Instead of trying to interpret what I am or am not saying when I haven't said something, why don't you ask somebody instead? People trying to read shit into things that aren't there is one of the most fucktarded things that we do in society.
kind of like your tin foil hat theory about Wisconsin? or do you have admissible evidence?
winning ugly.
that, my friend, is a different conversation than "wins vs. trophies".
you're right. i do, occasionally, get confused. i'm confused right now about why you're confused over why your comment about ugly wins was initially confusing.
I didn't say you said he wasn't deserving. decent attempt at a red herring. I said your response was sour grapes. and it was.
and was he really seriously beating his chest about Oregon being superior to UW like in a "superior history" sense? I rather doubt it. even the dumbest ducks I know understand that they are at least a title and a decade or two away from that. I think he was being sarcastic.
I think you read into his comment what you wanted to read into it so you could bring up 1991. let's be honest.
or do you really think there are a lot of Oregon fans out there who think that it was the Heisman that's made them the now more historically significant program?
Of course, he only has to beat the #3 and #1 (probable) teams in CFB to get it.
Just think, if this were 1991, we'd be playing Ohio State in the Rose and we would probably cruise to a split title with Bama after they beat whoever in the Sugar.
The title is harder to win now for sure, but whoever gets it will have earned it, and there is a lot of great football on NYE and NYD this year, so I'm kind of coming around on this playoff thing.
If this was 91 Florida State beats some dreck in the Orange Bowel and is the undisputed unbeaten national champion.
Of course, he only has to beat the #3 and #1 (probable) teams in CFB to get it.
Just think, if this were 1991, we'd be playing Ohio State in the Rose and we would probably cruise to a split title with Bama after they beat whoever in the Sugar.
The title is harder to win now for sure, but whoever gets it will have earned it, and there is a lot of great football on NYE and NYD this year, so I'm kind of coming around on this playoff thing.
Disagree. The Bama/FSU Sugar Bowl winner would be the national champ in both poles.
Comments
kind of like your tin foil hat theory about Wisconsin? or do you have admissible evidence?
winning ugly.
that, my friend, is a different conversation than "wins vs. trophies".
you're right. i do, occasionally, get confused. i'm confused right now about why you're confused over why your comment about ugly wins was initially confusing.
I didn't say you said he wasn't deserving. decent attempt at a red herring. I said your response was sour grapes. and it was.
and was he really seriously beating his chest about Oregon being superior to UW like in a "superior history" sense? I rather doubt it. even the dumbest ducks I know understand that they are at least a title and a decade or two away from that. I think he was being sarcastic.
I think you read into his comment what you wanted to read into it so you could bring up 1991. let's be honest.
or do you really think there are a lot of Oregon fans out there who think that it was the Heisman that's made them the now more historically significant program?
and you got on my ass for mind reading.
75K? Judges?
hth
I see the irony of my handle is not lost upon you.
You are on your game lately my freng.