Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Off season

2»

Comments

  • DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,626 Founders Club
    I'm curious to see what happens with us and Texas. They had a horrendous first year under charlie strong with a similar purge and culture shift from hang loose to nut the fuck up. The only thing left to hold our hat on is big time programs that always have talent like bama and SC had shit records their first year under hall of fame coaches.

    That's all we got left.
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,234 Standard Supporter

    Hopefully this was the rough transition year we had to suffer through. I actually do believe that. If it's not, there's no hope.

    I might buy that if we didn't see so many red flags with the roster next season. Offensive line was neglected for years in recruiting before Petersen got here and may look worse next year.

    I am fine with the potential starters next year on the defensive line but given who we are losing how do we not see that as a big drop off?

    I see another sub 500 conference record. Barring a miraculous improvement in the offense.


  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    topdawgnc said:

    I have to believe this was a transition year.

    Washington had the second most rushing yards in the PAC, right behind ... Oregon. 4th in YPA with 4.4.

    The Hippie Stoner looking for pot at the state fair only threw three interceptions.

    The real problem was the passing game.

    There was no offensive identity because there was no offensive motor. Peterman worked to protect the ball and hope his defense would win the day. Against shitty teams it worked ... against good teams ... not so much.

    Summed up ...

    If you are going to rate a team on wins and losses ... you're a fucktard.

    Wins and losses aren't important? Wtf man. How else do you judge a team?
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838

    topdawgnc said:

    I have to believe this was a transition year.

    Washington had the second most rushing yards in the PAC, right behind ... Oregon. 4th in YPA with 4.4.

    The Hippie Stoner looking for pot at the state fair only threw three interceptions.

    The real problem was the passing game.

    There was no offensive identity because there was no offensive motor. Peterman worked to protect the ball and hope his defense would win the day. Against shitty teams it worked ... against good teams ... not so much.

    Summed up ...

    If you are going to rate a team on wins and losses ... you're a fucktard.

    Wins and losses aren't important? Wtf man. How else do you judge a team?
    Call @IrishDawg22‌ he has the place dialed in.

    Then call @TierbsHsotBoobs‌ as the official historian.
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    brchco12 said:

    I think the D absolutely hates the offense, you could sense them quitting after the first 5 million 3 and outs.

    Hire a real OC, make Jsmith your QB coach if you need continuity. The fact we have a TE coach and no QB coach is baffling.

    Tight End U is BACK BABY!
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,234 Standard Supporter
    brchco12 said:

    I think the D absolutely hates the offense, you could sense them quitting after the first 5 million 3 and outs.

    Hire a real OC, make Jsmith your QB coach if you need continuity. The fact we have a TE coach and no QB coach is baffling.

    We rarely use tight ends. I don't know why we have a coach for that position. I would prefer a coach for the safeties myself.
  • BallSackedBallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    edited January 2015
    Doogles said:

    I'm curious to see what happens with us and Texas. They had a horrendous first year under charlie strong with a similar purge and culture shift from hang loose to nut the fuck up. The only thing left to hold our hat on is big time programs that always have talent like bama and SC had shit records their first year under hall of fame coaches.

    That's all we got left.

    Very similar first years. Punchless offense, talented defense, new coaches with similar temperaments, and titanic sized QB problems. Having seen both teams I think Doogs > Hoorns in 2014.

    Texas OL was dreck because Strong kicked everyone out preseason, they all return and should be better. How will UWs OL be in 2015? Seems like a major hurdle to clear.

    Also Texas redshirted the #2 QB in 2014 TBS rankings, UW redshirted a less esteemed prospect. Rankings be damned but you would think they are better positioned to get away from their QB retard than UW.

    Also one team will likely have Chris Warren. Either way, it'll be interesting.
  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,735
    Maybe it's just Doogin' but I fail to see how this years starters Atoe...for example Is better than next years players with more experience under This new staff.
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,234 Standard Supporter

    Maybe it's just Doogin' but I fail to see how this years starters Atoe...for example Is better than next years players with more experience under This new staff.

    Well atoe wasn't that good. If it was close I think you would have seen the younger guys rotate through. They didn't. So I am assuming they are not very good.

    Watching miles, you know he sucks. So people assumed Williams couldn't be worse. Until he was.
Sign In or Register to comment.