Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Bellevue vs Marysville Pilchuk report
Attended the game tonight to check out some of the potential recruits. Bellevue won 20-10. Hard fought game as it was 10-10 late in the 3rd quarter.
Austin Joyner- Wow. I have watched a lot of his film but one thing I was really impressed with tonight was his power. Very strong lower body. Bellevue was swarming on D but he has a great burst, has Roger Craig type high knee action as well. On one sweep he absolutely planted Gilchrist and barely broke stride. On D he played deep safety, very physical and has great closing speed and a very sure tackler. Really hope he flips to UW. Oh and of course exquisite hips
Henry Roberts- Tough to get a sense on lineman while live in person. Great feet and gets to the next level well. Even at 6'6" I see him more of a guard. Adams and Devin Burleson as tackles for this class
One player I have watched twice now and haven't been impressed is the jr USC commit Garcia. Just hasn't made many plays and tonight didn't even play that much D and just a little offense. No impact on either.
4 ·
Comments
If Peterman wants him, he's got to offer what Sark wouldn't... DEFENSE!
That's what I'm heering.
unfortunately, the Miami faithful are starting to use it too. it's like the ebola.
I work with someone with three kids who are D 1 athuleets, one of whom is at UW and was recrooted by Furd.
Furd has a tiered system by sport and the NCAA minimums mean nothing there. Nobody else in the conference takes that approach. Other than the historical technicality of the PE credit thing, which is entirely an accident of history and not any kind of statement on standards, everyone is operating on the same criteria.
If you're good enough, you're getting in unless you are below the mins, which you almost have to try and be.
I personally know of a UW women's bb recruit who really has no biz going to college - like, none - but 6 foh and 2 fity girls don't grow on trees y'all.
Talk to a even a mildly intelligent parent of a recruit who had to learn how the system works, and you will understand.
Furd, Duke, Vandy, the academies, maybe Rice (not sure) - they play it with a tiered system, and of course football has the easiest standards because you need more bodies. But even fb standards at furd are a lot higher than NCAA minimums. Like you have to have a core 3.3 or 3.5 (forget which) or better.
* Neuheisel: “‘Why can DeSean Jackson get into Cal, and not UCLA?’ ‘Why can Marshawn Lynch get into Cal, and not UCLA?’ Those are great questions [from Bruin fans]. But, I trust that we’re working towards having equality with Cal …”
Take it up with skippy. Just passing along his quotes. Doubt he would go on record if there wasn't something to it.
That tells me that there is a lot strategy in terms if how you play with these kids who can barely function academically and who aren't telling you they're with you. Face saving and a million other things go into it.
Bottom line is that Cal is harder and I have no doubt in key mind that ucla does not use harder criteria that. Cal for fb recruits.
If we were talking about uva I might bite. But not the bruins.
Cal may be harder to get into but they may let any dipshit in that meets the minimum requirement while other colleges are more stingy with their athletes.
See Charles Garcia as another example.
I'm convinced any team can get one exception through the door.
mercurynews.com/sports/ci_26823904/80-percent-cal-recruits-must-have-3-0