An illuminating post about overpaid, underachiever Jim Harbog (stolen from a USC site)
Comments
-
I didn't realize Sark went 12-1 with a BCS Bowl win in his fourth year.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Here's some more perspective. Steve Sarkisian took over a UW program that was Owen 12.DerekJohnson said:TL; DR
But here's some perspective:
Shaw, Kelly and Helfrich took over programs that were winners. Harbaugh took over a Stanford team that was 1-11. -
If Harbaugh was still at Stanford he would be shitting all over the PAC12, cook it.
-
CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
If Harbaugh was still at Stanford he would be shitting all over himself while Oregon continued to own him, cook it.
-
UW's 0-12 > Stanford's 1-11 talent wise and it isn't close. What Jim did was incredible at stanford. He talked shit in year 1 to pete carroll in the thick of his dynasty and won as a 40+ point underdog in LA. 3 NFC title games after not sniffing the playoffs for 8 years speaks for itself.
He is a phenomenal coach no matter how you slice it. -
Your eyes really aren't as good as @GrandpaSankey 's.oregonblitzkrieg said:
29-21. It's a trajectory that could have wound up at 44-36-1. But we'll never know.Meek said:apparently Ty set it all up for Harbaugh to not only succeed in college, but to get to the Super Bowl....makes you almost wonder....why isn't Ty coaching anymore? Nah, he'd rather golf.
Apparently you guys don't knowthe damagethe extent to which Ty and Buddy Teevens set the program up for Harbaugh.
Extra poonts for misspelling coronation and perpetuating that fallacy of crediting David Shaw for the two conference championships. -
You are a fucking moron if you think Harbaughs tenure at Stanford and 49ers was simply spin.
He built a program that went from 1-11 to blowing out Pete Carroll to having your duck players crying in the third quarter last year.
HTH. -
It wasn't my poast. But last time I checked, David Shaw was the coach that won them (1 of them vs Chip Kelly), not Jim Harbaugh.doogsinparadise said:
Your eyes really aren't as good as @GrandpaSankey 's.oregonblitzkrieg said:
29-21. It's a trajectory that could have wound up at 44-36-1. But we'll never know.Meek said:apparently Ty set it all up for Harbaugh to not only succeed in college, but to get to the Super Bowl....makes you almost wonder....why isn't Ty coaching anymore? Nah, he'd rather golf.
Apparently you guys don't knowthe damagethe extent to which Ty and Buddy Teevens set the program up for Harbaugh.
Extra poonts for misspelling coronation and perpetuating that fallacy of crediting David Shaw for the two conference championships. -
Who gives a shit. Win a college conference championship and then pop off.Doogles said:UW's 0-12 > Stanford's 1-11 talent wise and it isn't close. What Jim did was incredible at stanford. He talked shit in year 1 to pete carroll in the thick of his dynasty and won as a 40+ point underdog in LA. 3 NFC title games after not sniffing the playoffs for 8 years speaks for itself.
-
David Shaw had the ducks crying last year, not Harbaugh. And Chip Kelly beat FSU. They can both be credited for building something, but cannot be credited with the wins on the field several years later.BallSacked said:You are a fucking moron if you think Harbaughs tenure at Stanford and 49ers was simply spin.
He built a program that went from 1-11 to blowing out Pete Carroll to having your duck players crying in the third quarter last year.
HTH. -
The Friday sacrifice should be expedited this week.






