Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sark doesn't watch Seahawk Games

2

Comments

  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    IMALOSER_ said:

    The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

    That's right......he was following the script.

    The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

    I point it out........and I'm the problem.

    Because no one pays that close of attention to preseason games and the overall in season trend is well established.

    The Seahawks run to set up the pass. They are a smashmouth team.

    You can't refute any of this.
  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    If you are going to bitch, bitch about the right things:

    --Offensive line depth is still shit after 5 years
    --cannot protect the QB
    --cannot defend the spread
    --S/T
    --penalties
    --game management by head coach

    In our freakin' bowl game we ran the ball 38 times, including 8 of our 1st 13 plays and still lost. And overall we had close to a 50-50 mix for the year.

    But when your QB is sacked 37 times, that takes away even more run plays.

    Run/pass mix is way down on the list of things that NEED to be fixed this year.
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186

    If you are going to bitch, bitch about the right things:

    --Offensive line depth is still shit after 5 years
    --cannot protect the QB
    --cannot defend the spread
    --S/T
    --penalties
    --game management by head coach

    In our freakin' bowl game we ran the ball 38 times, including 8 of our 1st 13 plays and still lost. And overall we had close to a 50-50 mix for the year.

    But when your QB is sacked 37 times, that takes away even more run plays.

    Run/pass mix is way down on the list of things that NEED to be fixed this year.

    Special Teams is a mixed bag

  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754

    If you are going to bitch, bitch about the right things:

    --Offensive line depth is still shit after 5 years
    --cannot protect the QB
    --cannot defend the spread
    --S/T
    --penalties
    --game management by head coach

    In our freakin' bowl game we ran the ball 38 times, including 8 of our 1st 13 plays and still lost. And overall we had close to a 50-50 mix for the year.

    But when your QB is sacked 37 times, that takes away even more run plays.

    Run/pass mix is way down on the list of things that NEED to be fixed this year.

    Special Teams is a mixed bag

    Travis Coons & Shane Williams-Rhodes disagree.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,998 Founders Club
    When your QB is sacked 37 times it counts as 37 runs in your bogus 50-50 stat
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,998 Founders Club
    But he doesn't love the worst best play caller in America
  • Steve_BowmanSteve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    edited August 2013
    No fringin kidding. What the hell does a pre-season game have to do with anything?

    Drawing conclusions from this is worthless

    The question is who the fuck would chart a preseason game?

  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754

    When your QB is sacked 37 times it counts as 37 runs in your bogus 50-50 stat

    466 run plays

    438 pass plays

    So back out those 37 sacks, and you get real close to the 50-50 "bogus" stat. HTH

    How many times do I need to tell you, leave the football talk to the big boys.

    :))
  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    edited August 2013

    But he doesn't love the worst best play caller in America

    I hope the state is giving you some type of assistance to help you function in society.

    You are really slow.

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,998 Founders Club
    Stats are for losers. HTH
  • IMALOSER_IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158

    No fringin kidding. What the hell does a pre-season game have to do with anything?

    Drawing conclusions from this is worthless

    The question is who the fuck would chart a preseason game?

    Maybe you two should take that up with the original poster that thought our Head Coach could learn something from it. No one seemed to have a problem with him using pre-season games when it fit the script.
  • IMALOSER_IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158

    IMALOSER_ said:

    The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

    That's right......he was following the script.

    The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

    I point it out........and I'm the problem.

    Because no one pays that close of attention to preseason games and the overall in season trend is well established.

    The Seahawks run to set up the pass. They are a smashmouth team.

    You can't refute any of this.
    Well Established?

    Like in the Playoffs with your season on the line?

    Seahawks vs. Atlanta - 1st Half

    Falcons - 20
    Seahawks -0

    Seahawk Passing Plays - 20
    Seahawk Running Plays - 11


    That sure is a well established game plan. Maybe they should try using it next time their season is on the line.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,943 Founders Club

    Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).

    T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.

    It's the same guy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.
  • [Deleted User][Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).

    T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.

    It's the same guy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.
    I know it's the same fucktard and he'll create even more handles to pollute this place.

    When Derek said Harv made dawgboard a cest pool I laughed. Guys like IrishDoog/IMALOSER/Factchecker ruined the board.
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,551 Founders Club

    Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).

    T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.

    It's the same guy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.
    I know it's the same fucktard and he'll create even more handles to pollute this place.

    When Derek said Harv made dawgboard a cest pool I laughed. Guys like IrishDoog/IMALOSER/Factchecker ruined the board.
    You obviously weren't looking closely enough at how he trolled said posters
  • HillsboroDuckHillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    IMALOSER_ said:

    IMALOSER_ said:

    The question you should be asking is why not one person called the original poster out for making a statement that was totally false?

    That's right......he was following the script.

    The best part of the thread was that he was hyping up the Hawks for starting a game just like UW does. Yet, not one of you called him out.

    I point it out........and I'm the problem.

    Because no one pays that close of attention to preseason games and the overall in season trend is well established.

    The Seahawks run to set up the pass. They are a smashmouth team.

    You can't refute any of this.
    Well Established?

    Like in the Playoffs with your season on the line?

    Seahawks vs. Atlanta - 1st Half

    Falcons - 20
    Seahawks -0

    Seahawk Passing Plays - 20
    Seahawk Running Plays - 11


    That sure is a well established game plan. Maybe they should try using it next time their season is on the line.
    I like to cherry pick one game from a season of 18 and pretend that proves something. I like to do that.

  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754

    Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).

    T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.

    It's the same guy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.
    Sorry Sherlock.
  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754

    Thoughts and prayers go out to HardcoreHusky (RIP).

    T's and P's to HardcoreHusky. I don't know if this board can survive both IrishDoog and IMALOSER.

    It's the same guy. I'm not sure if that makes it better or worse.
    I know it's the same fucktard and he'll create even more handles to pollute this place.

    When Derek said Harv made dawgboard a cest pool I laughed. Guys like IrishDoog/IMALOSER/Factchecker ruined the board.

    Wow, you really are slow.

    If a guy who does not march along like a zombie and actually uses facts/stats to back up his arguments ruins this board, the I am your man.

    Like others you hate the fact that I am not a full Doog or Noog, and can actually think for myself.

    You should try it sometime.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited August 2013
    good teams adjust their game plans, if a team is loading the box of course u pass, the thing with sark is he ditches the run at random
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited August 2013
    And it is well established because u have to look to find a game where they didn't pound the rock
Sign In or Register to comment.