Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Yesterday was proof the BCS was a fraud
If the BCS was still around does anyone think the championship game wouldn't have been an undefeated FSU vs a 1 loss 'Bama team? ESPN pushed that sham of a system for WAY too long.
4 ·
Comments
ESPN wants eyeballs. The whole ESPN SEC thing is fucking stupid.
Larry Scott chose a third rate partner and isn't on major providers. That isn't the SEC's fault.
Yesterday was just proof that the current fraud is a little better than the former fraud.
Take the champs of the Pac 12, B1G, SEC!!!, and Big 12, and 4 at large teams.
Of course, the SEC has nine playoff titles while everyone else combined will have 8 after the 12th.
http://www.collegefootballpoll.com/2004_archive_bcs.html
Sorry...2-5
You don't get to invalidate a decade of championships because of one 42-35 playoff game.
The SEC was down this year. That's the only thing last night proved. Of course we knew that long before the game was played.
The pro sports teams are East Coast and LA centric and that's where the focus is. College Football is different.
The SEC as we know it came about in 92. The BCS in 96. Saying the SEC didn't win before the BCS is not correct to begin with and disingenuous since the SEC expanding and having a championship game is what got them TV money galore first and made them the force they are.
Bama has always won titles including one in 92 under Stallings.
The PAC 12 has chosen to be the Conference of Champions in sports no one gives a shit about on a back water network you can't get. Deal with it
The PAC 12 should be far and away the best football conference but they aren't. Because the SEC is smarter and the PAC 12 is a bunch of Emmerts and Turners other than Oregon who shows what trying can do
The country thinks only USC can win a natty out here because so far that's true. Oregon may join Washington in getting one but perception won't change over night