ESPN: USC should follow Ohio State's blueprint on how to return to top
Comments
-
Yeah they should follow this shit: get lucky that their 3rd string fucking QB was the best QB on their team. And fuck USC. If you are a fan of any other PAC 12 team and you want USC to return to the top, you need to die.
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Yeah they should follow this shit:
get lucky that their 3rd string fucking QB was the best QB on their teamuse their RBs and OL to run over Oregon. -
We need USC back to win the conference some championships. UW coming back can help, too. I don't see any other programs that have what it takes to compete on the national stage.oregonblitzkrieg said:Yeah they should follow this shit: get lucky that their 3rd string fucking QB was the best QB on their team. And fuck USC. If you are a fan of any other PAC 12 team and you want USC to return to the top, you need to die.
#BacThePac -
Edited for the part that deserved an upvoteoregonblitzkrieg said:Yeah they should follow this shit: get lucky that their 3rd string fucking QB was the best QB on their team.And fuck USC. If you are a fan of any other PAC 12 team and you want USC to return to the top, you need to die. -
Quooks gonna quook. Blaming a 3rd string QB for having a +4 turnover ratio and losing by 22 lol.oregonblitzkrieg said:Yeah they should follow this shit: get lucky that their 3rd string fucking QB was the best QB on their team. And fuck USC. If you are a fan of any other PAC 12 team and you want USC to return to the top, you need to die.
-
fixedoregonblitzkrieg said:If you are a fan of any PAC 12 team and you want any other Pac 12 to return to the top, you need to die.
-
oregonblitzkrieg said:
Yeah they should follow this shit: get lucky that their 3rd string fucking QB was the best QB on their team. And fuck
USCOregon. If you are a fan of any other PAC 12 team and you wantUSCOregon to return to the top, you need to die. -
Agreed.BallSacked said:I think Sark survives anything above 7-5, but if he wins less than 9 I think he'll be under a lot of pressure to make some changes (give up playcalling, fire Wilcox) and win big in 2016.
Then in 2016 he'll have a new QB and a schedule that includes: Alabama, ND, Oregon, @UW, @UCLA, @Stanford. Profiles in Courage: he'll be fired at some point before the bowl game in 2016.
From what I follow Sark is going to crush recruiting this year, he probably will finish with a class rated above Alabama on signing day. That class will either save his fat ass with 8/9 win mediocrity or, more likely, leave a fully stacked roster for a real coach
8-9 wins and he'll be in the hot seat in year 3. With that schedule and his coaching ability, its highly unlikely they get to 10 win. Wouldn't it be great if Sark just goes 9-4, 9-4, 9-4 and never matches Orgeron. -
Ohio st giving USC advice?
Section8, maybe if USC just had Timu at middle backer they'd be on top.section8 said:LOL at the comments. "Sark is not cocky" "..has more knowledge of the game"
w,jw
Rodney Strong
USC with more depth next season will be a team that will be in the CFP. The difference from Kiffen to Sark is that Sark is not Cocky and been a head coach longer than kiffen has been and have more knowledge of the game than Kiffen. USC has had the issues of having less numbers than most of the college football FBS teams, ontop of that USC has not had a big physical practice since the 2011 season, and those that know and play football know that you cannot be successful when you are not practice the pace of the game. But this season USC will be able to and will be able to add more depth and star power. It will be good on good instead of good on walk-on or 3rd String -
USC fans aren't very happy with Wilcox. Wonder if Sark will hire a new DC for 2016 and use that as an excuse for getting destroyed by everyone.









