So I tune into the softy show the other day

dhdawg

He poses the question about year 5? Sark? Yadd a yadda. Brings up all the doog talking points of course. So then he gets to the callers. The first 2 said we're gonna play in the Ross Bowl this year, then the next one talks about how they don't get the top guys and how mediocrity should be the expectation. Then the final callers said rebuilding a program takes 7 years minimum and people need to be patient.
I knew our fanbase was awful but not this wow

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

dhdawg said:

He poses the question about year 5? Sark? Yadd a yadda. Brings up all the doog talking points of course. So then he gets to the callers. The first 2 said we're gonna play in the Ross Bowl this year, then the next one talks about how they don't get the top guys and how mediocrity should be the expectation. Then the final callers said rebuilding a program takes 7 years minimum and people need to be patient.
I knew our fanbase was awful but not this wow

Playing in the Ross Bowl is special.

DerekJohnson

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

dhdawg said:

He poses the question about year 5? Sark? Yadd a yadda. Brings up all the doog talking points of course. So then he gets to the callers. The first 2 said we're gonna play in the Ross Bowl this year, then the next one talks about how they don't get the top guys and how mediocrity should be the expectation. Then the final callers said rebuilding a program takes 7 years minimum and people need to be patient.
I knew our fanbase was awful but not this wow

Playing in the Ross Bowl is special.

Officially, is it the Ross Bowl, or the Ross Dress for Less Bowl?

tracker

dhdawg said:

He poses the question about year 5? Sark? Yadd a yadda. Brings up all the doog talking points of course. So then he gets to the callers. The first 2 said we're gonna play in the Ross Bowl this year, then the next one talks about how they don't get the top guys and how mediocrity should be the expectation. Then the final callers said rebuilding a program takes 7 years minimum and people need to be patient.
I knew our fanbase was awful but not this wow

Serves ya right for listening to Softy.

TierbsHsotBoobs

You deserve 0-12 for listening to Softy just as much as he and all those other callers deserve 0-12.

[Deleted User]

I know our fans are fucktarded but I always suspected that KJR plants these callers.

They do a good job of screening them because on topics like that you rarely if ever get a caller who comes on and says "I think another 7-6 is unacceptable and Sark should have been canned after the Apple Cup".

Fire_Marshall_Bill

He_Needs_More_Time said:

I know our fans are fucktarded but I always suspected that KJR plants these callers.

They do a good job of screening them because on topics like that you rarely if ever get a caller who comes on and says "I think another 7-6 is unacceptable and Sark should have been canned after the Apple Cup".

Of course. They're the flagship station. Jerk-offs like Baird long ago sold out.

Passion

dhdawg said:

He poses the question about year 5? Sark? Yadd a yadda. Brings up all the doog talking points of course. So then he gets to the callers. The first 2 said we're gonna play in the Ross Bowl this year, then the next one talks about how they don't get the top guys and how mediocrity should be the expectation. Then the final callers said rebuilding a program takes 7 years minimum and people need to be patient.
I knew our fanbase was awful but not this wow

Well, considering we have ONE decent interior DL (Shelton), we've whiffed on OL recruiting the past few years, and it usually takes a couple years before high school OLs are physically prepared for D-I football, that would put us in year 8 for Sark in terms of fielding decent offensive and defensive lines (assuming he starts recruiting AND developing players at those positions).

I argued with a friend back in Seattle yesterday who said, "One of the reasons I am optimistic about Sark is because he is a good recruiter."

My response: "Which positions does he recruit well?"

His answer: "All of them."

My victory statement: "Read this: hardcorehusky.com/news/an-analysis-of-washingtons-offensive-line "

DerekJohnson

Passion said:

dhdawg said:

He poses the question about year 5? Sark? Yadd a yadda. Brings up all the doog talking points of course. So then he gets to the callers. The first 2 said we're gonna play in the Ross Bowl this year, then the next one talks about how they don't get the top guys and how mediocrity should be the expectation. Then the final callers said rebuilding a program takes 7 years minimum and people need to be patient.
I knew our fanbase was awful but not this wow

Well, considering we have ONE decent interior DL (Shelton), we've whiffed on OL recruiting the past few years, and it usually takes a couple years before high school OLs are physically prepared for D-I football, that would put us in year 8 for Sark in terms of fielding decent offensive and defensive lines (assuming he starts recruiting AND developing players at those positions).

I argued with a friend back in Seattle yesterday who said, "One of the reasons I am optimistic about Sark is because he is a good recruiter."

My response: "Which positions does he recruit well?"

His answer: "All of them."

My victory statement: "Read this: hardcorehusky.com/news/an-analysis-of-washingtons-offensive-line "

FREE PUB!!

dhdawg

<

Passion said:

dhdawg said:

He poses the question about year 5? Sark? Yadd a yadda. Brings up all the doog talking points of course. So then he gets to the callers. The first 2 said we're gonna play in the Ross Bowl this year, then the next one talks about how they don't get the top guys and how mediocrity should be the expectation. Then the final callers said rebuilding a program takes 7 years minimum and people need to be patient.
I knew our fanbase was awful but not this wow

Well, considering we have ONE decent interior DL (Shelton), we've whiffed on OL recruiting the past few years, and it usually takes a couple years before high school OLs are physically prepared for D-I football, that would put us in year 8 for Sark in terms of fielding decent offensive and defensive lines (assuming he starts recruiting AND developing players at those positions).

I argued with a friend back in Seattle yesterday who said, "One of the reasons I am optimistic about Sark is because he is a good recruiter."

My response: "Which positions does he recruit well?"

His answer: "All of them."

My victory statement: "Read this: hardcorehusky.com/news/an-analysis-of-washingtons-offensive-line "

Now hold on, it could take longer, you have to take into account us being young in other positions in year 8. I'd say we have a window of years 8-10.