Pete can't recruit or relate to inner city edgy kids..
Comments
-
and the 14 other guys he flipped from other schools (like Wazzu, Oregon State, Utah, Arizona, Vanderbilt, etc) echo that "Hi"dhdawg said:
Buddha baker says hibeelzebub said:He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.
-
And McGary who wasn't committed but wasn't giving Sark the time of day.whatshouldicareabout said:
and the 14 other guys he flipped from other schools (like Wazzu, Oregon State, Utah, Arizona, Vanderbilt, etc) echo that "Hi"dhdawg said:
Buddha baker says hibeelzebub said:He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.
-
I doubt Miss State beat out Alabama, LSU, Auburn, and Georgia for very many guys. Michigan State isn't beating out Ohio State and Michigan. TCU and Baylor aren't beating Texas, A&M, and Oklahoma. If Petersen is the coach people think he is, he will win. If/when he wins, more four and five star guys will look into going to UW.beelzebub said:
Who is twisting? U dude. U cant honestly convince anyone or urself that at the end of recruiting cycle this class is good, dont give me rankings ur going to have more commits from competing against lower level Pac 12 schools and mountain west teams than who u should be competing with Oregon, Sc, Ucla Asu and probably stanford.chuck said:
Twisting.beelzebub said:He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.
He has said he won't put resources into recruiting kids who aren't genuinely interested in going to UW. He's not going to be fooled into thinking that a guy like Ruben Foster is genuinely interested just because he agreed to take a free trip.
You're fighting a losing battle on this one dumb dumb. Petersen has already shown he will recruit similarly or higher rated classes to UW than Sarkisian. Simpletons who don't know how to read the the aspects of recruiting rankings that sort of matter won't get this, but the 2014 class was about as good as any that Sark and his highly paid recruiting mercenaries brought in. That was in the transition year.
It's a stupid argument anyways. Peterman's current class is as highly rated as most of Sark's. It might even have a higher average star rating. -
Which, if you do care about the recruiting garbage that Scout and Rivals peddle, is the only rating that matters when evaluating a class.RoadDawg55 said:
I doubt Miss State beat out Alabama, LSU, Auburn, and Georgia for very many guys. Michigan State isn't beating out Ohio State and Michigan. TCU and Baylor aren't beating Texas, A&M, and Oklahoma. If Petersen is the coach people think he is, he will win. If/when he wins, more four and five star guys will look into going to UW.beelzebub said:
Who is twisting? U dude. U cant honestly convince anyone or urself that at the end of recruiting cycle this class is good, dont give me rankings ur going to have more commits from competing against lower level Pac 12 schools and mountain west teams than who u should be competing with Oregon, Sc, Ucla Asu and probably stanford.chuck said:
Twisting.beelzebub said:He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.
He has said he won't put resources into recruiting kids who aren't genuinely interested in going to UW. He's not going to be fooled into thinking that a guy like Ruben Foster is genuinely interested just because he agreed to take a free trip.
You're fighting a losing battle on this one dumb dumb. Petersen has already shown he will recruit similarly or higher rated classes to UW than Sarkisian. Simpletons who don't know how to read the the aspects of recruiting rankings that sort of matter won't get this, but the 2014 class was about as good as any that Sark and his highly paid recruiting mercenaries brought in. That was in the transition year.
It's a stupid argument anyways. Peterman's current class is as highly rated as most of Sark's. It might even have a higher average star rating.
-
Empatamann was a white 2 star farm boy from Idaho.
-
Wow 1 out of a class of 25 local kid no less.dhdawg said:
Buddha baker says hibeelzebub said:He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.
-
U get a psychology degree dude and deciding to use it on this board?chuck said:
Did you even pay attention to Sark's recruiting? Go take a look at offer lists. His classes were loaded with guys he stole from Mtn West schools and the basement dwellers of the Pac 10/12.beelzebub said:
Who is twisting? U dude. U cant honestly convince anyone or urself that at the end of recruiting cycle this class is good, dont give me rankings ur going to have more commits from competing against lower level Pac 12 schools and mountain west teams than who u should be competing with Oregon, Sc, Ucla Asu and probably stanford.chuck said:
Twisting.beelzebub said:He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.
He has said he won't put resources into recruiting kids who aren't genuinely interested in going to UW. He's not going to be fooled into thinking that a guy like Ruben Foster is genuinely interested just because he agreed to take a free trip.
You're fighting a losing battle on this one dumb dumb. Petersen has already shown he will recruit similarly or higher rated classes to UW than Sarkisian. Simpletons who don't know how to read the the aspects of recruiting rankings that sort of matter won't get this, but the 2014 class was about as good as any that Sark and his highly paid recruiting mercenaries brought in. That was in the transition year.
You suck. You're just touting doog myths with a lot of aggression and expecting it to have an impact because you're so tuff when you do it. -
It would be cool if you went off the road on the way to Pullman and died in a fiery car cash.beelzebub said:
U get a psychology degree dude and deciding to use it on this board?chuck said:
Did you even pay attention to Sark's recruiting? Go take a look at offer lists. His classes were loaded with guys he stole from Mtn West schools and the basement dwellers of the Pac 10/12.beelzebub said:
Who is twisting? U dude. U cant honestly convince anyone or urself that at the end of recruiting cycle this class is good, dont give me rankings ur going to have more commits from competing against lower level Pac 12 schools and mountain west teams than who u should be competing with Oregon, Sc, Ucla Asu and probably stanford.chuck said:
Twisting.beelzebub said:He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.
He has said he won't put resources into recruiting kids who aren't genuinely interested in going to UW. He's not going to be fooled into thinking that a guy like Ruben Foster is genuinely interested just because he agreed to take a free trip.
You're fighting a losing battle on this one dumb dumb. Petersen has already shown he will recruit similarly or higher rated classes to UW than Sarkisian. Simpletons who don't know how to read the the aspects of recruiting rankings that sort of matter won't get this, but the 2014 class was about as good as any that Sark and his highly paid recruiting mercenaries brought in. That was in the transition year.
You suck. You're just touting doog myths with a lot of aggression and expecting it to have an impact because you're so tuff when you do it. -
Awfully warm for Februarybeelzebub said:
Who is twisting? U dude. U cant honestly convince anyone or urself that at the end of recruiting cycle this class is good, dont give me rankings ur going to have more commits from competing against lower level Pac 12 schools and mountain west teams than who u should be competing with Oregon, Sc, Ucla Asu and probably stanford.chuck said:
Twisting.beelzebub said:He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.
He has said he won't put resources into recruiting kids who aren't genuinely interested in going to UW. He's not going to be fooled into thinking that a guy like Ruben Foster is genuinely interested just because he agreed to take a free trip.
You're fighting a losing battle on this one dumb dumb. Petersen has already shown he will recruit similarly or higher rated classes to UW than Sarkisian. Simpletons who don't know how to read the the aspects of recruiting rankings that sort of matter won't get this, but the 2014 class was about as good as any that Sark and his highly paid recruiting mercenaries brought in. That was in the transition year. -
One example, clearly not the only one.beelzebub said:
Wow 1 out of a class of 25 local kid no less.dhdawg said:
Buddha baker says hibeelzebub said:He's a lazy recruiter he wont fight for the higher ranked kid, he said he wasnt going to waist his time on recruiting kids who have other schools ranked above Huskies, he's going to see very shortly that he wont win in Pac 12 with that nonsense.
http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=8&c=1&nid=6568661
http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=8&c=1&nid=678458
http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=8&c=1&nid=6344251
http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=8&c=1&nid=6857412
http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=8&c=1&nid=6657071
There's more than that. You're ignorance is really evident in this thread
