SEC SEC SEC and a familiar note about Sark
There are a few exceptions, though, and they could provide a glimpse of which “down” programs are most likely to break through in the near future.
The chief example is USC, whose projected sixth-rated class is laden with offensive skill-position talent. If Steve Sarkisian can seal the deal with defensive tackle Rasheem Green and the aforementioned Marshall, the Trojans could make a late push to challenge Bama for the top spot.
But why is USC going to suck under Sark?
Comments
-
I would normally bash Sark, but he has four highly rated OL commits including the #1 G. I don't think USC will suck, but Sark's teams will always lose games they shouldn't.
-
It's one thing to recruit linemen, it's another to develop them. #IvanStrongRoadDawg55 said:I would normally bash Sark, but he has four highly rated OL commits including the #1 G. I don't think USC will suck, but Sark's teams will always lose games they shouldn't.
-
The problem for USC with Sark is that they will never recruit a head coach while he's there.
-
From what I follow this is wrong. SC is going sign probably the #2 class in the country tomorrow that is heavy on DL, LB, and Secondary, and very light on WRs.
Today Sark just beat Urban for a DL from Utah. I hate Sark, but he's going to sign a giant class.
If you want something to mock Sark about, look at who he just hired as an OL coach. -
One if the things over the years that never ceases to amaze is how bad some USC teams have been despite always having great talent. Suck is relative I guess. 8-4 sucks at USC. They have had clowns that went 3-8 there.RoadDawg55 said:I would normally bash Sark, but he has four highly rated OL commits including the #1 G. I don't think USC will suck, but Sark's teams will always lose games they shouldn't.
At USC you have 15 of the best players in So Cal that will go there every year if I was the coach.
I have little doubt that Sark will not develop the talent and programs like Oregon will boat race them. Carroll was having a tough time with Oregon when he left. I think after this year Petersen will do well against USC as long as Sark is there -
Carroll was having a rougher time in general when he left. He even lost to Sark. No doubt, had Carroll stayed, they would have bounced back quickly, and no doubt, Sark will perpetually underperform there, but USC's football program goes through cycles just like every other college football program does. Their lows just tend to not be as low, and their highs tend to eclipse all but the most elite.RaceBannon said:
One if the things over the years that never ceases to amaze is how bad some USC teams have been despite always having great talent. Suck is relative I guess. 8-4 sucks at USC. They have had clowns that went 3-8 there.RoadDawg55 said:I would normally bash Sark, but he has four highly rated OL commits including the #1 G. I don't think USC will suck, but Sark's teams will always lose games they shouldn't.
At USC you have 15 of the best players in So Cal that will go there every year if I was the coach.
I have little doubt that Sark will not develop the talent and programs like Oregon will boat race them. Carroll was having a tough time with Oregon when he left. I think after this year Petersen will do well against USC as long as Sark is there -
Kim is still gargling Sark on dawgman. He posted today about how Sark is killing it over there and proving the "Sark haters" wrong. He also said once again that if anybody tried to hack the thread with their anti-Sark agenda, he would delete it.
The good news is, people are starting to turn on him for this bullshit. Our own Thomas Fremont (kudos) said it best "So even 2 years after he's gone, there's still a rule against saying anything negative about Sark on this site?" Someone else threw in a Joey's reference. I'm assuming the thread goes poof or gets locked any second now -
I love TBS but acting like the TBS natty means anything (especially when won by Sark's Patron swilling ass) is stoooooooopit.
My god. -
I called that would happen weeks ago.bananasnblondes said:Kim is still gargling Sark on dawgman. He posted today about how Sark is killing it over there and proving the "Sark haters" wrong. He also said once again that if anybody tried to hack the thread with their anti-Sark agenda, he would delete it.
The good news is, people are starting to turn on him for this bullshit. Our own Thomas Fremont (kudos) said it best "So even 2 years after he's gone, there's still a rule against saying anything negative about Sark on this site?" Someone else threw in a Joey's reference. I'm assuming the thread goes poof or gets locked any second now
BSRYK
-
TBS Natty would be an awesome album name.Dennis_DeYoung said:I love TBS but acting like the TBS natty means anything (especially when won by Sark's Patron swilling ass) is stoooooooopit.
My god.
