Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Jacob Eason

1567911

Comments

  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    Gladstone said:

    I'd take subpar WR and passing QB recruiting for a team that lines up and runs the fucking ball down your goddamned throat night in night out. The last time I really enjoyed UW offense was going option with Tui in 2000.

    I miss Warshington, damnit.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    MisterEm said:

    Gladstone said:

    I'd take subpar WR and passing QB recruiting for a team that lines up and runs the fucking ball down your goddamned throat night in night out. The last time I really enjoyed UW offense was going option with Tui in 2000.

    I miss Warshington, damnit.
    That team ran the option like 10-20% of plays. It's not like we went full on option.
    Which is why PJ & Locker would have been awesome.
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,705 Founders Club
    Gladstone said:

    I'd take subpar WR and passing QB recruiting for a team that lines up and runs the fucking ball down your goddamned throat night in night out. The last time I really enjoyed UW offense was going option with Tui in 2000.

    whats wrong with pat reddick catching a 9yd hook from cody pickett on 3rd down after a 1st down incomplete and 2nd down rush for 1yd?
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    edited July 2015
    Gladstone said:

    I'd take subpar WR and passing QB recruiting for a team that lines up and runs the fucking ball down your goddamned throat night in night out. The last time I really enjoyed UW offense was going option with Tui in 2000.

    Yeah how would that have worked without one of best QBs in league history? Probably 6-6 or 7-5.

    Subpar QB play in the pac12 isn't a recipe for sustained success. It barely passes in the ACC most years for GT.

    Power run game is one thing (like Stanford) - I'm all for that, wishbone is another. That wouldn't consistently work in the Pac12 in my opinion.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    MisterEm said:

    Gladstone said:

    I'd take subpar WR and passing QB recruiting for a team that lines up and runs the fucking ball down your goddamned throat night in night out. The last time I really enjoyed UW offense was going option with Tui in 2000.

    I miss Warshington, damnit.
    That team ran the option like 10-20% of plays. It's not like we went full on option.
    Which is why PJ & Locker would have been awesome.
    The thought of Jack Lockner making multiple split second decisions in a true triple option offense in CFB gives me nightmares.
    Because those are so fast is why I think Jake would have been just fine in that offense. Coaching and training for under-center, triple option is repetition to the point that it's instinctual. There's no time to think.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646

    MisterEm said:

    Gladstone said:

    I'd take subpar WR and passing QB recruiting for a team that lines up and runs the fucking ball down your goddamned throat night in night out. The last time I really enjoyed UW offense was going option with Tui in 2000.

    I miss Warshington, damnit.
    That team ran the option like 10-20% of plays. It's not like we went full on option.
    Which is why PJ & Locker would have been awesome.
    The thought of Jack Lockner making multiple split second decisions in a true triple option offense in CFB gives me nightmares.
    Because those are so fast is why I think Jake would have been just fine in that offense. Coaching and training for under-center, triple option is repetition to the point that it's instinctual. There's no time to think.
    I want to give you a half vote up and down for that comment. I get your point, but I still disagree.... DJ needs to get on that.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    MisterEm said:

    Gladstone said:

    I'd take subpar WR and passing QB recruiting for a team that lines up and runs the fucking ball down your goddamned throat night in night out. The last time I really enjoyed UW offense was going option with Tui in 2000.

    I miss Warshington, damnit.
    That team ran the option like 10-20% of plays. It's not like we went full on option.
    Which is why PJ & Locker would have been awesome.
    The thought of Jack Lockner making multiple split second decisions in a true triple option offense in CFB gives me nightmares.
    Because those are so fast is why I think Jake would have been just fine in that offense. Coaching and training for under-center, triple option is repetition to the point that it's instinctual. There's no time to think.
    I want to give you a half vote up and down for that comment. I get your point, but I still disagree.... DJ needs to get on that.
    Messican standoff
    image
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter

    I'm guessing Eason will enroll in January.

    Seriously, he's not interested in UW and hasn't been for a long time now. We have no shot.

    WDWHA
    Back on point,


    Who wants a #6 QB in the country?