Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pac-10/12 Teams that have won 10+ games the last 5 years...........

2

Comments

  • IMALOSER_
    IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158
    edited August 2013
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    IMALOSER_ said:



    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    I noticed all 3 teams had one thing in common.....they changed coaches/ coaches left.

    There goes the "coaching stability" argument that Baird is the leader of.

    I noticed Oregon and Stanford both hired Offensive Coordinators with no head coaching experience. I guess we can expect both to end up 7-6.
    Sark only had 2 years of being an OC while Shaw had 4. In terms of overall experience Shaw had a lot more. The same can be said of Kelly who was an OC for far longer than Sark. Most important both of those guys inherited good programs.
    I wasn't talking about Kelly. I guess that means that there have been 3 OC's with no head coaching experience hired for those 3 programs. Kelly and Harbaugh both were the OC and play callers at their respective schools. Those that think Shaw and Helfrich had more experience than Sark are really reaching. Thanks for pointing that out.

    Shaw = Kiesau

    HTH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IMALOSER_
    IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158
    edited August 2013
    ..
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,502 Founders Club
    Those that think Sark is anywhere close to those guys needs gasoline and matches. Sark was a bad hire and is a bad coach. Get his dick out of your mouth and pay attention
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IMALOSER_
    IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158
    RaceBannon said:

    Those that think Sark is anywhere close to those guys needs gasoline and matches. Sark was a bad hire and is a bad coach. Get his dick out of your mouth and pay attention

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    The Baird drumming the coaching stability line holds absolutely no relevance in today's win at all costs era. Coaching continuity is a myth. Since sark was hired I think Nansen is the only coach left from the greatest coaching staff in America.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    IMALOSER_ said:

    ..

    Easily your most insightful and valuable contribution to this board to date.

    Keep up the good work.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TheKobeStopper
    TheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959
    edited August 2013
    IMALOSER_ said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    IMALOSER_ said:



    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    I noticed all 3 teams had one thing in common.....they changed coaches/ coaches left.

    There goes the "coaching stability" argument that Baird is the leader of.

    I noticed Oregon and Stanford both hired Offensive Coordinators with no head coaching experience. I guess we can expect both to end up 7-6.
    Sark only had 2 years of being an OC while Shaw had 4. In terms of overall experience Shaw had a lot more. The same can be said of Kelly who was an OC for far longer than Sark. Most important both of those guys inherited good programs.
    I wasn't talking about Kelly. I guess that means that there have been 3 OC's with no head coaching experience hired for those 3 programs. Kelly and Harbaugh both were the OC and play callers at their respective schools. Those that think Shaw and Helfrich had more experience than Sark are really reaching. Thanks for pointing that out.

    Shaw = Kiesau

    HTH
    I'm lost. Can someone translate this idiots dumbfuckery for me?

    Thanks in advance.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    jecornel said:

    The Baird drumming the coaching stability line holds absolutely no relevance in today's win at all costs era. Coaching continuity is a myth. Since sark was hired I think Nansen is the only coach left from the greatest coaching staff in America.

    Nansen was kept because he's Sark's buddy. He's the most useless guy on the staff. He's coached DL now special teams and RBs. Never coached these positions before. Was a LB as a player.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    jecornel said:

    The Baird drumming the coaching stability line holds absolutely no relevance in today's win at all costs era. Coaching continuity is a myth. Since sark was hired I think Nansen is the only coach left from the greatest coaching staff in America.

    Nansen was kept because he's Sark's buddy. He's the most useless guy on the staff. He's coached DL now special teams and RBs. Never coached these positions before. Was a LB as a player.
    Notice the first two stops that particular unit sucked ass too. I don't get why Sark carries dead weight like Nansen and Cozz around.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    HeretoBeatmyChest said:

    jecornel said:

    The Baird drumming the coaching stability line holds absolutely no relevance in today's win at all costs era. Coaching continuity is a myth. Since sark was hired I think Nansen is the only coach left from the greatest coaching staff in America.

    Nansen was kept because he's Sark's buddy. He's the most useless guy on the staff. He's coached DL now special teams and RBs. Never coached these positions before. Was a LB as a player.
    Notice the first two stops that particular unit sucked ass too. I don't get why Sark carries dead weight like Nansen and Cozz around.
    It took an epic plunger rape for him to fire Holt, and he hated doing it even then.

    When you are buddies with everyone, firing people is hard.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter