Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

How can we compete

2

Comments

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,453 Founders Club
    IrishDawg22 said:

    haie said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    haie said:

    I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.

    Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.

    Do I need to elaborate on Arizona and UCLA? Even fucking Stanford has more offensive talent if we keep Shaq and Ross solely on defense.

    This year we didn't have the offensive talent to compete, which the record shows.
    Is that why we had more total yards @ Arizona?

    Or why we had more total yards than ASU when we decided to pound the rock and the Oline started taking over the game?

    And why are you just focused on the offense? I said talent to compete, which means the entire team.

    Because I agree we had the talent on defense, with the fact in mind that the coaching staff pulled a secondary out of their asses.

    Get the fuck out of here with total yards in the fucking pac. Put 7's on the board or GTFO. We had nothing to lean on in that regard.

    It's as if you didn't see that the opponent just stacked the box and dared UW to beat them with terrible receivers and quarterbacks. Hell, our runningbacks aren't even complete backs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    haie said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    haie said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    haie said:

    I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.

    Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.

    Do I need to elaborate on Arizona and UCLA? Even fucking Stanford has more offensive talent if we keep Shaq and Ross solely on defense.

    This year we didn't have the offensive talent to compete, which the record shows.
    Is that why we had more total yards @ Arizona?

    Or why we had more total yards than ASU when we decided to pound the rock and the Oline started taking over the game?

    And why are you just focused on the offense? I said talent to compete, which means the entire team.

    Because I agree we had the talent on defense, with the fact in mind that the coaching staff pulled a secondary out of their asses.


    Peters was first round material and Shaq is POY material if Peterman doesn't ruin his season by switching him over to offense for 2 ypc.

    How many other teams have that kind of secondary talent? It's not the kids fault Peterman ran one off and squandered another.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,227
    If you cant see that Petermen gifted the Arizona game to Rich Rod to give the South the best chance to beat (Wh)Oregon, then I can't help you
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,453 Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    haie said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    haie said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    haie said:

    I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.

    Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.

    Do I need to elaborate on Arizona and UCLA? Even fucking Stanford has more offensive talent if we keep Shaq and Ross solely on defense.

    This year we didn't have the offensive talent to compete, which the record shows.
    Is that why we had more total yards @ Arizona?

    Or why we had more total yards than ASU when we decided to pound the rock and the Oline started taking over the game?

    And why are you just focused on the offense? I said talent to compete, which means the entire team.

    Because I agree we had the talent on defense, with the fact in mind that the coaching staff pulled a secondary out of their asses.


    Peters was first round material and Shaq is POY material if Peterman doesn't ruin his season by switching him over to offense for 2 ypc.

    How many other teams have that kind of secondary talent? It's not the kids fault Peterman ran one off and squandered another.
    Peters isn't on the team anymore, and isn't a team player.

    And Shaq is a fucking linebacker. Jesus Christ
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    haie said:

    Mosster47 said:

    haie said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    haie said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    haie said:

    I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.

    Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.

    Do I need to elaborate on Arizona and UCLA? Even fucking Stanford has more offensive talent if we keep Shaq and Ross solely on defense.

    This year we didn't have the offensive talent to compete, which the record shows.
    Is that why we had more total yards @ Arizona?

    Or why we had more total yards than ASU when we decided to pound the rock and the Oline started taking over the game?

    And why are you just focused on the offense? I said talent to compete, which means the entire team.

    Because I agree we had the talent on defense, with the fact in mind that the coaching staff pulled a secondary out of their asses.


    Peters was first round material and Shaq is POY material if Peterman doesn't ruin his season by switching him over to offense for 2 ypc.

    How many other teams have that kind of secondary talent? It's not the kids fault Peterman ran one off and squandered another.

    And Shaq is a fucking linebacker. Jesus Christ

    Yeah, but still
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dick_B
    Dick_B Member Posts: 1,301
    IrishDawg22 said:

    haie said:

    I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.

    Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.

    upvoted just because I *snickered*
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,553 Founders Club
    IrishDawg22 said:

    haie said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    haie said:

    I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.

    Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.

    Do I need to elaborate on Arizona and UCLA? Even fucking Stanford has more offensive talent if we keep Shaq and Ross solely on defense.

    This year we didn't have the offensive talent to compete, which the record shows.
    Is that why we had more total yards @ Arizona?

    Or why we had more total yards than ASU when we decided to pound the rock and the Oline started taking over the game?

    And why are you just focused on the offense? I said talent to compete, which means the entire team.

    Sounds like we competed then.

    Make up your mind
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,680
    Mosster47 said:

    haie said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    haie said:

    IrishDawg22 said:

    haie said:

    I like to say that UW has as much offensive talent as a team like ASU when my quarterback would be 3rd string on ASU.

    Congrats on graduating from the Race School of Fucking Misquotes.

    Do I need to elaborate on Arizona and UCLA? Even fucking Stanford has more offensive talent if we keep Shaq and Ross solely on defense.

    This year we didn't have the offensive talent to compete, which the record shows.
    Is that why we had more total yards @ Arizona?

    Or why we had more total yards than ASU when we decided to pound the rock and the Oline started taking over the game?

    And why are you just focused on the offense? I said talent to compete, which means the entire team.

    Because I agree we had the talent on defense, with the fact in mind that the coaching staff pulled a secondary out of their asses.


    Peters was first round material and Shaq is POY material if Peterman doesn't ruin his season by switching him over to offense for 2 ypc.

    How many other teams have that kind of secondary talent? It's not the kids fault Peterman ran one off and squandered another.
    You're really FS
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,553 Founders Club
    TTJ said:

    I'm hearing Arizona is super awesome.

    You really think a 10-2 team is terrible? No one said they are awesome. Some idiot said they are terrible.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    RaceBannon said:

    TTJ said:

    I'm hearing Arizona is super awesome.

    You really think a 10-2 team is terrible? No one said they are awesome. Some idiot said they are terrible.

    He seems to have some sand going on.

    image

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter