Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Got good news and bad news 4 u guys

2

Comments

  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    Tequilla said:

    dnc said:

    Tequilla said:

    NOGAF about the Apple cup

    HTH

    Yep - good chance that I'll be giving away my Apple Cup tickets this year to head down to watch the Baylor @ TCU game.
    Froog POTD!
















    Hard to blame you.

    Shocked that that game is going to be on Friday and not a prime time game on Saturday.

    I guess it is possible that if the TCU/Baylor game was a noon kickoff in Ft Worth and the UW/WSU game was a 7:30 game in Seattle I could make both ... but the reality is that one is going to be a game between what should be at that point 2 Top 5 teams versus a game where UW maybe is playing to be bowl eligible and the Cougs are a fiery hot mess.
    1) No chance you can make both games in their entirety. Enjoy the game you're going to, don't try and kill yourself to catch some of the Apple Cup.

    2) There's like a 1.8% both TCU and Baylor will be top 5 teams at that poont. Not going to happen. But it's still far, far superior to the Crapple Cup (lol!).
  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,561 Founders Club
    @Tequilla come watch the applecup with the Dallas alumni group
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,954
    brchco12 said:

    @Tequilla come watch the applecup with the Dallas alumni group

    All depends on what time the games are - another option is to go catch a Stars game since they are almost always home on the Wednesday/Friday around Thanksgiving.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,954
    dnc said:

    Tequilla said:

    dnc said:

    Tequilla said:

    NOGAF about the Apple cup

    HTH

    Yep - good chance that I'll be giving away my Apple Cup tickets this year to head down to watch the Baylor @ TCU game.
    Froog POTD!
















    Hard to blame you.

    Shocked that that game is going to be on Friday and not a prime time game on Saturday.

    I guess it is possible that if the TCU/Baylor game was a noon kickoff in Ft Worth and the UW/WSU game was a 7:30 game in Seattle I could make both ... but the reality is that one is going to be a game between what should be at that point 2 Top 5 teams versus a game where UW maybe is playing to be bowl eligible and the Cougs are a fiery hot mess.
    1) No chance you can make both games in their entirety. Enjoy the game you're going to, don't try and kill yourself to catch some of the Apple Cup.

    2) There's like a 1.8% both TCU and Baylor will be top 5 teams at that poont. Not going to happen. But it's still far, far superior to the Crapple Cup (lol!).
    Baylor's schedule before they play TCU next year:

    @ SMU, Lamar, Rice, Texas Tech, @ Kansas, West Virginia, Iowa State, @ KState (Thursday game w/ bye week before that), Oklahoma, @ Okie Lite ... then @ TCU and vs Texas.

    The only games in the above that I think that they have any chance at all of losing would be the KState, Okie Lite, and maybe the Oklahoma game. Would be very surprising honestly if they lost any of those games ... but they are Baylor.

    TCU is probably the better team but have a little more difficult of a schedule.

    @ Minnesota, SF Austin, SMU, @ Tech, Texas, @ KState, @ Iowa St, West Virginia (Thursday game w/ bye week before that), Okie Lite, Kansas, @ Oklahoma, then Baylor (no game after that).

    Now that I think about it, could be interesting to try to do the Okie two-step on November 21st. I'm thinking I can live without going down to Oregon State this year and since that will probably be a 7:30 ESPN game, I can probably watch that after the games in Oklahoma.
  • EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 4,297
    Tequilla said:

    dnc said:

    Tequilla said:

    NOGAF about the Apple cup

    HTH

    Yep - good chance that I'll be giving away my Apple Cup tickets this year to head down to watch the Baylor @ TCU game.
    Froog POTD!
















    Hard to blame you.

    Shocked that that game is going to be on Friday and not a prime time game on Saturday.

    I guess it is possible that if the TCU/Baylor game was a noon kickoff in Ft Worth and the UW/WSU game was a 7:30 game in Seattle I could make both ... but the reality is that one is going to be a game between what should be at that point 2 Top 5 teams versus a game where UW maybe is playing to be bowl eligible and the Cougs are a fiery hot mess.
    Two top 5 teams? Maybe, maybe, maybe two of the top fifteen or twenty five. Did I say maybe?

    The selection committee isn't suddenly going to get Grinolds FS. They, like all intelligent football people, realize those that are afraid to play tough non conf schedules or a championship game don't deserve top five status. One, like TCU did last year, could get lucky again. Two? Lets say odds are that other potential top five teams aren't the paper tigers that TCU and Baylor are.


    HTH
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,954
    EwaDawg said:

    Tequilla said:

    dnc said:

    Tequilla said:

    NOGAF about the Apple cup

    HTH

    Yep - good chance that I'll be giving away my Apple Cup tickets this year to head down to watch the Baylor @ TCU game.
    Froog POTD!
















    Hard to blame you.

    Shocked that that game is going to be on Friday and not a prime time game on Saturday.

    I guess it is possible that if the TCU/Baylor game was a noon kickoff in Ft Worth and the UW/WSU game was a 7:30 game in Seattle I could make both ... but the reality is that one is going to be a game between what should be at that point 2 Top 5 teams versus a game where UW maybe is playing to be bowl eligible and the Cougs are a fiery hot mess.
    Two top 5 teams? Maybe, maybe, maybe two of the top fifteen or twenty five. Did I say maybe?

    The selection committee isn't suddenly going to get Grinolds FS. They, like all intelligent football people, realize those that are afraid to play tough non conf schedules or a championship game don't deserve top five status. One, like TCU did last year, could get lucky again. Two? Lets say odds are that other potential top five teams aren't the paper tigers that TCU and Baylor are.


    HTH
    You're insanely FS if you think that.

    The Big 12 can't have a title game due to the number of teams in the league. Same problem with an at-large like Notre Dame if they are in that situation. And let's be honest, if Notre Dame was in that situation they aren't going to be penalized for not having a conference title game.

    The reason both TCU and Baylor got excluded last year is very, very simple. TCU was the better team - everybody knew it. Baylor beat TCU. By most sane logic, Baylor was the deserving Big 12 representative - yet wasn't the best team in their conference. They proved as much by losing to Sparty. TCU proved that they were the best team by making Ole Miss look like what Ole Miss looks like most years that they aren't good.

    The whole schedule argument is also BS. Both Big 12 teams play 9 conference opponents. TCU has a home/home with Minnesota that they finish up this year. In future years they have home/home series on the schedule with Arkansas and Ohio State. You can criticize them for playing SMU each year until you realize it's a rivalry game that has been played for 100 years. Hard to be overly critical of that one with regard to TCU. Could also be critical of a D2 opponent as well, but until we get critical of everybody else playing one, it's hard to be critical of TCU or Baylor for scheduling those teams. Baylor you can be a little more critical of because SMU isn't a unique rival to them and the only games on their non-conference schedule against a Power5 conference team through 2019 is a home/home against Duke.

    And if you can't see that the odds of TCU and Baylor getting to November 21st (the weekend they both play road games in the state of Oklahoma) undefeated being probably better than 50/50, and the odds that both will be undefeated going into their game the day after Thanksgiving are better than Sark's odds of winning the PAC next year, then I can't help you. Even those that like to give me shit for froooging it up will tell you that I'm not blowing smoke on this one.
  • DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,627 Founders Club
    edited February 2015
    EwaDawg said:

    Tequilla said:

    dnc said:

    Tequilla said:

    NOGAF about the Apple cup

    HTH

    Yep - good chance that I'll be giving away my Apple Cup tickets this year to head down to watch the Baylor @ TCU game.
    Froog POTD!
















    Hard to blame you.

    Shocked that that game is going to be on Friday and not a prime time game on Saturday.

    I guess it is possible that if the TCU/Baylor game was a noon kickoff in Ft Worth and the UW/WSU game was a 7:30 game in Seattle I could make both ... but the reality is that one is going to be a game between what should be at that point 2 Top 5 teams versus a game where UW maybe is playing to be bowl eligible and the Cougs are a fiery hot mess.
    Two top 5 teams? Maybe, maybe, maybe two of the top fifteen or twenty five. Did I say maybe?

    The selection committee isn't suddenly going to get Grinolds FS. They, like all intelligent football people, realize those that are afraid to play tough non conf schedules or a championship game don't deserve top five status. One, like TCU did last year, could get lucky again. Two? Lets say odds are that other potential top five teams aren't the paper tigers that TCU and Baylor are.


    HTH
    Read this post then grabbed the popcorn waiting for Tequilla.

    The Froog delivered.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 108,173 Founders Club
    The committee got it right
  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,561 Founders Club
    Ain't nobody got time for Christian school drama.

    And you are judged by the friends you keep.

    That said, TCU does it right Baylor does it wrong, if they're both undefeated in nov they'll be top 5-7 and it will be a juicy rematch.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,954
    You do realize that TCU will be a Top 3 team at worst by the start of the season? Most likely #2 behind Ohio State?
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,326 Founders Club

    The committee got it right

    They did, but they got the seeding wrong and shot their wad early. Sugar Bowl got #1 v #2.
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    edited February 2015
    haie said:

    You and Mosster should go give each other hand jobs while watching videos of the 2008 huskies team and then go light yourselves on fire.

    In other news I have the cuogs being WAC-level pathetic again and more Duck tears at the end of the season when quooks realize 2014 was the only year that ever would have been special.


    Hey we have the Doog version of PDX! Boise is going to crush UW. The coaching talent from the Peterman regime is still in Boise.

    I remember Doogs saying 2010 was the only chance to be special too. There is always 2017 when you can look forward to 2019. Go pretend you remember 1991.

    #special
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,897 Swaye's Wigwam
    Mosster47 said:

    haie said:

    You and Mosster should go give each other hand jobs while watching videos of the 2008 huskies team and then go light yourselves on fire.

    In other news I have the cuogs being WAC-level pathetic again and more Duck tears at the end of the season when quooks realize 2014 was the only year that ever would have been special.


    Hey we have the Doog version of PDX! Boise is going to crush UW. The coaching talent from the Peterman regime is still in Boise.

    I remember Doogs saying 2010 was the only chance to be special too. There is always 2017 when you can look forward to 2019. Go pretend you remember 1991.

    #special
    Go to the AZ forum where you belong, fucktard
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 31,026 Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    haie said:

    You and Mosster should go give each other hand jobs while watching videos of the 2008 huskies team and then go light yourselves on fire.

    In other news I have the cuogs being WAC-level pathetic again and more Duck tears at the end of the season when quooks realize 2014 was the only year that ever would have been special.


    Hey we have the Doog version of PDX! Boise is going to crush UW. The coaching talent from the Peterman regime is still in Boise.

    I remember Doogs saying 2010 was the only chance to be special too. There is always 2017 when you can look forward to 2019. Go pretend you remember 1991.

    #special
    No pretending needed...which just means I'm getting old.
  • SpoonieLuvSpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,459
    Mosster47 said:

    haie said:

    You and Mosster should go give each other hand jobs while watching videos of the 2008 huskies team and then go light yourselves on fire.

    In other news I have the cuogs being WAC-level pathetic again and more Duck tears at the end of the season when quooks realize 2014 was the only year that ever would have been special.


    Hey we have the Doog version of PDX! Boise is going to crush UW. The coaching talent from the Peterman regime is still in Boise.

    I remember Doogs saying 2010 was the only chance to be special too. There is always 2017 when you can look forward to 2019. Go pretend you remember 1991.

    #special
    image
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    edited February 2015
    Say what you want about Moss, that's quality trolling.

    image
    image
  • haiehaie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,295 Swaye's Wigwam
    AZDuck said:

    Say what you want about Moss, that's quality trolling.

    No, quality trolling is mentioning the 2014 Natty and getting a reply of "1991 UW SUX 2017 SPECIAL SPECIAL 2010 LOCKNER LOLOL 9119 17 WILL BE SPECIAL LOCKNER LOL". It's the typical butthurt response I get from pretend-Duck fans such as him.

    For the record, I don't remember 1991 and rarely ever even bring it up, unless I know it's going to perturb winners-at-life such as Mosster. I remember the 2000 huskies though, who never got a chance to play in a college football playoff. So duck fans can go ahead and give up their vaginal-bleeding over the 91 team being voted a trophy.
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    haie said:

    AZDuck said:

    Say what you want about Moss, that's quality trolling.

    No, quality trolling is mentioning the 2014 Natty and getting a reply of "1991 UW SUX 2017 SPECIAL SPECIAL 2010 LOCKNER LOLOL 9119 17 WILL BE SPECIAL LOCKNER LOL". It's the typical butthurt response I get from pretend-Duck fans such as him.

    For the record, I don't remember 1991 and rarely ever even bring it up, unless I know it's going to perturb winners-at-life such as Mosster. I remember the 2000 huskies though, who never got a chance to play in a college football playoff. So duck fans can go ahead and give up their vaginal-bleeding over the 91 team being voted a trophy.

    I remember UW in 2000 too! Joey started if off by hitting Peele sliding through the end zone and Matt Smith ended it batting down Tui's pass. Ducks win. Same as it ever was.

    In your one miracle memory UW still loses to Oregon.

    #special
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    Mosster47 said:

    haie said:

    AZDuck said:

    Say what you want about Moss, that's quality trolling.

    No, quality trolling is mentioning the 2014 Natty and getting a reply of "1991 UW SUX 2017 SPECIAL SPECIAL 2010 LOCKNER LOLOL 9119 17 WILL BE SPECIAL LOCKNER LOL". It's the typical butthurt response I get from pretend-Duck fans such as him.

    For the record, I don't remember 1991 and rarely ever even bring it up, unless I know it's going to perturb winners-at-life such as Mosster. I remember the 2000 huskies though, who never got a chance to play in a college football playoff. So duck fans can go ahead and give up their vaginal-bleeding over the 91 team being voted a trophy.

    I remember UW in 2000 too! Joey started if off by hitting Peele sliding through the end zone and Matt Smith ended it batting down Tui's pass. Ducks win. Same as it ever was.

    In your one miracle memory UW still loses to Oregon.

    #special
    Except that wasn't the case back then at all.

    But I'm sure you don't remember that since you were at UA.
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    dnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    haie said:

    AZDuck said:

    Say what you want about Moss, that's quality trolling.

    No, quality trolling is mentioning the 2014 Natty and getting a reply of "1991 UW SUX 2017 SPECIAL SPECIAL 2010 LOCKNER LOLOL 9119 17 WILL BE SPECIAL LOCKNER LOL". It's the typical butthurt response I get from pretend-Duck fans such as him.

    For the record, I don't remember 1991 and rarely ever even bring it up, unless I know it's going to perturb winners-at-life such as Mosster. I remember the 2000 huskies though, who never got a chance to play in a college football playoff. So duck fans can go ahead and give up their vaginal-bleeding over the 91 team being voted a trophy.

    I remember UW in 2000 too! Joey started if off by hitting Peele sliding through the end zone and Matt Smith ended it batting down Tui's pass. Ducks win. Same as it ever was.

    In your one miracle memory UW still loses to Oregon.

    #special
    Except that wasn't the case back then at all.

    But I'm sure you don't remember that since you were at UA.
    1994 (birth of college football) thru 2000:

    Oregon 5, Washington 2.

Sign In or Register to comment.