SEC SEC SEC and a familiar note about Sark

RaceBannon

grantland.com/the-triangle/national-signing-day-2015-five-story-lines-alabama-usc-tennessee-ohio-state-byron-cowart-iman-marshall/

There are a few exceptions, though, and they could provide a glimpse of which “down” programs are most likely to break through in the near future.

The chief example is USC, whose projected sixth-rated class is laden with offensive skill-position talent. If Steve Sarkisian can seal the deal with defensive tackle Rasheem Green and the aforementioned Marshall, the Trojans could make a late push to challenge Bama for the top spot.







But why is USC going to suck under Sark?

RoadDawg55

I would normally bash Sark, but he has four highly rated OL commits including the #1 G. I don't think USC will suck, but Sark's teams will always lose games they shouldn't.

DerekJohnson

RoadDawg55 said:

I would normally bash Sark, but he has four highly rated OL commits including the #1 G. I don't think USC will suck, but Sark's teams will always lose games they shouldn't.

It's one thing to recruit linemen, it's another to develop them. #IvanStrong

whatshouldicareabout

The problem for USC with Sark is that they will never recruit a head coach while he's there.

BallSacked

From what I follow this is wrong. SC is going sign probably the #2 class in the country tomorrow that is heavy on DL, LB, and Secondary, and very light on WRs.

Today Sark just beat Urban for a DL from Utah. I hate Sark, but he's going to sign a giant class.

If you want something to mock Sark about, look at who he just hired as an OL coach.

RaceBannon

RoadDawg55 said:

I would normally bash Sark, but he has four highly rated OL commits including the #1 G. I don't think USC will suck, but Sark's teams will always lose games they shouldn't.

One if the things over the years that never ceases to amaze is how bad some USC teams have been despite always having great talent. Suck is relative I guess. 8-4 sucks at USC. They have had clowns that went 3-8 there.

At USC you have 15 of the best players in So Cal that will go there every year if I was the coach.

I have little doubt that Sark will not develop the talent and programs like Oregon will boat race them. Carroll was having a tough time with Oregon when he left. I think after this year Petersen will do well against USC as long as Sark is there

Southerndawg

RaceBannon said:

RoadDawg55 said:

I would normally bash Sark, but he has four highly rated OL commits including the #1 G. I don't think USC will suck, but Sark's teams will always lose games they shouldn't.

One if the things over the years that never ceases to amaze is how bad some USC teams have been despite always having great talent. Suck is relative I guess. 8-4 sucks at USC. They have had clowns that went 3-8 there.

At USC you have 15 of the best players in So Cal that will go there every year if I was the coach.

I have little doubt that Sark will not develop the talent and programs like Oregon will boat race them. Carroll was having a tough time with Oregon when he left. I think after this year Petersen will do well against USC as long as Sark is there

Carroll was having a rougher time in general when he left. He even lost to Sark. No doubt, had Carroll stayed, they would have bounced back quickly, and no doubt, Sark will perpetually underperform there, but USC's football program goes through cycles just like every other college football program does. Their lows just tend to not be as low, and their highs tend to eclipse all but the most elite.

bananasnblondes

Kim is still gargling Sark on dawgman. He posted today about how Sark is killing it over there and proving the "Sark haters" wrong. He also said once again that if anybody tried to hack the thread with their anti-Sark agenda, he would delete it.

The good news is, people are starting to turn on him for this bullshit. Our own Thomas Fremont (kudos) said it best "So even 2 years after he's gone, there's still a rule against saying anything negative about Sark on this site?" Someone else threw in a Joey's reference. I'm assuming the thread goes poof or gets locked any second now

Dennis_DeYoung

I love TBS but acting like the TBS natty means anything (especially when won by Sark's Patron swilling ass) is stoooooooopit.

My god.

BallSacked

bananasnblondes said:

Kim is still gargling Sark on dawgman. He posted today about how Sark is killing it over there and proving the "Sark haters" wrong. He also said once again that if anybody tried to hack the thread with their anti-Sark agenda, he would delete it.

The good news is, people are starting to turn on him for this bullshit. Our own Thomas Fremont (kudos) said it best "So even 2 years after he's gone, there's still a rule against saying anything negative about Sark on this site?" Someone else threw in a Joey's reference. I'm assuming the thread goes poof or gets locked any second now

I called that would happen weeks ago.

BSRYK

WilburHooksHands

Dennis_DeYoung said:

I love TBS but acting like the TBS natty means anything (especially when won by Sark's Patron swilling ass) is stoooooooopit.

My god.

TBS Natty would be an awesome album name.

FremontTroll

bananasnblondes said:

Kim is still gargling Sark on dawgman. He posted today about how Sark is killing it over there and proving the "Sark haters" wrong. He also said once again that if anybody tried to hack the thread with their anti-Sark agenda, he would delete it.

The good news is, people are starting to turn on him for this bullshit. Our own Thomas Fremont (kudos) said it best "So even 2 years after he's gone, there's still a rule against saying anything negative about Sark on this site?" Someone else threw in a Joey's reference. I'm assuming the thread goes poof or gets locked any second now

Free pub! (Almost.)

DugtheDoog

bananasnblondes said:

Kim is still gargling Sark on dawgman. He posted today about how Sark is killing it over there and proving the "Sark haters" wrong. He also said once again that if anybody tried to hack the thread with their anti-Sark agenda, he would delete it.

The good news is, people are starting to turn on him for this bullshit. Our own Thomas Fremont (kudos) said it best "So even 2 years after he's gone, there's still a rule against saying anything negative about Sark on this site?" Someone else threw in a Joey's reference. I'm assuming the thread goes poof or gets locked any second now

I haven't taken a look in the past couple days, but his shit is just embarrassing. I took a gander over the weekend for some belly laughs and Kent started a thread just to say that the class is boring and solid...but had to take his potshot and also say it's "unspectacular" and that just like on the field, Petersen still needs to adjust to the Pac12 in recruiting. What the fuck does that even mean? As if so many of Sark's classes here were "spectacular"?

Coke>Pepsi should have Griswold take the re-rating test and give him the results. I wonder if he would rate guys like Kohler and James Johnson a 4 just so he could be right. I'd also slip Durocher in there to see if Kent gives him a 5 and pops a boner vicariously through fake stories he was once told.

FremontTroll

I'm hearing that Justice Earl Warren is pumped to be a dawg.

You can pay me my $10.95 for February now. Cash or card.

MisterEm

Grinolds gonna Grinolds.

#FTG

AEB

Pete Carroll inherited a shitty USC team that included Carson Palmer, Troy Polomalu, Jacob Rodgers, Mike Patterson, Keary Colbert and a bunch of others I'm too lazy to look-up.

If you can't understand that Paul Hackett can recruit at SC than of course Sark is going to. He's not the coach that Carroll is and SC will underperform. That I'm certain of.

Southerndawg

AEB said:

Pete Carroll inherited a shitty USC team that included Carson Palmer, Troy Polomalu, Jacob Rodgers, Mike Patterson, Keary Colbert and a bunch of others I'm too lazy to look-up.

If you can't understand that Paul Hackett can recruit at SC than of course Sark is going to. He's not the coach that Carroll is and SC will underperform. That I'm certain of.

Quit plagiarism my shit fucko

MrsPetersen

FremontTroll said:

You can pay me my $10.95 for February now. Cash or card.

No PayPal? What is this? 1995? I'm out

CokeGreaterThanPepsi

You guys have to remember that USC the last 75 years has REALLY struggled in recruiting, it is only since Sark got there that things finally turned around. If you can't see that I can't help any of you.

Side note: @BallSacked who did USC hire as OL coach, either I missed it or forgot...

AEB

Southerndawg said:

AEB said:

Pete Carroll inherited a shitty USC team that included Carson Palmer, Troy Polomalu, Jacob Rodgers, Mike Patterson, Keary Colbert and a bunch of others I'm too lazy to look-up.

If you can't understand that Paul Hackett can recruit at SC than of course Sark is going to. He's not the coach that Carroll is and SC will underperform. That I'm certain of.

Quit plagiarism my shit fucko

#SarksaShittyCoachSuperiorityGuy

BallSacked

CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

You guys have to remember that USC the last 75 years has REALLY struggled in recruiting, it is only since Sark got there that things finally turned around. If you can't see that I can't help any of you.

Side note: @BallSacked who did USC hire as OL coach, either I missed it or forgot...

Bob Connolly. Most Broons view him as the worst asst coach we've had in many many years, horrible coach and worse recruiter. He was at UCLA for one year under Dorrell and fired.

Todd Graham hired him to his first staff at ASU, and fired him at the end of that first year. Okie State had him for this past year and let him go after the cactus bowl.

He was the OL coach for Price at Wazzu and was retained at Alabama by Shula but was one of the first coaches let go from that staff. He's a horrible coach and many Broons are saying it's indicative of Sarks thin Rolodex in the industry and/or lack of respect by his peers. Truly an awful hire. Their OL is very talented, but mainly 2nd year guys so bad coaching could be a problem for them next year.