Home› Mariners Baby! + Other Sports

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Thomas Fremont: Regarding Upshaw

RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
in Mariners Baby! + Other Sports
http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Robert-Upshaw-6447/

#1 ranked sophomore.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited January 2015
    Yeah at this points the odds of him returning are 0.
    Goss should stay and improve his jumper, right now he's a mid 2nd round pick at best
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,800
    NWG returns. No question.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Upshaw is going lottery and is the best big guy of the Romar era.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,453 Founders Club
    Draft express is your source?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    edited January 2015
    FREE PUB!!!

    I have always been much more critical of NWG than Upshaw. I maintain that I'd rather have Brockman, mostly because I don't give a fuck what these guys go on to do in the NBA. Brockman is a better college player.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    ThomasFremont said:

    FREE PUB!!!

    I have always been much more critical of NWG than Upshaw. I maintain that I'd rather have Brockman, mostly because I don't give a fuck what these guys go on to do in the NBA. Brockman is a better college player.

    No he's not. Brockman is a better rebounder. That's it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    FREE PUB!!!

    I have always been much more critical of NWG than Upshaw. I maintain that I'd rather have Brockman, mostly because I don't give a fuck what these guys go on to do in the NBA. Brockman is a better college player.

    No he's not. Brockman is a better rebounder. That's it.
    Brockman is better at everything except for blocking shots. You can't even argue otherwise.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    FREE PUB!!!

    I have always been much more critical of NWG than Upshaw. I maintain that I'd rather have Brockman, mostly because I don't give a fuck what these guys go on to do in the NBA. Brockman is a better college player.

    No he's not. Brockman is a better rebounder. That's it.
    Brockman is better at everything except for blocking shots. You can't even argue otherwise.
    Free throws. Brockman had a more advanced offensive game, but Upshaw is a much better finisher around the rim.

    And the shot blocking is a pretty big deal. Upshaw changes games defensively. Brockman was a pretty limited defender although he was a good team defender. I don't think it's even close to who is/was better.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    FREE PUB!!!

    I have always been much more critical of NWG than Upshaw. I maintain that I'd rather have Brockman, mostly because I don't give a fuck what these guys go on to do in the NBA. Brockman is a better college player.

    No he's not. Brockman is a better rebounder. That's it.
    Brockman is better at everything except for blocking shots. You can't even argue otherwise.
    Free throws. Brockman had a more advanced offensive game, but Upshaw is a much better finisher around the rim.

    And the shot blocking is a pretty big deal. Upshaw changes games defensively. Brockman was a pretty limited defender although he was a good team defender. I don't think it's even close to who is/was better.
    FT % : Brockman = 61.2%, Upshaw = 44.2%...so, what's your point?
    FG% : Brockman = 53.4%, Upshaw = 50.6%...and Brockman took more outside shots that Upshaw doesn't even have in his arsenal. Again, what's your point?

    Brockman scored more points, and pulled down more rebounds (which are more valuable than a blocked shot). Upshaw is his prison bitch.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    FREE PUB!!!

    I have always been much more critical of NWG than Upshaw. I maintain that I'd rather have Brockman, mostly because I don't give a fuck what these guys go on to do in the NBA. Brockman is a better college player.

    No he's not. Brockman is a better rebounder. That's it.
    Brockman is better at everything except for blocking shots. You can't even argue otherwise.
    Free throws. Brockman had a more advanced offensive game, but Upshaw is a much better finisher around the rim.

    And the shot blocking is a pretty big deal. Upshaw changes games defensively. Brockman was a pretty limited defender although he was a good team defender. I don't think it's even close to who is/was better.
    FT % : Brockman = 61.2%, Upshaw = 44.2%...so, what's your point?
    FG% : Brockman = 53.4%, Upshaw = 50.6%...and Brockman took more outside shots that Upshaw doesn't even have in his arsenal. Again, what's your point?

    Brockman scored more points, and pulled down more rebounds (which are more valuable than a blocked shot). Upshaw is his prison bitch.
    Just stop.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,789
    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    FREE PUB!!!

    I have always been much more critical of NWG than Upshaw. I maintain that I'd rather have Brockman, mostly because I don't give a fuck what these guys go on to do in the NBA. Brockman is a better college player.

    No he's not. Brockman is a better rebounder. That's it.
    Brockman is better at everything except for blocking shots. You can't even argue otherwise.
    Free throws. Brockman had a more advanced offensive game, but Upshaw is a much better finisher around the rim.

    And the shot blocking is a pretty big deal. Upshaw changes games defensively. Brockman was a pretty limited defender although he was a good team defender. I don't think it's even close to who is/was better.
    FT % : Brockman = 61.2%, Upshaw = 44.2%...so, what's your point?
    FG% : Brockman = 53.4%, Upshaw = 50.6%...and Brockman took more outside shots that Upshaw doesn't even have in his arsenal. Again, what's your point?

    Brockman scored more points, and pulled down more rebounds (which are more valuable than a blocked shot). Upshaw is his prison bitch.
    I was with you until this.

    W. JW.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Upshaw is getting 12 and 10 with 4.5 blocks since PAC 12 play began. He has more blocks alone than any other PAC 12 team. I love Brockman and I liked Hawes, but it's come on.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    dnc said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    FREE PUB!!!

    I have always been much more critical of NWG than Upshaw. I maintain that I'd rather have Brockman, mostly because I don't give a fuck what these guys go on to do in the NBA. Brockman is a better college player.

    No he's not. Brockman is a better rebounder. That's it.
    Brockman is better at everything except for blocking shots. You can't even argue otherwise.
    Free throws. Brockman had a more advanced offensive game, but Upshaw is a much better finisher around the rim.

    And the shot blocking is a pretty big deal. Upshaw changes games defensively. Brockman was a pretty limited defender although he was a good team defender. I don't think it's even close to who is/was better.
    FT % : Brockman = 61.2%, Upshaw = 44.2%...so, what's your point?
    FG% : Brockman = 53.4%, Upshaw = 50.6%...and Brockman took more outside shots that Upshaw doesn't even have in his arsenal. Again, what's your point?

    Brockman scored more points, and pulled down more rebounds (which are more valuable than a blocked shot). Upshaw is his prison bitch.
    I was with you until this.

    W. JW.

    A defensive rebound is a stop, a sure thing. A block ends up in the stands or up in the air for a 50/50 jump ball more often than not.

    How is this even a debate?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    FREE PUB!!!

    I have always been much more critical of NWG than Upshaw. I maintain that I'd rather have Brockman, mostly because I don't give a fuck what these guys go on to do in the NBA. Brockman is a better college player.

    No he's not. Brockman is a better rebounder. That's it.
    Brockman is better at everything except for blocking shots. You can't even argue otherwise.
    Free throws. Brockman had a more advanced offensive game, but Upshaw is a much better finisher around the rim.

    And the shot blocking is a pretty big deal. Upshaw changes games defensively. Brockman was a pretty limited defender although he was a good team defender. I don't think it's even close to who is/was better.
    FT % : Brockman = 61.2%, Upshaw = 44.2%...so, what's your point?
    FG% : Brockman = 53.4%, Upshaw = 50.6%...and Brockman took more outside shots that Upshaw doesn't even have in his arsenal. Again, what's your point?

    Brockman scored more points, and pulled down more rebounds (which are more valuable than a blocked shot). Upshaw is his prison bitch.
    Just stop.
    Stop making shit up and I will.

    You are out of your fucking element here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    PLSS triple post, bitchez!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited January 2015
    You were growing on me Fremont, but you've gone full fucktard in this thread.

    A rim protecting, shot altering 7 footer is more valuable than a 6'7" rebounder. Upshaw is averaging 10 boards himself in PAC 12 play and over 8 in 25 minutes for the season.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,885 Founders Club
    But do noses get broken when Upshaw plays? That's what I thought
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    RoadDawg55 said:

    You were growing on me Fremont, but you've gone full fucktard in this thread.

    A rim protecting, shot altering 7 footer is more valuable than a 6'7" rebounder. Upshaw is averaging 10 boards himself in PAC 12 play and over 8 in 25 minutes for the season.

    That 6'7" rebounder is also better at everything else EXCEPT for blocking shots.

    Fuck off with your 7 game sample size.

    When's your next date with Cyler?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    You were growing on me Fremont, but you've gone full fucktard in this thread.

    A rim protecting, shot altering 7 footer is more valuable than a 6'7" rebounder. Upshaw is averaging 10 boards himself in PAC 12 play and over 8 in 25 minutes for the season.

    That 6'7" rebounder is also better at everything else EXCEPT for blocking shots.

    Fuck off with your 7 game sample size.

    When's your next date with Cyler?
    Upshaw is better. Easy call.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    RoadDawg55 said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    You were growing on me Fremont, but you've gone full fucktard in this thread.

    A rim protecting, shot altering 7 footer is more valuable than a 6'7" rebounder. Upshaw is averaging 10 boards himself in PAC 12 play and over 8 in 25 minutes for the season.

    That 6'7" rebounder is also better at everything else EXCEPT for blocking shots.

    Fuck off with your 7 game sample size.

    When's your next date with Cyler?
    Upshaw is better. Easy call.
    Disagree.

    Check the facts.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.