Beezlebub isn't being quite as cunty in this thread as others. Must have gotten a handjob at YMCA locker room last night.
Washington produces a fair amount of Pac 12 quality players, and even a fair amount of Pac 12 star players. UW has no built in advantage with the guys in California, Oregon, or anywhere else. They only have that in Washington. USC, UCLA, and even Cal make use of their geographic advantage in recruiting. The core of all of their classes is from their core geographic area. It has to be the same for Washington.
Look what happens when you lose that. Jonathon Stewart left the state at a time when we had shit for running backs. Josh Garnett, Walker Williams, and Zach Banner left at a time when we had shit offensive linemen (remember Steve Schilling...good example of the same). Keivarre (however the fuck you spell it) Russell left and was a freshman starter at Notre Dame. Think he might have helped the UW secondary last year?
When your state produces talent you have to reel them in at a high rate, until such time as you turn into Oregon. Otherwise your roster starts to look like Oregon State's (or WSU's...or UW's). I don't think UW is going to turn into Oregon...ever.
Thanks for noticing, I'm a recruiting junkie it does bring out a reasonable side to me, don't take it as weakness
Sark was smart avoiding most of over rated local guys anyone who follows recruiting at all will tell u theres probably about 5 pac 12 recruits a year. If Petersen wants to go crazy and lock down state u guys will never get over the hump.
Another dumbshit poast by beelzecunt......
Of the 8 in-state players signed by UW this year, 6 of them had WSU offers. I'm guessing that number would be 8/8 if WSU's in-state recruiting wasn't so lazy, as Sterk & Warren look to have potential and WSU isn't exactly loaded at DE/Buck.
For 2016, UW has offers out to 4 in-state kids, while WSU has offers out to 5.
This has nothing to do with Cougs competing with Huskies. i dont want Cougs to load up with in state guys, u cant win with only 5 guys in most years , 8 in a great year for recruiting. i give u guys a hard time about Petersen but in all seriousness he will be successful only if he can make a dent in Calif recruiting not by locking up in state. In state guys are the start of class but u get most of guys from Cal and couple from other states. So far recruiting wise relative to Pac 12 powers i dont think he did as well in Cal as he should have.
Sark made a dent in California without giving a shit about WA kids and got mediocre results. I thought the blueprint has always been lock up the best WA players and supplement with California kids?
Has Washington ever had a class majority made up of Washington kids? If no i dont see how u supplement with Cal kids. An interesting question to ask, during height of Glory years under Don James were most Washington Kids?
UW's current roster has 31 players from WA out of a total of 101. 2015 recruiting had 8 WA commits out of 24. Why do you poast about shit that you know absolutely nothing about?
And why the fuck do you care whether or not UW recruits in-state or out-of-state. You should focus on the idiot head coach of yours, his shitty recruiting and your team's performance on the field. You know, 3-9.
U proved my point u can't win totally relying on Washington kids, ur own numbers show only 30 percent of roster is local, about 6 a year based on 5 year cycle.u have to recruit the hell out of Cali and supplement with state kids.
I think there are usually 30-40% washington kids on the roster, but like it's been mentioned Sark lost a decent chunk of would be dawgs and supplemented them with Cali recruits. I looked at an incomplete account of the 91 roster off a google search and it showed 31 of the 80 as being from washington which is a little more than 38%.
I don't think Pete did anything out of the norm with this class, he pretty much stuck to the script. 8/24 = 33%
Beezlebub isn't being quite as cunty in this thread as others. Must have gotten a handjob at YMCA locker room last night.
Washington produces a fair amount of Pac 12 quality players, and even a fair amount of Pac 12 star players. UW has no built in advantage with the guys in California, Oregon, or anywhere else. They only have that in Washington. USC, UCLA, and even Cal make use of their geographic advantage in recruiting. The core of all of their classes is from their core geographic area. It has to be the same for Washington.
Look what happens when you lose that. Jonathon Stewart left the state at a time when we had shit for running backs. Josh Garnett, Walker Williams, and Zach Banner left at a time when we had shit offensive linemen (remember Steve Schilling...good example of the same). Keivarre (however the fuck you spell it) Russell left and was a freshman starter at Notre Dame. Think he might have helped the UW secondary last year?
When your state produces talent you have to reel them in at a high rate, until such time as you turn into Oregon. Otherwise your roster starts to look like Oregon State's (or WSU's...or UW's). I don't think UW is going to turn into Oregon...ever.
Thanks for noticing, I'm a recruiting junkie it does bring out a reasonable side to me, don't take it as weakness
Beezlebub isn't being quite as cunty in this thread as others. Must have gotten a handjob at YMCA locker room last night.
Washington produces a fair amount of Pac 12 quality players, and even a fair amount of Pac 12 star players. UW has no built in advantage with the guys in California, Oregon, or anywhere else. They only have that in Washington. USC, UCLA, and even Cal make use of their geographic advantage in recruiting. The core of all of their classes is from their core geographic area. It has to be the same for Washington.
Look what happens when you lose that. Jonathon Stewart left the state at a time when we had shit for running backs. Josh Garnett, Walker Williams, and Zach Banner left at a time when we had shit offensive linemen (remember Steve Schilling...good example of the same). Keivarre (however the fuck you spell it) Russell left and was a freshman starter at Notre Dame. Think he might have helped the UW secondary last year?
When your state produces talent you have to reel them in at a high rate, until such time as you turn into Oregon. Otherwise your roster starts to look like Oregon State's (or WSU's...or UW's). I don't think UW is going to turn into Oregon...ever.
Thanks for noticing, I'm a recruiting junkie it does bring out a reasonable side to me, don't take it as weakness
Beezlebub isn't being quite as cunty in this thread as others. Must have gotten a handjob at YMCA locker room last night.
Washington produces a fair amount of Pac 12 quality players, and even a fair amount of Pac 12 star players. UW has no built in advantage with the guys in California, Oregon, or anywhere else. They only have that in Washington. USC, UCLA, and even Cal make use of their geographic advantage in recruiting. The core of all of their classes is from their core geographic area. It has to be the same for Washington.
Look what happens when you lose that. Jonathon Stewart left the state at a time when we had shit for running backs. Josh Garnett, Walker Williams, and Zach Banner left at a time when we had shit offensive linemen (remember Steve Schilling...good example of the same). Keivarre (however the fuck you spell it) Russell left and was a freshman starter at Notre Dame. Think he might have helped the UW secondary last year?
When your state produces talent you have to reel them in at a high rate, until such time as you turn into Oregon. Otherwise your roster starts to look like Oregon State's (or WSU's...or UW's). I don't think UW is going to turn into Oregon...ever.
Thanks for noticing, I'm a recruiting junkie it does bring out a reasonable side to me, don't take it as weakness
Comments
I don't think Pete did anything out of the norm with this class, he pretty much stuck to the script. 8/24 = 33%