Coach Pete Yr 1 Summary

claycha

Def would have been the year the AD office got picketed to fire that fat fuck Sark (redundant) 2013 was the year I discovered the FireCoachSark web. Thank Sweet Baby Jesus he moved on.

RaccoonHarry

dnc said:

whatshouldicareabout said:

Tequilla said:

In hindsight ...

We expected the defensive front 7 to be good - it was.

We were scared shitless about the secondary - it turned out to be better than we expected.

We were worried about our receiving options and Kasen's health - it was warranted.

We expected that we'd find a relatively seemless transition from Sankey to the next RB in line - it took longer than we anticipated.

We expected that the OL would be the strength of the offense - it was wildy inconsistent for much of the year.

We expected Cyler to be able to step in and perform at an average or better level in this conference (comparable to the 5-4 records that Keith Price would put up) - turned out that him missing Spring Practice hurt him far more than anticipated as the play for most of the year was uneven at best and terrible at worst.

Is that disappointing. On one hand, yes. On the other hand, the improvement in many key aspects of this team from the start of the season until the end was refreshing and if it continues into the future, then it's very probable that Petersen is the right guy for the job.

What? Who said that?

We returned the same OL gave up 36 sacks last year, and they were changing their scheme from zone-block to man-block.

Who actually thought the OL would be a strength this year after sucking the past 13 years?

Some thought they were ready to rumble.

Ossai. Enough said about that.

sarktastic

The biggest disappointment was learning how gaping the talent deficiency was in certain key positions due to poor recruiting and development of earlier classes.

TierbsHsotBoobs

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

Ted Miller is a fucking egghead.

Says the guy who loves SRS.

TierbsHsotBoobs

4-5 > 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4

MikeDamone

bananasnblondes said:

The encouraging thing for me is that for the first time in over a decade, there was only 1 game where we were truly plungered - and that was against a team who will probably win the national championship. In the UCLA game, we spotted them 14 points right away and then played them even the rest of the way.

While I'm not happy with 8 wins, I'm going to give Peterman the benefit of the doubt in his first year. He has already proven the fucktards wrong about "not being able to recruit with the big boys" and, though he would never say it himself (even though he kind of did), there's a very good chance that the team he took over was a dumpster fire from a culture and coaching standpoint. Quite simply, you're not going to win the conference with a secondary full of true freshmen, one of the worst qbs in the league, and a pedestrian 3-man platoon at running back.

UW played Alabama?

IrishDawg22

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

4-5 > 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4 > 5-4

I guess the proves...