Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Don Lemon's 5 point plan

MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
This asshole shows no causation. He is likely a racist..and gay..

Lemon then listed five essential reforms black men need to make:

pull up pants
drop the N-word
take care of their communities
finish high school
lower rate of children born out of wedlock.

“More than 72% of children in the African American community are born out of wedlock,” Lemon continued, emphasizing this point as the top priority. “That means absent fathers. And the studies show that lack of a male role model is an express train right to prison, and the cycle continues.
«134

Comments

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,841 Founders Club
    The lack of causation is too big to overlook
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited July 2013
    "studies show that lack of a male role model is an express train right to prison, and the cycle continues."


    Really? What studies? I doubt these studies...if they exist, are valid in their conclusions.

    Readers of these studies need to consider two types of validity, internal and external. Internal validity means that the study measured what it set out to; external validity is the ability to generalize from the study to the reader. With respect to internal validity, selection bias, information bias, and confounding are present to some degree in all observational research. Selection bias stems from an absence of comparability between groups being studied. Information bias results from incorrect determination of exposure, outcome, or both. The effect of information bias depends on its type. If information is gathered differently for one group than for another, bias results. By contrast, non-differential misclassification tends to obscure real differences. Confounding is a mixing or blurring of effects: a researcher attempts to relate an exposure to an outcome but actually measures the effect of a third factor (the confounding variable). Confounding can be controlled in several ways: restriction, matching, stratification, and more sophisticated multivariate techniques. If a reader cannot explain away study results on the basis of selection, information, or confounding bias, then chance might be another explanation. Chance should be examined last, however, since these biases can account for highly significant, though bogus results. Differentiation between spurious, indirect, and causal associations can be difficult. Criteria such as temporal sequence, strength and consistency of an association, and evidence of a dose-response effect lend support to a causal link.
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    Meadowlark Lemon >>>>>>>>>> Don Lemon
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    TheGlove said:

    Meadowlark Lemon >>>>>>>>>> Don Lemon

    homophobe.
  • SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,297 Founders Club

    "studies show that lack of a male role model is an express train right to prison, and the cycle continues."


    Really? What studies? I doubt these studies...if they exist, are valid in their conclusions.

    Readers of these studies need to consider two types of validity, internal and external. Internal validity means that the study measured what it set out to; external validity is the ability to generalize from the study to the reader. With respect to internal validity, selection bias, information bias, and confounding are present to some degree in all observational research. Selection bias stems from an absence of comparability between groups being studied. Information bias results from incorrect determination of exposure, outcome, or both. The effect of information bias depends on its type. If information is gathered differently for one group than for another, bias results. By contrast, non-differential misclassification tends to obscure real differences. Confounding is a mixing or blurring of effects: a researcher attempts to relate an exposure to an outcome but actually measures the effect of a third factor (the confounding variable). Confounding can be controlled in several ways: restriction, matching, stratification, and more sophisticated multivariate techniques. If a reader cannot explain away study results on the basis of selection, information, or confounding bias, then chance might be another explanation. Chance should be examined last, however, since these biases can account for highly significant, though bogus results. Differentiation between spurious, indirect, and causal associations can be difficult. Criteria such as temporal sequence, strength and consistency of an association, and evidence of a dose-response effect lend support to a causal link.

    Yea, there's that, but still.

  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346

    This asshole shows no causation. He is likely a racist..and gay..($75,000.00)

  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    "studies show that lack of a male role model is an express train right to prison, and the cycle continues."


    Really? What studies? I doubt these studies...if they exist, are valid in their conclusions.

    Readers of these studies need to consider two types of validity, internal and external. Internal validity means that the study measured what it set out to; external validity is the ability to generalize from the study to the reader. With respect to internal validity, selection bias, information bias, and confounding are present to some degree in all observational research. Selection bias stems from an absence of comparability between groups being studied. Information bias results from incorrect determination of exposure, outcome, or both. The effect of information bias depends on its type. If information is gathered differently for one group than for another, bias results. By contrast, non-differential misclassification tends to obscure real differences. Confounding is a mixing or blurring of effects: a researcher attempts to relate an exposure to an outcome but actually measures the effect of a third factor (the confounding variable). Confounding can be controlled in several ways: restriction, matching, stratification, and more sophisticated multivariate techniques. If a reader cannot explain away study results on the basis of selection, information, or confounding bias, then chance might be another explanation. Chance should be examined last, however, since these biases can account for highly significant, though bogus results. Differentiation between spurious, indirect, and causal associations can be difficult. Criteria such as temporal sequence, strength and consistency of an association, and evidence of a dose-response effect lend support to a causal link.

    I don't need to do all that. You can just link us to all the published peer reviewed studies that show a correlation between single mothers and crime. But you wouldn't even know where to look for those would you? Besides "scientists" and their "scientific method" clearly have an agenda. But all these studies that you and Ann Coulter can't stop popping off about are legit. I mean a religious organization did them and "scientists" with their agenda have rejected them at every turn so they must be true.

    You don't know what the numbers are. I don't care about anything else. Youve made up your mind and you don't care what the facts are. You can say studies show but you've never seen the studies. You're ignorant, an idiot and kind of an asshole for the way your arguing something you really don't know.

    Good day sir.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    This asshole shows no causation. He is likely a racist..and gay..

    Lemon then listed five essential reforms black men need to make:

    pull up pants
    drop the N-word
    take care of their communities
    finish high school
    lower rate of children born out of wedlock.

    “More than 72% of children in the African American community are born out of wedlock,” Lemon continued, emphasizing this point as the top priority. “That means absent fathers. And the studies show that lack of a male role model is an express train right to prison, and the cycle continues.

    Less litter! Gooooooooo Planet!
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,506 Founders Club

    "Mike Damone is the funniest person I have ever encountered."

    -TheKobeStopper, June 2013


    "You're ignorant, an idiot and kind of an asshole for the way your arguing something you really don't know."

    -The KobeStopper speaking to Mike Damone, July 2013
  • BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346


    "Mike Damone is the funniest person I have ever encountered."

    -TheKobeStopper, June 2013


    "You're ignorant, an idiot and kind of an asshole for the way your arguing something you really don't know."

    -The KobeStopper speaking to Mike Damone, July 2013

    look at DJ and his screenshots.
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,506 Founders Club


    "Mike Damone is the funniest person I have ever encountered."

    -TheKobeStopper, June 2013


    "You're ignorant, an idiot and kind of an asshole for the way your arguing something you really don't know."

    -The KobeStopper speaking to Mike Damone, July 2013


    I agree with the general tone of both of those quotes.
    living a life of AND
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited July 2013

    "studies show that lack of a male role model is an express train right to prison, and the cycle continues."


    Really? What studies? I doubt these studies...if they exist, are valid in their conclusions.

    Readers of these studies need to consider two types of validity, internal and external. Internal validity means that the study measured what it set out to; external validity is the ability to generalize from the study to the reader. With respect to internal validity, selection bias, information bias, and confounding are present to some degree in all observational research. Selection bias stems from an absence of comparability between groups being studied. Information bias results from incorrect determination of exposure, outcome, or both. The effect of information bias depends on its type. If information is gathered differently for one group than for another, bias results. By contrast, non-differential misclassification tends to obscure real differences. Confounding is a mixing or blurring of effects: a researcher attempts to relate an exposure to an outcome but actually measures the effect of a third factor (the confounding variable). Confounding can be controlled in several ways: restriction, matching, stratification, and more sophisticated multivariate techniques. If a reader cannot explain away study results on the basis of selection, information, or confounding bias, then chance might be another explanation. Chance should be examined last, however, since these biases can account for highly significant, though bogus results. Differentiation between spurious, indirect, and causal associations can be difficult. Criteria such as temporal sequence, strength and consistency of an association, and evidence of a dose-response effect lend support to a causal link.

    I don't need to do all that. You can just link us to all the published peer reviewed studies that show a correlation between single mothers and crime. But you wouldn't even know where to look for those would you? Besides "scientists" and their "scientific method" clearly have an agenda. But all these studies that you and Ann Coulter can't stop popping off about are legit. I mean a religious organization did them and "scientists" with their agenda have rejected them at every turn so they must be true.

    You don't know what the numbers are. I don't care about anything else. Youve made up your mind and you don't care what the facts are. You can say studies show but you've never seen the studies. You're ignorant, an idiot and kind of an asshole for the way your arguing something you really don't know.

    Good day sir.
    You angry, bro?

    Ann Coulter, the fuck? I said nothing about that cunt. Take it up with Don Lemon. I was just passing along what I was hearing from him.

    Here's the answer! We need more of this, and more calling people racists and getting angry at them when they bring up the truth.


    image

    I SAID GOOD DAY!
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    This asshole shows no causation. He is likely a racist..and gay..

    Lemon then listed five essential reforms black men need to make:

    pull up pants
    drop the N-word
    take care of their communities
    finish high school
    lower rate of children born out of wedlock.

    “More than 72% of children in the African American community are born out of wedlock,” Lemon continued, emphasizing this point as the top priority. “That means absent fathers. And the studies show that lack of a male role model is an express train right to prison, and the cycle continues.

    Less litter! Gooooooooo Planet!
    This comment shows how little you understand the problem and the potential solutions.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    "studies show that lack of a male role model is an express train right to prison, and the cycle continues."


    Really? What studies? I doubt these studies...if they exist, are valid in their conclusions.

    Readers of these studies need to consider two types of validity, internal and external. Internal validity means that the study measured what it set out to; external validity is the ability to generalize from the study to the reader. With respect to internal validity, selection bias, information bias, and confounding are present to some degree in all observational research. Selection bias stems from an absence of comparability between groups being studied. Information bias results from incorrect determination of exposure, outcome, or both. The effect of information bias depends on its type. If information is gathered differently for one group than for another, bias results. By contrast, non-differential misclassification tends to obscure real differences. Confounding is a mixing or blurring of effects: a researcher attempts to relate an exposure to an outcome but actually measures the effect of a third factor (the confounding variable). Confounding can be controlled in several ways: restriction, matching, stratification, and more sophisticated multivariate techniques. If a reader cannot explain away study results on the basis of selection, information, or confounding bias, then chance might be another explanation. Chance should be examined last, however, since these biases can account for highly significant, though bogus results. Differentiation between spurious, indirect, and causal associations can be difficult. Criteria such as temporal sequence, strength and consistency of an association, and evidence of a dose-response effect lend support to a causal link.

    I don't need to do all that. You can just link us to all the published peer reviewed studies that show a correlation between single mothers and crime. But you wouldn't even know where to look for those would you? Besides "scientists" and their "scientific method" clearly have an agenda. But all these studies that you and Ann Coulter can't stop popping off about are legit. I mean a religious organization did them and "scientists" with their agenda have rejected them at every turn so they must be true.

    You don't know what the numbers are. I don't care about anything else. Youve made up your mind and you don't care what the facts are. You can say studies show but you've never seen the studies. You're ignorant, an idiot and kind of an asshole for the way your arguing something you really don't know.

    Good day sir.
    You angry, bro?

    Ann Coulter, the fuck? I said nothing about that cunt. Take it up with Don Lemon. I was just passing along what I was hearing from him.

    Here's the answer! We need more of this, and more calling people racists and getting angry at them when the bring up the truth.


    image

    I SAID GOOD DAY!
    I'm not angry Mike. I'm just disappointed.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    "studies show that lack of a male role model is an express train right to prison, and the cycle continues."


    Really? What studies? I doubt these studies...if they exist, are valid in their conclusions.

    Readers of these studies need to consider two types of validity, internal and external. Internal validity means that the study measured what it set out to; external validity is the ability to generalize from the study to the reader. With respect to internal validity, selection bias, information bias, and confounding are present to some degree in all observational research. Selection bias stems from an absence of comparability between groups being studied. Information bias results from incorrect determination of exposure, outcome, or both. The effect of information bias depends on its type. If information is gathered differently for one group than for another, bias results. By contrast, non-differential misclassification tends to obscure real differences. Confounding is a mixing or blurring of effects: a researcher attempts to relate an exposure to an outcome but actually measures the effect of a third factor (the confounding variable). Confounding can be controlled in several ways: restriction, matching, stratification, and more sophisticated multivariate techniques. If a reader cannot explain away study results on the basis of selection, information, or confounding bias, then chance might be another explanation. Chance should be examined last, however, since these biases can account for highly significant, though bogus results. Differentiation between spurious, indirect, and causal associations can be difficult. Criteria such as temporal sequence, strength and consistency of an association, and evidence of a dose-response effect lend support to a causal link.

    I don't need to do all that. You can just link us to all the published peer reviewed studies that show a correlation between single mothers and crime. But you wouldn't even know where to look for those would you? Besides "scientists" and their "scientific method" clearly have an agenda. But all these studies that you and Ann Coulter can't stop popping off about are legit. I mean a religious organization did them and "scientists" with their agenda have rejected them at every turn so they must be true.

    You don't know what the numbers are. I don't care about anything else. Youve made up your mind and you don't care what the facts are. You can say studies show but you've never seen the studies. You're ignorant, an idiot and kind of an asshole for the way your arguing something you really don't know.

    Good day sir.
    You angry, bro?

    Ann Coulter, the fuck? I said nothing about that cunt. Take it up with Don Lemon. I was just passing along what I was hearing from him.

    Here's the answer! We need more of this, and more calling people racists and getting angry at them when the bring up the truth.


    image

    I SAID GOOD DAY!
    I'm not angry Mike. I'm just disappointed.
    Well, call Don Lemon and let him know. The sell out that he is.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959


    "Mike Damone is the funniest person I have ever encountered."

    -TheKobeStopper, June 2013


    "You're ignorant, an idiot and kind of an asshole for the way your arguing something you really don't know."

    -The KobeStopper speaking to Mike Damone, July 2013

    Mods?
  • DerekJohnsonDerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 63,506 Founders Club


    "Mike Damone is the funniest person I have ever encountered."

    -TheKobeStopper, June 2013


    "You're ignorant, an idiot and kind of an asshole for the way your arguing something you really don't know."

    -The KobeStopper speaking to Mike Damone, July 2013

    Mods?
    I don't think anyone is moderating these boards
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680


    "Mike Damone is the funniest person I have ever encountered."

    -TheKobeStopper, June 2013


    "You're ignorant, an idiot and kind of an asshole for the way your arguing something you really don't know."

    -The KobeStopper speaking to Mike Damone, July 2013

    Mods?
    I don't think anyone is moderating these boards
    Don't test me.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,841 Founders Club
    If you can't make your point without a personal attack you'll probably fit in here
Sign In or Register to comment.