If we're being honest, the speech was a let down, will have very little lasting effect. Much more important is what happens next. Nogaf about some speech if there isn't concrete action coming out of it.
If we're being honest, the speech was a let down, will have very little lasting effect. Much more important is what happens next. Nogaf about some speech if there isn't concrete action coming out of it.
You don't read well. I'm just arguing that your preconceived notions are wrong.
FYI, true story. I walked through a Muslim temple (coincidentally with a UW T-shirt on) about 100 miles from Pakistan, in India, and nothing happened to me. It was disgusting and they made us take off our flip flops and walk barefoot. Granted India is peaceful. When I told my father in law, an old school conservative, that I took his daughter through a Muslim temple, he about flipped out.
Like I said, there are Muslims that want to kill us. That I'm not disputing. And some of them even use the Quran as their motivation.
That's not what you said. You asked for a quote from the Koran that advocated violence.
No shit most muslims are peaceful, water is wet.
Now you say the Koran inspires them, but here on the same thread, same page, you are shown to be back pedaling from your original statement.
Fact is, there are Muslims who want to kill Christians in the name of Allah. But they aren't following the Quran in those quests.
I'm not running around scared of all brown people that pray to the east. There is a significant portion of them that use their holy book to justify crimes against humanity. I'm not going to apologize on behalf of the muslims that don't in order to not hurt their feelings.
It's their religion, their reputation. Let their peaceful leaders stand on a podium and renounce these hateful texts. May they provide context for the muslims lacking context to better guide them in their path for salvation. May their actions back up their words.
I strongly recommend that Hondo save these Koran arguments for the guy who's beheading his wife.
You don't read well. I'm just arguing that your preconceived notions are wrong.
FYI, true story. I walked through a Muslim temple (coincidentally with a UW T-shirt on) about 100 miles from Pakistan, in India, and nothing happened to me. It was disgusting and they made us take off our flip flops and walk barefoot. Granted India is peaceful. When I told my father in law, an old school conservative, that I took his daughter through a Muslim temple, he about flipped out.
Like I said, there are Muslims that want to kill us. That I'm not disputing. And some of them even use the Quran as their motivation.
That's not what you said. You asked for a quote from the Koran that advocated violence.
No shit most muslims are peaceful, water is wet.
Now you say the Koran inspires them, but here on the same thread, same page, you are shown to be back pedaling from your original statement.
Fact is, there are Muslims who want to kill Christians in the name of Allah. But they aren't following the Quran in those quests.
I'm not running around scared of all brown people that pray to the east. There is a significant portion of them that use their holy book to justify crimes against humanity. I'm not going to apologize on behalf of the muslims that don't in order to not hurt their feelings.
It's their religion, their reputation. Let their peaceful leaders stand on a podium and renounce these hateful texts. May they provide context for the muslims lacking context to better guide them in their path for salvation. May their actions back up their words.
I strongly recommend that Hondo save these Koran arguments for the guy who's beheading his wife.
You don't read well. I'm just arguing that your preconceived notions are wrong.
FYI, true story. I walked through a Muslim temple (coincidentally with a UW T-shirt on) about 100 miles from Pakistan, in India, and nothing happened to me. It was disgusting and they made us take off our flip flops and walk barefoot. Granted India is peaceful. When I told my father in law, an old school conservative, that I took his daughter through a Muslim temple, he about flipped out.
Like I said, there are Muslims that want to kill us. That I'm not disputing. And some of them even use the Quran as their motivation.
That's not what you said. You asked for a quote from the Koran that advocated violence.
No shit most muslims are peaceful, water is wet.
Now you say the Koran inspires them, but here on the same thread, same page, you are shown to be back pedaling from your original statement.
Fact is, there are Muslims who want to kill Christians in the name of Allah. But they aren't following the Quran in those quests.
I'm not running around scared of all brown people that pray to the east. There is a significant portion of them that use their holy book to justify crimes against humanity. I'm not going to apologize on behalf of the muslims that don't in order to not hurt their feelings.
It's their religion, their reputation. Let their peaceful leaders stand on a podium and renounce these hateful texts. May they provide context for the muslims lacking context to better guide them in their path for salvation. May their actions back up their words.
I strongly recommend that Hondo save these Koran arguments for the guy who's beheading his wife.
We sure have some new school Republicans on the board, completely poisoned by the neoconservatives (former Trotskyites) who have royally fucked up our party. These people are dual citizens with questionable allegiances. Started in earnest in the late Reagan years
I would recommend this book, Suicide of a Superpower by Pat Buchanan:
We sure have some new school Republicans on the board, completely poisoned by the neoconservatives (former Trotskyites) who have royally fucked up our party. These people are dual citizens with questionable allegiances. Started in earnest in the late Reagan years
I would recommend this book, Suicide of a Superpower by Pat Buchanan:
A bit of a stretch to paint with such a broad brush and tag folks in here as neocons. Agreeing with Bibi on the OP topic does not automatically equate to being a neocon. Most non-leftists in here seem opposed to big government solutions. Neocons have no problem with big government as long as it suits their purposes, precisely like the progressives they "oppose". I get the sense that those you're tagging as neocons in here are more libertarian leaning, but some have a healthy dose of reality sprinkled in when it comes to national defense.
We sure have some new school Republicans on the board, completely poisoned by the neoconservatives (former Trotskyites) who have royally fucked up our party. These people are dual citizens with questionable allegiances. Started in earnest in the late Reagan years
I would recommend this book, Suicide of a Superpower by Pat Buchanan:
A bit of a stretch to paint with such a broad brush and tag folks in here as neocons. Agreeing with Bibi on the OP topic does not automatically equate to being a neocon. Most non-leftists in here seem opposed to big government solutions. Neocons have no problem with big government as long as it suits their purposes, precisely like the progressives they "oppose". I get the sense that those you're tagging as neocons in here are more libertarian leaning, but some have a healthy dose of reality sprinkled in when it comes to national defense.
Actually I would say most people on here just want the exact opposite as Obama. And find fault in everything he does, even whined about getting bin ladin.
Then there is a faction like death that read all the conspiracy "news" sites and cartoons and believe that shit.
Netanyahu's Congress speech draws praise in Saudi Arabia, derision in West...
"It is extremely rare for any reasonable person to ever agree with anything Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says or does," wrote Abbas. "However, one must admit, Bibi did get it right, at least when it came to dealing with Iran." According to Abbas, Netanyahu accurately summarized the "clear and present danger" posed by Iran. "What is absurd, however, is that despite this being perhaps the only thing that brings together Arabs and Israelis (as it threatens them all), the only stakeholder that seems not to realize the danger of the situation is President Obama," he wrote.
According to Abbas, Netanyahu accurately summarized the "clear and present danger" posed by Iran.
"What is absurd, however, is that despite this being perhaps the only thing that brings together Arabs and Israelis (as it threatens them all), the only stakeholder that seems not to realize the danger of the situation is President Obama," he wrote.
Netanyahu's Congress speech draws praise in Saudi Arabia, derision in West...
"It is extremely rare for any reasonable person to ever agree with anything Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says or does," wrote Abbas. "However, one must admit, Bibi did get it right, at least when it came to dealing with Iran." According to Abbas, Netanyahu accurately summarized the "clear and present danger" posed by Iran. "What is absurd, however, is that despite this being perhaps the only thing that brings together Arabs and Israelis (as it threatens them all), the only stakeholder that seems not to realize the danger of the situation is President Obama," he wrote.
According to Abbas, Netanyahu accurately summarized the "clear and present danger" posed by Iran.
"What is absurd, however, is that despite this being perhaps the only thing that brings together Arabs and Israelis (as it threatens them all), the only stakeholder that seems not to realize the danger of the situation is President Obama," he wrote.
We sure have some new school Republicans on the board, completely poisoned by the neoconservatives (former Trotskyites) who have royally fucked up our party. These people are dual citizens with questionable allegiances. Started in earnest in the late Reagan years
I would recommend this book, Suicide of a Superpower by Pat Buchanan:
A bit of a stretch to paint with such a broad brush and tag folks in here as neocons. Agreeing with Bibi on the OP topic does not automatically equate to being a neocon. Most non-leftists in here seem opposed to big government solutions. Neocons have no problem with big government as long as it suits their purposes, precisely like the progressives they "oppose". I get the sense that those you're tagging as neocons in here are more libertarian leaning, but some have a healthy dose of reality sprinkled in when it comes to national defense.
Actually I would say most people on here just want the exact opposite as Obama. And find fault in everything he does, even whined about getting bin ladin.
Then there is a faction like death that read all the conspiracy "news" sites and cartoons and believe that shit.
....and there is a faction (or poaster) on this bored that love gargling obama's balls and can't get enough.
Somehow I get the feeling that the thought of war scares the living shit out of you two? Maybe this will help. The quote is 2,500 years old.
Your choices are between Conventional War now; or Nuclear War later. Make the adult choice.
The conservative media has been saying that for thirty years now. And we started the war in Iraq and all it did was make things worse. Yes, let's do that in Iran. Fuck you are stupid.
Congratulations for being the biggest antisemitic asswipe in here. Last month was the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. I really think you should go there and ask for your fucking apology.
Congratulations for being the biggest antisemitic asswipe in here. Last month was the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. I really think you should go there and ask for your fucking apology.
Congratulations for being the biggest antisemitic asswipe in here. Last month was the 70th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. I really think you should go there and ask for your fucking apology.
I would expect nothing less from a muslim apologist such as yourself.
I could insert some ISIS video to go with the Auschwitz video, but Derek would object. He considers children missing their heads to be in bad taste. I'm sure you just consider it the exercise of religious freedom.
Comments
Fucking moron.
I would recommend this book, Suicide of a Superpower by Pat Buchanan:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=3GG1rFA_QEk
A bit of a stretch to paint with such a broad brush and tag folks in here as neocons. Agreeing with Bibi on the OP topic does not automatically equate to being a neocon. Most non-leftists in here seem opposed to big government solutions. Neocons have no problem with big government as long as it suits their purposes, precisely like the progressives they "oppose". I get the sense that those you're tagging as neocons in here are more libertarian leaning, but some have a healthy dose of reality sprinkled in when it comes to national defense.
Then there is a faction like death that read all the conspiracy "news" sites and cartoons and believe that shit.
"It is extremely rare for any reasonable person to ever agree with anything Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says or does," wrote Abbas. "However, one must admit, Bibi did get it right, at least when it came to dealing with Iran." According to Abbas, Netanyahu accurately summarized the "clear and present danger" posed by Iran. "What is absurd, however, is that despite this being perhaps the only thing that brings together Arabs and Israelis (as it threatens them all), the only stakeholder that seems not to realize the danger of the situation is President Obama," he wrote.
According to Abbas, Netanyahu accurately summarized the "clear and present danger" posed by Iran.
"What is absurd, however, is that despite this being perhaps the only thing that brings together Arabs and Israelis (as it threatens them all), the only stakeholder that seems not to realize the danger of the situation is President Obama," he wrote.
haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.645338
Your choices are between Conventional War now; or Nuclear War later. Make the adult choice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=0V0RMf2qU18I could insert some ISIS video to go with the Auschwitz video, but Derek would object. He considers children missing their heads to be in bad taste. I'm sure you just consider it the exercise of religious freedom.