before.

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/noaanasa-dramatically-altered-us-temperatures-after-the-year-2000/

dailycaller.com/2014/06/30/noaa-quietly-reinstates-july-1936-as-the-hottest-month-on-record/

etc...etc...

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

Someone doesn't fit in



















At all

Close the fucking gates Derek.

2001400ex

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/nothing-false-about-temperature-data/

"Palmer’s claim that “we are building an entire agenda on falsified data” has no basis in evidence. Even as these claims of data manipulation have resurfaced, there is now a general consensus that 2014 was the hottest single year since temperature record keeping began. This same conclusion has been reached by NOAA and NASA, the Japan Meteorological Agency, and the World Meteorological Organization. The United Kingdom’s Met Office said that 2014 was among the warmest along with 2010, but it is impossible to say for sure that 2014 was hotter. According to NASA, nine of the 10 warmest years have all occurred since 2000, with 1998 the lone exception."

RaceBannon

since temperature record keeping began.


Oregon football since 1994 laughs at that statement

CuntWaffle

HoustonHusky said:

Surely it's not a trend...it's not like they have been caught before.

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/06/23/noaanasa-dramatically-altered-us-temperatures-after-the-year-2000/

dailycaller.com/2014/06/30/noaa-quietly-reinstates-july-1936-as-the-hottest-month-on-record/

etc...etc...

And you believe everything you read. As long as it's not from the "liberal media".

CuntWaffle

2001400ex said:

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/nothing-false-about-temperature-data/

"Palmer’s claim that “we are building an entire agenda on falsified data” has no basis in evidence. Even as these claims of data manipulation have resurfaced, there is now a general consensus that 2014 was the hottest single year since temperature record keeping began. This same conclusion has been reached by NOAA and NASA, the Japan Meteorological Agency, and the World Meteorological Organization. The United Kingdom’s Met Office said that 2014 was among the warmest along with 2010, but it is impossible to say for sure that 2014 was hotter. According to NASA, nine of the 10 warmest years have all occurred since 2000, with 1998 the lone exception."

Ask if someone believes everything they read, then posts a link.

Classic Honda.

topdawgnc

I wonder what the headlines were in the late 30's when America had it's hottest summers ever. And wind patterns were such all the top soil from the heartland were swept up and dropped on NYC. Not too mention the droughts.

God really hated America in the 30's and the early 40's.

We didn't get in his good graces again until we went and saved the Jews.

HoustonHusky

2001400ex said:

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/nothing-false-about-temperature-data/

"Palmer’s claim that “we are building an entire agenda on falsified data” has no basis in evidence. Even as these claims of data manipulation have resurfaced, there is now a general consensus that 2014 was the hottest single year since temperature record keeping began. This same conclusion has been reached by NOAA and NASA, the Japan Meteorological Agency, and the World Meteorological Organization. The United Kingdom’s Met Office said that 2014 was among the warmest along with 2010, but it is impossible to say for sure that 2014 was hotter. According to NASA, nine of the 10 warmest years have all occurred since 2000, with 1998 the lone exception."

There is a conclusion...there is just no legit data to back it up. Attacking people who quote NOAA/NASA directly over the years and pull/plot data directly from their website (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/) makes sense...after all, we need someone like Dan Rather interpreting data for us.

It is amusing that many of the datasets "concluding" it was the warmest on record have a record of only ~20 years of independent data, and statistically 2014 was no different than 2010, 2005, 2013, or 1998. But they say "warmest" so it has to count for something, right? And according to the satellite data there has been no global warming for 18 years and the hottest year was 1998, but that doesn't fit the narrative so we'll just ignore that.

And I especially like a factcheck article that "proves" a claim that historical data was manipulated between 2013 and 2015 false by citing papers written in 2012, 2010, 2010, 2011, and 2007 saying the data manipulation (already performed) was correct. Only morons like Hondo might not be bright enough to follow that timeline...

Lapdog.

(nothing to see here...move along now...)

2001400ex

sarktastic

not sure this was intentional but hondo's graph confirms the issue raised by OP

d2d

Did someone start a Global Warming thread and not evite me?

2001400ex

d2d said:

Did someone start a Global Warming thread and not evite me?

We all just assumed you'd shit post the thread within a day.

2001400ex

sarktastic said:

not sure this was intentional but hondo's graph confirms the issue raised by OP

I would say your reading comprehension sucks. But clearly you can't even read a picture.

d2d

2001400ex said:

sarktastic said:

not sure this was intentional but hondo's graph confirms the issue raised by OP

I would say your reading comprehension sucks. But clearly you can't even read a picture.

Plagiarize some new material, please.