Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Is There Anything More Worthless Than a Dawgman Impact Report?

RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
in Hardcore Husky Board
I know they put out a lot of worthless and idiotic analysis, but these might be the worst.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • SwayeSwaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,497 Founders Club
    Chicken shit on a pump handle?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 14,531 Swaye's Wigwam
    This thread?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecorneljecornel Member Posts: 9,727
    If you follow the logic of the legendary Dick Baird you won't know anything about the players you recruited for two or three years. Impact report sounds like a puff piece?

    I did notice that dm.cm still has the old site operating. I thought that technology was 10 years old and new one would be up by now. What's the problem?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    edited July 2013
    bananasnblondes said:

    Although it is fun to look back and see the "impact report" for guys like Scott Lawyer and Nathan Dean. Surprisingly, it doesn't say "since he chose UW over Cal Poly, he should serve well as a backup on the scout team" or "we anticipate this player quitting before stepping on the field for a snap".

    I also recently discovered that all the recruiting blogs featuring Scott's predictions on Jack, Vanderdoes, Falah, etc. Have been deleted

    That is why they are so worthless. Any highly rated recruit is a big time get who should force his way into playing time right away. Every 2 or 3 star prospect is raw and needs a couple years with Ivan, but will be a good player by their redshirt junior year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Better question is why are you a subscriber?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chrisvashonchrisvashon Member Posts: 627
    edited July 2013
    Has there ever been a negative "impact report"? My sense is no. Recruiting expert Fatters somehow misses all the busts.

    I confess I only read a couple before I realized I dngaf what this fat looser thinks... about anything.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • chrisvashonchrisvashon Member Posts: 627
    CuntWaffle said:

    Better question is why are you a subscriber?

    Until this place talks REAL football and teenage boy stalking, dawgman has a place. Roaddawg, passion, heretobeatmychest - actually doing a decent job at bringing substance. Hope they keep it up.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    CuntWaffle said:

    Better question is why are you a subscriber?

    I'm not.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IrishDawg22IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    RoadDawg55 said:

    I know they put out a lot of worthless and idiotic analysis, but these might be the worst.

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • section8section8 Member Posts: 1,581
    chrisvashon said:

    Has there ever been a negative "impact report"? My sense is no. Recruiting expert Fatters somehow misses all the busts.

    I confess I only read a couple before I realized I dngaf what this fat looser thinks... about anything.

    Nothing negative until the recruit signs someplace else when the wdwha machine kicks into overdrive.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,280
    section8 said:

    chrisvashon said:

    Has there ever been a negative "impact report"? My sense is no. Recruiting expert Fatters somehow misses all the busts.

    I confess I only read a couple before I realized I dngaf what this fat looser thinks... about anything.

    Nothing negative until the recruit signs someplace else when the wdwha machine kicks into overdrive.
    Yeah, the impact reports of Myles Jack, Max Browne, Braden Kearsley, and Mattingly were all pretty negative. They must really suck; some character issues there as well. That OL named Harlow initially had a positive impact report, but then it was reported that he was nothing special. Not sure what happened there. The opposite was true for Enewally. Originally he was not projected to have a positive impact, but then at the last minute, he ended up getting a very glowing review by the staff. Again, I'm not sure what happened but I'm sure there wasn't any kind of bias going on.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    chrisvashon said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    Better question is why are you a subscriber?

    Until this place talks REAL football and teenage boy stalking, dawgman has a place. Roaddawg, passion, heretobeatmychest - actually doing a decent job at bringing substance. Hope they keep it up.
    It's awfully warm out for late August.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,434
    RoadDawg55 said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    Although it is fun to look back and see the "impact report" for guys like Scott Lawyer and Nathan Dean. Surprisingly, it doesn't say "since he chose UW over Cal Poly, he should serve well as a backup on the scout team" or "we anticipate this player quitting before stepping on the field for a snap".

    I also recently discovered that all the recruiting blogs featuring Scott's predictions on Jack, Vanderdoes, Falah, etc. Have been deleted

    That is why they are so worthless. Any highly rated recruit is a big time get who should force his way into playing time right away. Every 2 or 3 star prospect is raw and needs a couple years with Ivan, but will be a good player by their redshirt junior year.
    You guys need to stop with the negativity!!!! Recruits read this board
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.