So we have the Doogs who run around singing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQmBXEZEYtgBut then we have a group of so called Husky fans I have named "Noogs". Now I am not very good at coming up with a creative profile, so I need some help creating a clear definition.
Here are some common traits:
--the polar opposite of a Doog. Everything is negative, well beyond being critical. DJ would have been burned at the stake by this group if Al Gore would have invented the internet a bit sooner.
--they throw out random stats/statements like "Wilcox's defense was the WORST in the SEC"
--going 0-12 would be better than Sark actually improving as a coach and getting to 9 wins
--claims Tim DeRuyter should be handed the keys after 1 season @ Fres St, but completely ignores the ass whoopin' he received from SMU in the bowl game
--unable to form an original thought. It is COOL to use the word Doog.
--when losing an argument and unable to produce facts or stats, quickly labels the other person a Doog
--unable to participate in a thread without trying to turn it into an obsession over Sark's man boobs
Personally I think most TRUE Dawg fans live somewhere in the middle of the Doogs & the Noogs. We expect to win, and if the HC cannot deliver that, then find someone who can.
If someone could come up with a better definition, it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
IrishDawg22
Comments
I have been called both, but I am probably 70 percent nega and 30% Doog... I really hate Oregon and root for them to lose...
Following along like just like a zombie because it is cool.
Still need that tissue???
Weak
Pressing