Sark never had 3 first team All Americans in 5 years

sarktastic

Peterman gets 3 right out of the shoot.

Doogles

Sark's guys, Kikaha would have won the heisman if Wilcox was still DC so I don't know what you're happy about.

doogsinparadise

Has UW had more than two AAs since the '91 team?

sarktastic

Bullshit. These 3 are their own guys. They attribute their success to Chris Peterson. The only thing Sark did to help them was leave

Vegasdawg

Yep, under Sark's program, non of them would have done well at all. All three matured and blossomed under the new coaches.

GreenRiverGatorz

This is doog talk. We could argue all day about whether it was Sark's recruiting, Wilcox or Kwiatkowski's development, Petersen's inspiration, etc. Who gives a fuck. We're 8-5 with a 4-5 conference record. Individual accolades don't mean shit if there's no winning attached.

LoneStarDawg

Agreed, if we were 10-3 I'd be all in on this 3AA circle jerk, but at 8-5 it's almost embarrassing.

As always, win alot of fucking games then pop off.

EwaDawg

sarktastic said:

Peterman gets 3 right out of the shoot.

Who had more top end talent this year - USC or UW? Definitely USC. So why is Peterman taking Sark's leftovers and placing three on the first team AA list?

Tell me again how Peterman is not an upgrade over Sark.

bananasnblondes

Doogles said:

Sark's guys, Kikaha would have won the heisman if Wilcox was still DC so I don't know what you're happy about.

And we would still have Marcus Farria

BayDawg

bananasnblondes said:

Doogles said:

Sark's guys, Kikaha would have won the heisman if Wilcox was still DC so I don't know what you're happy about.

And we would still have Marcus Farria

Ahh yes, those 4 tackles and half a sack he got at Murray St would have really put us over the top.

#Farriathedooglegend

sarktastic

Fucking doogs.

It was SARK who fucked these three. Had SARK been able to evaluate, recruit and develop a complete team, these 3 would have enjoyed the team success their individual performances warranted.

sarktastic

EwaDawg said:

sarktastic said:

Peterman gets 3 right out of the shoot.

Who had more top end talent this year - USC or UW? Definitely USC. So why is Peterman taking Sark's leftovers and placing three on the first team AA list?

Tell me again how Peterman is not an upgrade over Sark.

Peterman can coach. All three attribute their success to Chris Peterson.

TommySQC

EwaDawg said:

sarktastic said:

Peterman gets 3 right out of the shoot.

Who had more top end talent this year - USC or UW? Definitely USC. So why is Peterman taking Sark's leftovers and placing three on the first team AA list?

Tell me again how Peterman is not an upgrade over Sark.

Because sanctions. And youth. Don't forget the youth.

puppylove_sugarsteel

Vegasdawg said:

Yep, under Sark's program, non of them would have done well at all. All three matured and blossomed under the new coaches.

Youre so full of shit Vegas. A fucking genie didnt magically appear and make them better players. You happen to notice kikahamora's sack total the year before? Shaq simply matured into the player he was destined to be, and got a chance at TB. Shelton matured as a senior who didnt get a redshirt year. Oh, dont forget Peters who was a likely AA, Sankey if he stayed. Thats 5 and we still would have stunk. Myrus is the problem here. What are those humping puppies at dawgman feeding you guys over there Vegas?

CuntWaffle

GreenRiverGatorz said:

This is doog talk. We could argue all day about whether it was Sark's recruiting, Wilcox or Kwiatkowski's development, Petersen's inspiration, etc. Who gives a fuck. We're 8-5 with a 4-5 conference record. Individual accolades don't mean shit if there's no winning attached.

Shelton and Shaq were shells of themselves last year. Kikaha has always been a monster but you have to credit this years staff in the development of Shelton and Shaq. Shaq probably just needed a little more confidence than anything, people were saying he was a disappointment when Sark was here.

CuntWaffle

TommySQC said:

EwaDawg said:

sarktastic said:

Peterman gets 3 right out of the shoot.

Who had more top end talent this year - USC or UW? Definitely USC. So why is Peterman taking Sark's leftovers and placing three on the first team AA list?

Tell me again how Peterman is not an upgrade over Sark.

Because sanctions. And youth. Don't forget the youth.

I really underestimated the toll that the sanctions would have on the team this year. In no way am I making an excuse for it, the results fall on the coaching staff and ultimately me. I can tell you we are very excited and optimistic about the future with the guys we have. With all we have been through with the sanctions this year we are going to be one tough ass football team next year!

LawDawg1

I'm sure these AA players are on Sark's website for putting them into the NFL already....

TierbsHsotBoobs

GreenRiverGatorz said:

This is doog talk. We could argue all day about whether it was Sark's recruiting, Wilcox or Kwiatkowski's development, Petersen's inspiration, etc. Who gives a fuck. We're 8-5 with a 4-5 conference record. Individual accolades don't mean shit if there's no winning attached.

Post. Of. The. Year.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Vegasdawg said:

Yep, under Sark's program, non of them would have done well at all. All three matured and blossomed under the new coaches.

Youre so full of shit Vegas. A fucking genie didnt magically appear and make them better players. You happen to notice kikahamora's sack total the year before? Shaq simply matured into the player he was destined to be, and got a chance at TB. Shelton matured as a senior who didnt get a redshirt year. Oh, dont forget Peters who was a likely AA, Sankey if he stayed. Thats 5 and we still would have stunk. Myrus is the problem here. What are those humping puppies at dawgman feeding you guys over there Vegas?

PL_SS, still a fucking idiot.

ThomasFremont

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

Vegasdawg said:

Yep, under Sark's program, non of them would have done well at all. All three matured and blossomed under the new coaches.

Youre so full of shit Vegas. A fucking genie didnt magically appear and make them better players. You happen to notice kikahamora's sack total the year before? Shaq simply matured into the player he was destined to be, and got a chance at TB. Shelton matured as a senior who didnt get a redshirt year. Oh, dont forget Peters who was a likely AA, Sankey if he stayed. Thats 5 and we still would have stunk. Myrus is the problem here. What are those humping puppies at dawgman feeding you guys over there Vegas?

PL_SS, still a fucking idiot.

I'm in complete agreement with Nacho.

AtomicDawg

EwaDawg said:

sarktastic said:

Peterman gets 3 right out of the shoot.

Who had more top end talent this year - USC or UW? Definitely USC. So why is Peterman taking Sark's leftovers and placing three on the first team AA list?

Tell me again how Peterman is not an upgrade over Sark.

Well… He probably is an upgrade. But it is all hypotheticals until the wins start coming in.

4-5>5-4