Comment on the Re-Rank of Recent Classes...

HeretoBeatmyChest

Its amazing how many 0 or 1's there were for me. Sark's classes were littered with guys who didn't do shit, flamed out, etc.

Swaye

#tosh#massacre#sizzle

bananasnblondes

It would be interesting to have one of the quooks on this bored do the same thing for Oregon's recruits over the same timespan

MrsPetersen

yup, when we started working on this spreadsheet last year around this time it was like holy shit, this is why we still suck.

and the numbers kept on adding up again this year.

Doogles

I know those classes had a huge list of who? But it would be curious to compare it to a lot of other programs because that might just be the natural case. I mean there are 85 schollies and 22 starting spots (24 with special teams), a lot of guys are destined to be scout team Who?s

Again, I think Sark's list is probably higher than most, but I bet most programs are full of 1s and 0s

CokeGreaterThanPepsi

bananasnblondes said:

It would be interesting to have one of the quooks on this bored do the same thing for Oregon's recruits over the same timespan

I was gonna ask @AZDuck‌ if he knew enough ppl that might be willing to do it. I'd love to see their results

HeretoBeatmyChest

Maybe find some Stanford & Boise St fans who'd also be willing to do theirs. That would give us a good basket of comparable programs. Because if Pete is going to be successful, I'd bet we look similar to Stanford, though not entirely.

I was pretty liberal with giving out high ranks too. I think if anyone is an All American or close to it, its a 5* while All-conference or very close is a 4*. 3's for me are guys like Micah Hatchie, Andrew Hudson, Greg Ducre, Kevin Smith...guys who are solid starters.

claycha

Not sure about the rest of you, but I had more fingers to count with when I #Finish ed

chuck

Doogles said:

I know those classes had a huge list of who? But it would be curious to compare it to a lot of other programs because that might just be the natural case. I mean there are 85 schollies and 22 starting spots (24 with special teams), a lot of guys are destined to be scout team Who?s

Again, I think Sark's list is probably higher than most, but I bet most programs are full of 1s and 0s

Yes, they probably would be, however most of those 0s and 1s would be invisible or transferring because they are behind good players. The classes we just ranked are full of total flameouts or career bench ornaments who were, in many cases, behind players that ranged from bad to mediocre. I think that if we look at who got ranked 2-3* on average and how much we relied on them it will be nearly as damning as the number of 0s and 1s.

BayDawg

Doogles said:

I know those classes had a huge list of who? But it would be curious to compare it to a lot of other programs because that might just be the natural case. I mean there are 85 schollies and 22 starting spots (24 with special teams), a lot of guys are destined to be scout team Who?s

Again, I think Sark's list is probably higher than most, but I bet most programs are full of 1s and 0s

This is true, but the good programs also have a bunch of 4's and 5's.

Sadly, We do not.

HuskyJW

Everybody gets a 0 if you're a Duck.

Next man up....doesn't matter who you are. It's the system not the players.

whatshouldicareabout

I'd say it'd be interesting for Wazzu fans to do the same thing, but they'd rate everyone a 4 or a 5 when in reality everyone is a 1 or a 0.