FREE PUB!

TierbsHsotBoobs

Not a problem for me, but someone found this today:

MikeDamone

So you're trying to get us to believe that your not hanging out at the library surfing porn?

TierbsHsotBoobs

It's 2013. I surf porn on my phone/tablet.

TheKobeStopper

Using the library Internet. Sounds like a real winner.

TierbsHsotBoobs

TheKobeStopper said:

Using the library Internet. Sounds like a real winner.

Allegedly the same guy who posted that is a triple DUI guy as well.


Allegedly.

TheKobeStopper

I'd still be more embarrassed about using the library computers.

RaceBannon

TheKobeStopper said:

I'd still be more embarrassed about using the library computers.

That's elitist

BennyBeaver

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Not a problem for me, but someone found this today:

DerekJohnson

Well that's no good.

TheKobeStopper

DerekJohnson said:

Well that's no good.

I don't know how those porn blocker programs work but could it just be because of the word "hardcore"? I would imagine the libraries have the strictest policy possible on that.

DerekJohnson

TheKobeStopper said:

DerekJohnson said:

Well that's no good.

I don't know how those porn blocker programs work but could it just be because of the word "hardcore"? I would imagine the libraries have the strictest policy possible on that.

Yes, I would think so too -- and understandably so.

BennyBeaver

TheGlove said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Not a problem for me, but someone found this today:

Hi Hood Canal Harv!

DeepSeaZ

Does this mean we are getting a porn board?

DerekJohnson

If we had gone with "DilettanteHusky.com" or "MediocreHusky.com" we probably slip past the library sensors/censors.

[Deleted User]

DerekJohnson said:

If we had gone with "DilettanteHusky.com" or "MediocreHusky.com" we probably slip past the library sensors/censors.

Be a very fitting title given the current state of Husky football.

Maybe the library isn't a fan of the HHHoTW? Prudes perhaps?

DeepSeaZ

a lot of companies are now using 3rd party internet content filter that reviews sites and places them in categories. Companies can go in and choose which categories to allow and not to allow. Anyway, a site can be categorized incorrectly if the provider uses one server (IP) to host multiple sites. So if Hardcore Husky shares the same IP as Hardcore Honeys (dibs on name for site) than HH is hosed until the site moves to a different IP.

DerekJohnson said:

If we had gone with "DilettanteHusky.com" or "MediocreHusky.com" we probably slip past the library sensors/censors.

DerekJohnson

DeepSeaZ said:

a lot of companies are now using 3rd party internet content filter that reviews sites and places them in categories. Companies can go in and choose which categories to allow and not to allow. Anyway, a site can be categorized incorrectly if the provider uses one server (IP) to host multiple sites. So if Hardcore Husky shares the same IP as Hardcore Honeys (dibs on name for site) than HH is hosed until the site moves to a different IP.

DerekJohnson said:

If we had gone with "DilettanteHusky.com" or "MediocreHusky.com" we probably slip past the library sensors/censors.

thx

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

DeepSeaZ said:

a lot of companies are now using 3rd party internet content filter that reviews sites and places them in categories. Companies can go in and choose which categories to allow and not to allow. Anyway, a site can be categorized incorrectly if the provider uses one server (IP) to host multiple sites. So if Hardcore Husky shares the same IP as Hardcore Honeys (dibs on name for site) than HH is hosed until the site moves to a different IP.

DerekJohnson said:

If we had gone with "DilettanteHusky.com" or "MediocreHusky.com" we probably slip past the library sensors/censors.

Already taken.