Agree Sark wins more games this season than Pete, not that that is a good thing. Disagree on your softy stance with Cyler, KJ will start the opener or i'm burning husky stadium down while we get plungered by the potato farmers.
We'll get a better idea in Spring. None of you guys have any clue about KJ. The only thought is, "well Miles sucks, so KJ has to be better." Lindquist and Williams were more touted than KJCS out of high school and that wasn't the case.
Yeah but, after a year of fighting off cancer, how bad does one of the other diseases appear?
Which games would Sark hypothetically win even though he doesn't do hypotheticals? The two games most posters are bent about are Stanford and Arizona which were close losses late. That isn't exactly an area in which Sark excelled either. He was a missed chip shot away from losing to Arizona with USC talent. And his game against Stanford was as ugly as ours. He never beat ASU so that wasn't going to happen. He'd still have Miles so I don't think he beats anyone that was favored, same as Petersen
Which games would Sark hypothetically win even though he doesn't do hypotheticals? The two games most posters are bent about are Stanford and Arizona which were close losses late. That isn't exactly an area in which Sark excelled either. He was a missed chip shot away from losing to Arizona with USC talent. And his game against Stanford was as ugly as ours. He never beat ASU so that wasn't going to happen. He'd still have Miles so I don't think he beats anyone that was favored, same as Petersen
I doubt our offense would be that bad under sark. We probably beat asu and stanford and inexplicably get blown out on the road to cal.
Comments
Cycler is who we think he is.
I deal with hypotheticals.