Direct from the spin machine

Houhusky

Sark is now Gary Pinkel

I heard year 7 is going to be special

TierbsHsotBoobs

Gary Pinkel is lucky that Missouri is not a football school.

RaceBannon

Lambo, Pinkle, and Tormy - the holy trinity of doogdumb

HeretoBeatmyChest

If we are referring to Missouri Gary Pinkel then where is Sark's 27 years of coaching experience, 7 years of coordinating experience and 10 years of head coaching experience?

After his first two seasons, Pinkel was 38-27 in conference play for a school with no tradition and no advantage and in a conference that included Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Texas A&M and Colorado.

Sven, your fill of shit. Missouri has been very lucky to have Pinkel. The shame or joke is that UW hired Gilby & Lambo with Pinkel never getting a shot. Pinkel probably would have kept UW in the top 15 regularly. I don't think he's a top 10 coach and I wouldn't hire him now but I think he would have done quite well at UW over a long period. Comparing Sark to Pinkel is way beyond me. Someone pulled that one deep from their fartbox.

MikeDamone

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

If we are referring to Missouri Gary Pinkel then where is Sark's 27 years of coaching experience, 7 years of coordinating experience and 10 years of head coaching experience?

After his first two seasons, Pinkel was 38-27 in conference play for a school with no tradition and no advantage and in a conference that included Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Texas A&M and Colorado.

Sven, your fill of shit. Missouri has been very lucky to have Pinkel. The shame or joke is that UW hired Gilby & Lambo with Pinkel never getting a shot. Pinkel probably would have kept UW in the top 15 regularly. I don't think he's a top 10 coach but I think he would have done quite well at UW over a long period. Comparing Sark to Pinkel is way beyond me. Someone pulled that one deep from their fartbox.

Pinkel had had a CONTRACT!!!!

vadawg

Never hire an offensively minded coach....never. Look at the statistics.

RoadDawg55

vadawg said:

Never hire an offensively minded coach....never. Look at the statistics.

Harbaugh, Chip, Urban Meyer, Chris Petersen... Curious why you would say that?

Homebrew_Dawg

vadawg said:

Never hire an offensively minded coach....never. Look at the statistics.

Certainly not one that can't coach. Part of Sark's trouble is his skills positions' myopia. We need real talent on the lines. Going to be interesting seeing how well the OL plays this season.

Mad_Son

Based on the coaching effect statistics stuff Pinkel is one of the top 20 coaches over the past several year. Regardless of how good he is in an absolute sense, he does more with less - unlike Sark who does less with more.

HeretoBeatmyChest

RoadDawg55 said:

vadawg said:

Never hire an offensively minded coach....never. Look at the statistics.

Harbaugh, Chip, Urban Meyer, Chris Petersen... Curious why you would say that?

Throw in Don James too who was a former QB who became a defensive minded coach.

But to VaDawg's point, I think after the last four coaches we've had, its time to bring on a defensive minded HC.

AZDuck

I was just talking to a Mizzou fan today who thinks that: (1) Mizzou is going win ten games this year, and (2) Washington will be much improved and will push Oregon and maybe even beat us.

/dismissivewankingmotion

HeretoBeatmyChest

AZDuck said:

I was just talking to a Mizzou fan today who thinks that: (1) Mizzou is going win ten games this year, and (2) Washington will be much improved and will push Oregon and maybe even beat us.

/dismissivewankingmotion

Sounds like Fleenor.

greenearplugs

i'll get roasted here, but there is evidence that pinkel is one of the better coaches in the country

TierbsHsotBoobs

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

If we are referring to Missouri Gary Pinkel then where is Sark's 27 years of coaching experience, 7 years of coordinating experience and 10 years of head coaching experience?

After his first two seasons, Pinkel was 38-27 in conference play for a school with no tradition and no advantage and in a conference that included Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Texas A&M and Colorado.

Sven, your fill of shit. Missouri has been very lucky to have Pinkel. The shame or joke is that UW hired Gilby & Lambo with Pinkel never getting a shot. Pinkel probably would have kept UW in the top 15 regularly. I don't think he's a top 10 coach and I wouldn't hire him now but I think he would have done quite well at UW over a long period. Comparing Sark to Pinkel is way beyond me. Someone pulled that one deep from their fartbox.

Pinkel's first six years at Missouri:
2001 Missouri 4–7 3–5 T–4th (North)
2002 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (North)
2003 Missouri 8–5 4–4 3rd (North) L Independence
2004 Missouri 5–6 3–5 T–3rd (North)
2005 Missouri 7–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) W Independence
2006 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North)

Name one REAL football school in America that would have kept him after year 4, much less year 6.

He's done some nice things there, but he is only 49-48 career at Missouri in conference play. Sark's conference record is better than that.

[Deleted User]

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

If we are referring to Missouri Gary Pinkel then where is Sark's 27 years of coaching experience, 7 years of coordinating experience and 10 years of head coaching experience?

After his first two seasons, Pinkel was 38-27 in conference play for a school with no tradition and no advantage and in a conference that included Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Texas A&M and Colorado.

Sven, your fill of shit. Missouri has been very lucky to have Pinkel. The shame or joke is that UW hired Gilby & Lambo with Pinkel never getting a shot. Pinkel probably would have kept UW in the top 15 regularly. I don't think he's a top 10 coach and I wouldn't hire him now but I think he would have done quite well at UW over a long period. Comparing Sark to Pinkel is way beyond me. Someone pulled that one deep from their fartbox.

Pinkel's first six years at Missouri:
2001 Missouri 4–7 3–5 T–4th (North)
2002 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (North)
2003 Missouri 8–5 4–4 3rd (North) L Independence
2004 Missouri 5–6 3–5 T–3rd (North)
2005 Missouri 7–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) W Independence
2006 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North)

Name one REAL football school in America that would have kept him after year 4, much less year 6.

He's done some nice things there, but he is only 49-48 career at Missouri in conference play. Sark's conference record is better than that.

Yet despite being so average unlike Sark still managed to win more than 7 games a few times in his career.

Sark is a worse version of stellar coaches like Pinkel, Gailey, Neuheisel, and Tedford.

McRib

Pinkel in the 2 hole for a big surprise in 2013???

[Deleted User]

Is it Fleenor who is the big fan of Gary Pinkell?

TheKobeStopper

greenearplugs said:

i'll get roasted here, but there is evidence that pinkel is one of the better coaches in the country

Is it the 0 conference championships in 12 years at Missouri?

Or perhaps it's the two Big 12 championship game appearences that he lost by a combined 62 points?

DugtheDoog

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Is it Fleenor who is the big fan of Gary Pinkell?

I'm not sure about that, but they did share some pops at Butler Cabin quite a few times.

IrishDawg22

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

RoadDawg55 said:

vadawg said:

Never hire an offensively minded coach....never. Look at the statistics.

Harbaugh, Chip, Urban Meyer, Chris Petersen... Curious why you would say that?

Throw in Don James too who was a former QB who became a defensive minded coach.

But to VaDawg's point, I think after the last four coaches we've had, its time to bring on a defensive minded HC.

Agree.

If he continues his upward trend a hot name is going to be Bob Diaco.

Just don't listen to his dating advice.

TierbsHsotBoobs

He_Needs_More_Time said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

If we are referring to Missouri Gary Pinkel then where is Sark's 27 years of coaching experience, 7 years of coordinating experience and 10 years of head coaching experience?

After his first two seasons, Pinkel was 38-27 in conference play for a school with no tradition and no advantage and in a conference that included Texas, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Texas A&M and Colorado.

Sven, your fill of shit. Missouri has been very lucky to have Pinkel. The shame or joke is that UW hired Gilby & Lambo with Pinkel never getting a shot. Pinkel probably would have kept UW in the top 15 regularly. I don't think he's a top 10 coach and I wouldn't hire him now but I think he would have done quite well at UW over a long period. Comparing Sark to Pinkel is way beyond me. Someone pulled that one deep from their fartbox.

Pinkel's first six years at Missouri:
2001 Missouri 4–7 3–5 T–4th (North)
2002 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (North)
2003 Missouri 8–5 4–4 3rd (North) L Independence
2004 Missouri 5–6 3–5 T–3rd (North)
2005 Missouri 7–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) W Independence
2006 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North)

Name one REAL football school in America that would have kept him after year 4, much less year 6.

He's done some nice things there, but he is only 49-48 career at Missouri in conference play. Sark's conference record is better than that.

Yet despite being so average unlike Sark still managed to win more than 7 games a few times in his career.

Sark is a worse version of stellar coaches like Pinkel, Gailey, Neuheisel, and Tedford.

Win a BCS bowl and you don't deserve to be in that list.