Williams was relied on as the reputable face of an entire network to be trustworthy as he delivered facts to the audience.
O'Reilly is an entertainer, whose goal is to inspire controversy and ratings.
If you can't see there's a difference, please go to Iraq and defame ISIS.
Making excuses. A lie is a lie. Both are faces of a news network. The Tag line for fox news is "the most trusted news network", " we report, you decide ", " fair and balanced ".
HTH
It's called a tagline jackass. Foxnews is the right winged MSNBC. Those who don't realize that, life can't help them.
I didn't look into it, but I really don't care. O'Reilly has an agenda, just like Hannity, Oberman, Maddow, etc. Their shows our heavily opinion based, and are often scewed or eggagerated to fit an agenda. Brian Williams position isn't supposed to be opinion based or have an agenda. His fabrications and eggagerated stories created an agenda, and thus undermined the legitimacy of his show and network. His action skewed the show to a Foxnews or MSNBC impression. That is a very big problem, as a lot of viewers watched that show to avoid the biased crap.
Fabrication and extreme eggageration is wrong. But you expect it on one side over the other. If you can't understand the difference between the two, then I don't know what to tell you.
Williams was relied on as the reputable face of an entire network to be trustworthy as he delivered facts to the audience.
O'Reilly is an entertainer, whose goal is to inspire controversy and ratings.
If you can't see there's a difference, please go to Iraq and defame ISIS.
Making excuses. A lie is a lie. Both are faces of a news network. The Tag line for fox news is "the most trusted news network", " we report, you decide ", " fair and balanced ".
HTH
It's called a tagline jackass. Foxnews is the right winged MSNBC. Those who don't realize that, life can't help them.
I didn't look into it, but I really don't care. O'Reilly has an agenda, just like Hannity, Oberman, Maddow, etc. Their shows our heavily opinion based, and are often scewed or eggagerated to fit an agenda. Brian Williams position isn't supposed to be opinion based or have an agenda. His fabrications and eggagerated stories created an agenda, and thus undermined the legitimacy of his show and network. His action skewed the show to a Foxnews or MSNBC impression. That is a very big problem, as a lot of viewers watched that show to avoid the biased crap.
Fabrication and extreme eggageration is wrong. But you expect it on one side over the other. If you can't understand the difference between the two, then I don't know what to tell you.
The problem is, people watch O'Reilly and MSNBC and believe that shit. Opinion or not, both are news that people trust. Here's the difference with me, I don't trust any news. I research myself and look at multiple sources before I make my judgment. The average person in America doesn't, they believe what they see on TV or read on the interwebs.
Williams was relied on as the reputable face of an entire network to be trustworthy as he delivered facts to the audience.
O'Reilly is an entertainer, whose goal is to inspire controversy and ratings.
If you can't see there's a difference, please go to Iraq and defame ISIS.
Making excuses. A lie is a lie. Both are faces of a news network. The Tag line for fox news is "the most trusted news network", " we report, you decide ", " fair and balanced ".
HTH
It's called a tagline jackass. Foxnews is the right winged MSNBC. Those who don't realize that, life can't help them.
I didn't look into it, but I really don't care. O'Reilly has an agenda, just like Hannity, Oberman, Maddow, etc. Their shows our heavily opinion based, and are often scewed or eggagerated to fit an agenda. Brian Williams position isn't supposed to be opinion based or have an agenda. His fabrications and eggagerated stories created an agenda, and thus undermined the legitimacy of his show and network. His action skewed the show to a Foxnews or MSNBC impression. That is a very big problem, as a lot of viewers watched that show to avoid the biased crap.
Fabrication and extreme eggageration is wrong. But you expect it on one side over the other. If you can't understand the difference between the two, then I don't know what to tell you.
The problem is, people watch O'Reilly and MSNBC and believe that shit. Opinion or not, both are news that people trust. Here's the difference with me, I don't trust any news. I research myself and look at HuffPo and Daily Kos before I make my judgment. The average person in America doesn't, they believe what they see on TV or read on the interwebs.
Williams was relied on as the reputable face of an entire network to be trustworthy as he delivered facts to the audience.
O'Reilly is an entertainer, whose goal is to inspire controversy and ratings.
If you can't see there's a difference, please go to Iraq and defame ISIS.
Making excuses. A lie is a lie. Both are faces of a news network. The Tag line for fox news is "the most trusted news network", " we report, you decide ", " fair and balanced ".
HTH
It's called a tagline jackass. Foxnews is the right winged MSNBC. Those who don't realize that, life can't help them.
I didn't look into it, but I really don't care. O'Reilly has an agenda, just like Hannity, Oberman, Maddow, etc. Their shows our heavily opinion based, and are often scewed or eggagerated to fit an agenda. Brian Williams position isn't supposed to be opinion based or have an agenda. His fabrications and eggagerated stories created an agenda, and thus undermined the legitimacy of his show and network. His action skewed the show to a Foxnews or MSNBC impression. That is a very big problem, as a lot of viewers watched that show to avoid the biased crap.
Fabrication and extreme eggageration is wrong. But you expect it on one side over the other. If you can't understand the difference between the two, then I don't know what to tell you.
The problem is, people watch O'Reilly and MSNBC and believe that shit. Opinion or not, both are news that people trust. Here's the difference with me, I don't trust any news. I research myself and look at multiple sources before I make my judgment. The average person in America doesn't, they believe what they see on TV or read on the interwebs.
Comments
I didn't look into it, but I really don't care. O'Reilly has an agenda, just like Hannity, Oberman, Maddow, etc. Their shows our heavily opinion based, and are often scewed or eggagerated to fit an agenda. Brian Williams position isn't supposed to be opinion based or have an agenda. His fabrications and eggagerated stories created an agenda, and thus undermined the legitimacy of his show and network. His action skewed the show to a Foxnews or MSNBC impression. That is a very big problem, as a lot of viewers watched that show to avoid the biased crap.
Fabrication and extreme eggageration is wrong. But you expect it on one side over the other. If you can't understand the difference between the two, then I don't know what to tell you.
I'd guess that the average American feels the same.
cable news
network news