USC vs UCLA football recruiting: the battle for LA

KoolAidMan

If UCLA has a kicker that doesn't go braindead, they win the conference Mora's first year and 11 games last year.

MisterEm

^^ "If" games are cute.

AZDuck

If you fuckheads are going to bash half-assed research performed by looking at bowl game results from 2014 on my phone then I AM OUT!*
























*not really, I'll never be "out"

Swaye

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

BallSacked said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Until one of those two schools hires a coach that can develop the talent and manage games, they will both continue to underachieve.

UCLA has developed individual player talent very well under Mora. The weakness of the program is largely schematic and game management. I know the jealously is real with other P12 fans of the LA schools, but I think there is still upside for Mora at UCLA. More talent more depth and the program has the OL pipeline finally rolling after three years of predominantly first and second year starters on the OL.

SC is a just an average coach away from a juggernaut.

If Peterson manages a 10-3 year in either of the next two years, we know 81% of this board will be lining up to give him HJs, and won't call it underacheiving. Bias much?

We've had one ten win season since Poison was a cool band. I really hate to admit it and was on denial for a long time, but Warshington isn't really relevant and hasn't been for a long time. 10 wins is a start.

Poison was never a cool band.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

sarktastic said:

AZDuck said:

13 teams won 10 games or more in 2014. That means that 10 wins = top 10%

So, put another way...107/120 teams didn't?

Not the case.

AZDuck can't count. There were 23 FBS schools that won 10 games:
http://espn.go.com/college-football/standings

He's a lawyer, not a mathmagician.