Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

George Soros Paid $196 Million to Lobby For Net Neutrality.

1234568

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,408 Founders Club
    Work for the people. Yeah right. Profit requires the consent of the people. There is nothing wrong with profit. It built this country.

    You obviously have an issue with profits and corporations. You don't have an issue with your government operating in secret about something as vital to the free exercise of speech as the internet

    You don't even wonder why or care.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    Work for the people. Yeah right. Profit requires the consent of the people. There is nothing wrong with profit. It built this country.

    You obviously have an issue with profits and corporations. You don't have an issue with your government operating in secret about something as vital to the free exercise of speech as the internet

    You don't even wonder why or care.

    You don't read well. Both are fucked up. Yes, our country had been successful partly because we were self sustaining on farm land and other resources. Built on that foundation, we have been successful because we encourage growth and free market, with minimal regulations. It's a fine line, but business can't be successful without proper oversight by the government. (Look at counties with zero regulations)

    Net neutrality has nothing to do with free speech. I do wonder about why it's secret. Doesn't mean I'm going to scream crazy shit about tyranny and such. Wait until you actually see it before you scream. Patience.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,408 Founders Club
    I'm not screaming. Both aren't fucked up. Why would I wait to see it before questioning the reasons for the secrecy in the first place? You keep claiming its about net neutrality when you have no idea what its about. You're running cover for Obama as usual. He is a proven liar who has lost the trust of the people.

    Again more straw man arguing. No one has called for zero regulation. You're all over the map to avoid the only issue at hand.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    RaceBannon said:

    I'm not screaming. Both aren't fucked up. Why would I wait to see it before questioning the reasons for the secrecy in the first place? You keep claiming its about net neutrality when you have no idea what its about. You're running cover for Obama as usual. He is a proven liar who has lost the trust of the people.

    Again more straw man arguing. No one has called for zero regulation. You're all over the map to avoid the only issue at hand.

    It's funny how you guys translate what I say. I dont ever cover for Obama. Just because I don't think we are in a depression and I don't think he should be impeached for Benghazi or the other 15 fake scandals, didn't mean I fully support him either. Saying he lied about the $2,500 deal is FS, that was during his campaign and a much different plan than was implemented. The "you can keep your doctor" is valid. In that some people have to change their plan and doctor.

    The reality is, I just question the truth and I don't but into conspiracy theories. 20 years ago, actions like this happened all the time and no one knew. 10 years ago even. Now days with government officials twitting, it's different. Does it make it right? No. Does it mean that there us some secret thing the government is trying to mind fuck us? No. None of us know that until it's published.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,408 Founders Club
    Sure
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • d2d
    d2d Member Posts: 3,109
    Congress is supposed to pass the laws in open debate.

    Article. I, Section. 1.

    All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.

    What part of this sentence don't you understand?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club
    d2d said:

    Congress is supposed to pass the laws in open debate.

    Article. I, Section. 1.

    All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.

    What part of this sentence don't you understand?


    Obama's pen and phone are mightier than that pesky constitution

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8En1zxhaDE
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Is anyone else outraged over the secrecy of the TPP negotiations?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • d2d
    d2d Member Posts: 3,109
    ThomasFremont said:

    Is anyone else outraged over the secrecy of the TPP negotiations?

    I would insert a relevant video here, but Derek won't let me.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    d2d said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    Is anyone else outraged over the secrecy of the TPP negotiations?

    I would insert a relevant video here, but Derek won't let me.

    IS that a yes or a no?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter