They are always going to be the most talked about. Get in third, out develop them, win on saturday.
Not to mention that they can only take 25 just like anybody else ...
Be in the Top 3 for the Top 3 at a position grouping and you're going to recruit at comparable levels ... add to that the fact that those kids coming to Washington will most likely have a bit of a chip on their shoulders ... that's a big part of the recipe for success.
In the book The Thursday Speeches a bunch of emphasis on the idea that the LA schools didn't want the kids and they were merely "leftovers" was pounded into the team by Don James.
I don't know if it's tv exposure, scholarship reductions, or XBOX, but the concept of pride in beating the LA schools to send a message seems to be missing.
I would like to see that aggression and determination on the husky sideline again.
They are always going to be the most talked about. Get in third, out develop them, win on saturday.
Not to mention that they can only take 25 just like anybody else ...
Be in the Top 3 for the Top 3 at a position grouping and you're going to recruit at comparable levels ... add to that the fact that those kids coming to Washington will most likely have a bit of a chip on their shoulders ... that's a big part of the recipe for success.
In the book The Thursday Speeches a bunch of emphasis on the idea that the LA schools didn't want the kids and they were merely "leftovers" was pounded into the team by Don James.
I don't know if it's tv exposure, scholarship reductions, or XBOX, but the concept of pride in beating the LA schools to send a message seems to be missing.
I would like to see that aggression and determination on the husky sideline again.
They are always going to be the most talked about. Get in third, out develop them, win on saturday.
Not to mention that they can only take 25 just like anybody else ...
Be in the Top 3 for the Top 3 at a position grouping and you're going to recruit at comparable levels ... add to that the fact that those kids coming to Washington will most likely have a bit of a chip on their shoulders ... that's a big part of the recipe for success.
In the book The Thursday Speeches a bunch of emphasis on the idea that the LA schools didn't want the kids and they were merely "leftovers" was pounded into the team by Don James.
I don't know if it's tv exposure, scholarship reductions, or XBOX, but the concept of pride in beating the LA schools to send a message seems to be missing.
I would like to see that aggression and determination on the husky sideline again.
Now that Jack Lockner's retired, we get him to start roaming the sidelines. That'll help.
Eklund actually had a pretty damn good explanation for this that flies in the face ofKim's recent idiocy. He said Petersen's consistency in his approach to recruiting resonates well with kids. He sells the program and being part of the program and only looking for athletes that make the OKG grade. Eklund said kids like this more than Sark's approach, which was to sell something specific to each recruit (early playing time, getting your girlfriend into the school, bring your friend along as a walk on) instead of the program as a whole.
I fully expect Eklund to get a time out for posting this nonsense and a warning that next time he will be just gone.
Eklund actually had a pretty damn good explanation for this that flies in the face ofKim's recent idiocy. He said Petersen's consistency in his approach to recruiting resonates well with kids. He sells the program and being part of the program and only looking for athletes that make the OKG grade. Eklund said kids like this more than Sark's approach, which was to sell something specific to each recruit (early playing time, getting your girlfriend into the school, bring your friend along as a walk on) instead of the program as a whole.
I fully expect Eklund to get a time out for posting this nonsense and a warning that next time he will be just gone.
Eklund actually had a pretty damn good explanation for this that flies in the face ofKim's recent idiocy. He said Petersen's consistency in his approach to recruiting resonates well with kids. He sells the program and being part of the program and only looking for athletes that make the OKG grade. Eklund said kids like this more than Sark's approach, which was to sell something specific to each recruit (early playing time, getting your girlfriend into the school, bring your friend along as a walk on) instead of the program as a whole.
I fully expect Eklund to get a time out for posting this nonsense and a warning that next time he will be just gone.
I have to play devil's advocate and say who gives a shit. Great, recruits are talking up UW. Now get them to sign. FREE PUB and coming in 2nd and 3rd doesn't do anything.
Agreed. It's part of it, but not the end result. Gas in the car doesn't guarantee it will start.
I have to play devil's advocate and say who gives a shit. Great, recruits are talking up UW. Now get them to sign. FREE PUB and coming in 2nd and 3rd doesn't do anything.
Agreed. It's part of it, but not the end result. Gas in the car doesn't guarantee it will start.
They are always going to be the most talked about. Get in third, out develop them, win on saturday.
Not to mention that they can only take 25 just like anybody else ...
Be in the Top 3 for the Top 3 at a position grouping and you're going to recruit at comparable levels ... add to that the fact that those kids coming to Washington will most likely have a bit of a chip on their shoulders ... that's a big part of the recipe for success.
In the book The Thursday Speeches a bunch of emphasis on the idea that the LA schools didn't want the kids and they were merely "leftovers" was pounded into the team by Don James.
I don't know if it's tv exposure, scholarship reductions, or XBOX, but the concept of pride in beating the LA schools to send a message seems to be missing.
I would like to see that aggression and determination on the husky sideline again.
Awfully warm for February 5 and 7 record will get u another middling class
5-7 record will get Leach extended. Hi.
Leach got Cougs to bowl game in year two, not looking good for Petersen.
Shit yourself in the New Mexico Bowl, nothing else matters
Sort of like that shit u took against Oklahoma State in ur bowl game
Name one poster here who has even bragged about getting to that bowel game, or pointed to it as a sign of success? You can't... Yet you and your coog brethren continue to point to that epic New Mexico Bowel game as the proof that Leach is the greatest.
Eklund actually had a pretty damn good explanation for this that flies in the face ofKim's recent idiocy. He said Petersen's consistency in his approach to recruiting resonates well with kids. He sells the program and being part of the program and only looking for athletes that make the OKG grade. Eklund said kids like this more than Sark's approach, which was to sell something specific to each recruit (early playing time, getting your girlfriend into the school, bring your friend along as a walk on) instead of the program as a whole.
I fully expect Eklund to get a time out for posting this nonsense and a warning that next time he will be just gone.
Eklund actually had a pretty damn good explanation for this that flies in the face ofKim's recent idiocy. He said Petersen's consistency in his approach to recruiting resonates well with kids. He sells the program and being part of the program and only looking for athletes that make the OKG grade. Eklund said kids like this more than Sark's approach, which was to sell something specific to each recruit (early playing time, getting your girlfriend into the school, bring your friend along as a walk on) instead of the program as a whole.
I fully expect Eklund to get a time out for posting this nonsense and a warning that next time he will be just gone.
Eklund actually had a pretty damn good explanation for this that flies in the face ofKim's recent idiocy. He said Petersen's consistency in his approach to recruiting resonates well with kids. He sells the program and being part of the program and only looking for athletes that make the OKG grade. Eklund said kids like this more than Sark's approach, which was to sell something specific to each recruit (early playing time, getting your girlfriend into the school, bring your friend along as a walk on) instead of the program as a whole.
I fully expect Eklund to get a time out for posting this nonsense and a warning that next time he will be just gone.
I have to play devil's advocate and say who gives a shit. Great, recruits are talking up UW. Now get them to sign. FREE PUB and coming in 2nd and 3rd doesn't do anything.
Agreed. It's part of it, but not the end result. Gas in the car doesn't guarantee it will start.
I have to play devil's advocate and say who gives a shit. Great, recruits are talking up UW. Now get them to sign. FREE PUB and coming in 2nd and 3rd doesn't do anything.
Agreed. It's part of it, but not the end result. Gas in the car doesn't guarantee it will start.
They are always going to be the most talked about. Get in third, out develop them, win on saturday.
Not to mention that they can only take 25 just like anybody else ...
Be in the Top 3 for the Top 3 at a position grouping and you're going to recruit at comparable levels ... add to that the fact that those kids coming to Washington will most likely have a bit of a chip on their shoulders ... that's a big part of the recipe for success.
In the book The Thursday Speeches a bunch of emphasis on the idea that the LA schools didn't want the kids and they were merely "leftovers" was pounded into the team by Don James.
I don't know if it's tv exposure, scholarship reductions, or XBOX, but the concept of pride in beating the LA schools to send a message seems to be missing.
I would like to see that aggression and determination on the husky sideline again.
Awfully warm for February 5 and 7 record will get u another middling class
5-7 record will get Leach extended. Hi.
Leach got Cougs to bowl game in year two, not looking good for Petersen.
Shit yourself in the New Mexico Bowl, nothing else matters
Sort of like that shit u took against Oklahoma State in ur bowl game
Name one poster here who has even bragged about getting to that bowel game, or pointed to it as a sign of success? You can't... Yet you and your coog brethren continue to point to that epic New Mexico Bowel game as the proof that Leach is the greatest.
U miss the point Leach getting Cougs to a bowl game 2 years after Wulff debacle was a miracle. Not many coaches were worse that ur hero Ty Willie. Wulff was one of them.
Comments
I don't know if it's tv exposure, scholarship reductions, or XBOX, but the concept of pride in beating the LA schools to send a message seems to be missing.
I would like to see that aggression and determination on the husky sideline again.
You should PM @Tailgater... I hear he's got the Sodbusting down.
Just the same