If it had been about Romar or Sark he would have shitcanned the post and banned the poster.
You guys know better.
U really r an idiot.
Takes one to know one.
At least u admit ur an idiot. Just regurgitating Race Bannon's HH talking points. Try to have an independent thought. Why would he hate Petersen ?seriously?! He's critical and rightly so. Kim spoke up a year ago about Petersen's recruiting efforts. Kim was frustrated over Petersen settling for lower level guys and not competing in California. It's clear so far Petersen is taking a different approach this year.
Kim called him out about game management, there were no personal attacks. Anyone with a pulse knows Petersen cost u guys the Arizona game.
And finally he was critical about ur final record, The team under performed so who should get the blame? The only personal attacks going on is the scorched earth policy this board follows against anyone critical of Petersen.
Beezlekim, you're ur really a stupid fuck.
You hate Petersen because he doesn't like you or others like you who hang around and onto the program expecting them to coddle and feed your desire to advance yourself as an insider.
The attacks on his recruiting in his first year were completely unwarranted and unjustifiable and showed right away that you were holding Petersen to a completely different standard than the previous crew of buffoons. Sark's first class was an epic failure that was defended because, well, it just shouldn't count because it shouldn't. Petersen's was a solid class by any measure, full of balance and stars, that was panned for not having enough...well, what was it lacking exactly?
Kim Beezlekim has called him out at every opportunity, showing a zeal for critiquing the coach. He has a zeal for it that far exceeds what he was willing to tolerate from posters when it came to the previous staff. It's really, really simple and obvious. You lost this one before it started because everyone here and even the dumb asses still paying on DM.c know it. You're just too fucking stupid to accept it and find a new argument.
I'm old enough to remember when Kim's bored had so much traffic he didn't have time to post on a competitor's board... under an alias... posing as a retard.
Are people in this thread really engaging and arguing with @beelzebub?
A psych grad student could write a dissertation about the way Beez has become a Kim proxy for posters struggling to come to terms with how Doogman treated them.
I'm old enough to remember when Kim's bored had so much traffic he didn't have time to post on a competitor's board... under an alias... posing as a retardhimself.
Peterman's first recruiting class at UW is total dog shit... unless and until one by one those players develop into something. Same as it is with all coaches.
The differences between Sark's and Peterman's first class are:
1. We know Sarks first class was a dismal failure/ Peterman's, the jury is still out.
2. We know Peterman hit the ground running, the day he took the job simply adjusting his recruiting program./ Sark had no recruiting program and seemingly threw the first class intentionally, to provide himself a cover story for slow progress... which the doogs swallowed enthusiastically.
Peterman's first recruiting class at UW is total dog shit... unless and until one by one those players develop into something. Same as it is with all coaches.
The differences between Sark's and Peterman's first class are:
1. We know Sarks first class was a dismal failure/ Peterman's, the jury is still out.
2. We know Peterman hit the ground running, the day he took the job simply adjusting his recruiting program./ Sark had no recruiting program and seemingly threw the first class intentionally, to provide himself a cover story for slow progress... which the doogs swallowed enthusiastically.
How the fuck can you call his first recruiting class dog shit right now? We've only seen 8 of them play (Pettis, Lenius, Dissly, Gardenhire, Hale, Jones, Baker, Vizcaino) because the other 15 players were redshirting. Additionally, that's 92 total player-years of football for this recruiting class and we've only seen 8 player-years, so effectively only 8.7% of this entire recruiting class.
And even though we've only seen <10% of this recruiting class, I'd say Sidney Jones is already something, being the best CB on the team, and Budda Baker is our best safety, too.
It's way too early to say anything about Petersen's first recruiting class.
Peterman's first recruiting class at UW is total dog shit... unless and until one by one those players develop into something. Same as it is with all coaches.
The differences between Sark's and Peterman's first class are:
1. We know Sarks first class was a dismal failure/ Peterman's, the jury is still out.
2. We know Peterman hit the ground running, the day he took the job simply adjusting his recruiting program./ Sark had no recruiting program and seemingly threw the first class intentionally, to provide himself a cover story for slow progress... which the doogs swallowed enthusiastically.
Peterman's first recruiting class at UW is total dog shit... unless and until one by one those players develop into something. Same as it is with all coaches.
The differences between Sark's and Peterman's first class are:
1. We know Sarks first class was a dismal failure/ Peterman's, the jury is still out.
2. We know Peterman hit the ground running, the day he took the job simply adjusting his recruiting program./ Sark had no recruiting program and seemingly threw the first class intentionally, to provide himself a cover story for slow progress... which the doogs swallowed enthusiastically.
How the fuck can you call his first recruiting class dog shit right now? We've only seen 8 of them play (Pettis, Lenius, Dissly, Gardenhire, Hale, Jones, Baker, Vizcaino) because the other 15 players were redshirting. Additionally, that's 92 total player-years of football for this recruiting class and we've only seen 8 player-years, so effectively only 8.7% of this entire recruiting class.
And even though we've only seen <10% of this recruiting class, I'd say Sidney Jones is already something, being the best CB on the team, and Budda Baker is our best safety, too.
It's way too early to say anything about Petersen's first recruiting class.</p>
When (if)this class takes the field, we'll know. Until then it's nothing but Kim's stars and TBS watchers ogling over lists of names.
I'm not saying this class doesn't have the chance to be great. Don't twist.
Peterman's first recruiting class at UW is total dog shit... unless and until one by one those players develop into something. Same as it is with all coaches.
The differences between Sark's and Peterman's first class are:
1. We know Sarks first class was a dismal failure/ Peterman's, the jury is still out.
2. We know Peterman hit the ground running, the day he took the job simply adjusting his recruiting program./ Sark had no recruiting program and seemingly threw the first class intentionally, to provide himself a cover story for slow progress... which the doogs swallowed enthusiastically.
Nonsense. It included a healthy number of linemen, had positional balance, included high rated guys who weren't coming to UW prior to the coaching change, and has guys who were already solid contributors. I don't disagree with your general sentiment about waiting and seeing, but your delivery is way over the top. There's plenty there to see to call his first class a very solid effort.
Are people in this thread really engaging and arguing with @beelzebub?
A psych grad student comm undergrad with a minor in women's studies could write a dissertation about the way Beez has become a Kim proxy for posters struggling to come to terms with how Doogman treated them.
Comments
you'reur really a stupid fuck.You hate Petersen because he doesn't like you or others like you who hang around and onto the program expecting them to coddle and feed your desire to advance yourself as an insider.
The attacks on his recruiting in his first year were completely unwarranted and unjustifiable and showed right away that you were holding Petersen to a completely different standard than the previous crew of buffoons. Sark's first class was an epic failure that was defended because, well, it just shouldn't count because it shouldn't. Petersen's was a solid class by any measure, full of balance and stars, that was panned for not having enough...well, what was it lacking exactly?
KimBeezlekim has called him out at every opportunity, showing a zeal for critiquing the coach. He has a zeal for it that far exceeds what he was willing to tolerate from posters when it came to the previous staff. It's really, really simple and obvious. You lost this one before it started because everyone here and even the dumb asses still paying on DM.c know it. You're just too fucking stupid to accept it and find a new argument.The differences between Sark's and Peterman's first class are:
1. We know Sarks first class was a dismal failure/ Peterman's, the jury is still out.
2. We know Peterman hit the ground running, the day he took the job simply adjusting his recruiting program./ Sark had no recruiting program and seemingly threw the first class intentionally, to provide himself a cover story for slow progress... which the doogs swallowed enthusiastically.
And even though we've only seen <10% of this recruiting class, I'd say Sidney Jones is already something, being the best CB on the team, and Budda Baker is our best safety, too.
It's way too early to say anything about Petersen's first recruiting class.
I'm not saying this class doesn't have the chance to be great. Don't twist.
lol