Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options
Don Lemon's 5 point plan
MikeDamone
Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
in Tug Tavern
This asshole shows no causation. He is likely a racist..and gay..
Lemon then listed five essential reforms black men need to make:
pull up pants
drop the N-word
take care of their communities
finish high school
lower rate of children born out of wedlock.
“More than 72% of children in the African American community are born out of wedlock,” Lemon continued, emphasizing this point as the top priority. “That means absent fathers. And the studies show that lack of a male role model is an express train right to prison, and the cycle continues.
Lemon then listed five essential reforms black men need to make:
pull up pants
drop the N-word
take care of their communities
finish high school
lower rate of children born out of wedlock.
“More than 72% of children in the African American community are born out of wedlock,” Lemon continued, emphasizing this point as the top priority. “That means absent fathers. And the studies show that lack of a male role model is an express train right to prison, and the cycle continues.
Comments
Really? What studies? I doubt these studies...if they exist, are valid in their conclusions.
Readers of these studies need to consider two types of validity, internal and external. Internal validity means that the study measured what it set out to; external validity is the ability to generalize from the study to the reader. With respect to internal validity, selection bias, information bias, and confounding are present to some degree in all observational research. Selection bias stems from an absence of comparability between groups being studied. Information bias results from incorrect determination of exposure, outcome, or both. The effect of information bias depends on its type. If information is gathered differently for one group than for another, bias results. By contrast, non-differential misclassification tends to obscure real differences. Confounding is a mixing or blurring of effects: a researcher attempts to relate an exposure to an outcome but actually measures the effect of a third factor (the confounding variable). Confounding can be controlled in several ways: restriction, matching, stratification, and more sophisticated multivariate techniques. If a reader cannot explain away study results on the basis of selection, information, or confounding bias, then chance might be another explanation. Chance should be examined last, however, since these biases can account for highly significant, though bogus results. Differentiation between spurious, indirect, and causal associations can be difficult. Criteria such as temporal sequence, strength and consistency of an association, and evidence of a dose-response effect lend support to a causal link.
You don't know what the numbers are. I don't care about anything else. Youve made up your mind and you don't care what the facts are. You can say studies show but you've never seen the studies. You're ignorant, an idiot and kind of an asshole for the way your arguing something you really don't know.
Good day sir.
"Mike Damone is the funniest person I have ever encountered."
-TheKobeStopper, June 2013
"You're ignorant, an idiot and kind of an asshole for the way your arguing something you really don't know."
-The KobeStopper speaking to Mike Damone, July 2013
I agree with the general tone of both of those quotes.
Ann Coulter, the fuck? I said nothing about that cunt. Take it up with Don Lemon. I was just passing along what I was hearing from him.
Here's the answer! We need more of this, and more calling people racists and getting angry at them when they bring up the truth.
I SAID GOOD DAY!