Here is football talk you whiners
Sankey
Callier
Cooper
Washington
I have to say, this looks pretty solid. If anyone has had opportunity to see Cooper run, know this guy is no joke.
Thoughts from the X & O guys.....what do you think?
Comments
-
Will they have anyone to block for them?jecornel said:It looks like Callier and Cooper will be given the green light to play against BSU.
Sankey
Callier
Cooper
Washington
I have to say, this looks pretty solid. If anyone has had opportunity to see Cooper run, know this guy is no joke.
Thoughts from the X & O guys.....what do you think? -
Who are we playing?
-
I am hearing triple reverse and two torn ACLs to start off the season.jecornel said:It looks like Callier and Cooper will be given the green light to play against BSU.
Sankey
Callier
Cooper
Washington
I have to say, this looks pretty solid. If anyone has had opportunity to see Cooper run, know this guy is no joke.
Thoughts from the X & O guys.....what do you think? -
Oregon or Stanford would like this group, Sark wants more wideouts.jecornel said:It looks like Callier and Cooper will be given the green light to play against BSU.
Sankey
Callier
Cooper
Washington
I have to say, this looks pretty solid. If anyone has had opportunity to see Cooper run, know this guy is no joke.
Thoughts from the X & O guys.....what do you think?
-
How can Sark declare that both are playing when the game is still 11 days away? Plenty of time to get injured.
-
We will gain rushing yards and beat Boise. The middle of the season will be a big problem for this team.
-
Cooper is the most hyped player to never play I have ever heard about
The guy should never suit up to protect his hall of fame legacy at UW. -
I penned this gem after the 2011 season.. I'm guessing this year plays put similar. I could be wrong. It's just what I'm hearing. Not what I really think.DerekJohnson said:We will gain rushing yards and beat Boise. The middle of the season will be a big problem for this team.
"The writing was on the wall at 5-1. Giving up 450 yards per game against a schedule made up of the weakest teams we would face during the year. A 3 point win over a Fcs team. Glaring weakness at every defensive position. Yet Doogs shouted down all those that would present the facts. Doogs said Nebraska really didnt blow us out. Real dawgs are just happy with 5-1 and can't you just be happy with a win? Your a coog/duck troll, not a real fan and hate the Huskies. We will be 8-4 (assumed) and 9-4 (assumed) with a bowl win. Then what will you HHBs say then?!!!
TeqFS and his fucking manifesto rationalizing why the defense was actually good makes me sick. Ts and Ps to his fucking brain.
Horatia had a decent run, but in the end, the venom from the suckers who refuse to see the truth led to too many complaints and king Doog Kim brought the ban hammer. There was a spirited run of a new handle each week, but now I am too tired and disinterested to post there. After reading the posts there today it looks like those that shouted us down are now saying what we have been saying all year. Of course, they think their ideas are new and original. Well, I hope now some things will change, but I doubt it. Especially after reading Woodward praise of the progress from going 7-6 with a bowl win to 7-6 with a Fcs close win, a bowl loss, and the worst defensive game in Uw history and maybe the worst defensive season in Uw history. Awesome progress.
Fuck those that hate husky football to the point they can't tell the truth about it. I don't have the energy to list of the dumbfucks over there, but we all know who they are. Kim is the most disingenuous of them all" -
-
I remember at 5-1 Doogs gloating how all the Sark haters were wrong while ignoring the easy schedule, how UW was lucky in almost every win against not so good opponents, and anyone with half a brain knew that season was fools gold.
The Huskies as we all know ended up 7-6 and those Doogs had now turned their focus on hating Holt, praising the Wilcox hire and jacking off to the Tosh hire.





