Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Peterman - worst power 5 coach

245

Comments

  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    According to that matrix, Mike Leach is the 10th best coach in the country.

    I can't stop laughing.

    I guess the developer doesn't watch the red-zone channel
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,426 Founders Club
    RoadDawg55 said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    All this study does is take into account recruiting rankings of the teams. UW outrecruited 4 teams over the previous 4 years that they lost to this season, therefore the -4 Coach Effect.

    That is surprising actually. I thought Oregon, Stanford, and UCLA had all recruited better?
    They did.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    Oh fer fuck sakes here we go. In 3-4 more years he'll be the best so fuck you punto

    l-o-l
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    I messed up, CFBmatrix was doogin big time based off of only their numbers... Coach Effect is based on loosing games you were predicted to win, based on talent and field advantage combined. Here is what they said prior to the season about UW:

    "They have a higher talent ranking than ten of the teams on their schedule for a talent only baseline record of 10-3. Adjust up 2 games for home wins versus Stanford and UCLA and the record is 12-1. Down -1 games for a new head coach and have 11-2 with my favorite middle number at 10.5."

    So the -4 comes from loosing to Stanford, ASU, UCLA and Arizona.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    I messed up, CFBmatrix was doogin big time based off of only their numbers... Coach Effect is based on loosing games you were predicted to win, based on talent and field advantage combined. Here is what they said prior to the season about UW:

    "They have a higher talent ranking than ten of the teams on their schedule for a talent only baseline record of 10-3. Adjust up 2 games for home wins versus Stanford and UCLA and the record is 12-1. Down -1 games for a new head coach and have 11-2 with my favorite middle number at 10.5."

    So the -4 comes from loosing to Stanford, ASU, UCLA and Arizona.

    And really it's -2.5 off of his own prediction.

    Still bad. But not worst in the nation.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    Here was his preseason preview:

    cfbmatrix.com/20-washington-huskies-preview-2014/
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,491 Standard Supporter
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    According to that matrix, Mike Leach is the 10th best coach in the country.

    I can't stop laughing.

    That is so FUCKINGLY STUPID, I can't even abbreviate FUCKINGLY STUPID.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Canard
    Canard Member Posts: 504
    Any analysis that looks at 3 star Mariota as lower on paper than four star miley is fucktarded.

    That's the only way this guy is doing a "talent analysis," by dry star counting.

    Anyone with even one functional eyeball on Miley the season before he was named starter knew that the young noodle arm who had the throwing motion and slow delivery of a trebuchet, but without the zip and range, was taking you nowhere good, or certainly not to 10+/- 1 wins.

    Well, at least I was laughing at the sweatpants boners around here. You'll have to acquit yourself if you were in the Great Purple Circle Jerk of 2014.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter